Berliner Boersenzeitung - IDTechEx Outlines the Future of Automotive Radar - Miniaturising Size and Maximising Performance

EUR -
AED 3.959931
AFN 74.942278
ALL 101.524416
AMD 433.755616
ANG 1.944394
AOA 896.629001
ARS 392.049845
AUD 1.643361
AWG 1.940983
AZN 1.847013
BAM 1.957387
BBD 2.178416
BDT 118.676197
BGN 1.954522
BHD 0.40656
BIF 3076.458568
BMD 1.078324
BND 1.447107
BOB 7.455078
BRL 5.286057
BSD 1.07888
BTN 89.895352
BWP 14.739084
BYN 3.554514
BYR 21135.151747
BZD 2.174683
CAD 1.464581
CDF 2884.51646
CHF 0.943059
CLF 0.034046
CLP 939.431134
CNY 7.705272
COP 4310.611248
CRC 569.364156
CUC 1.078324
CUP 28.575588
CVE 110.582103
CZK 24.296754
DJF 191.639446
DKK 7.456504
DOP 61.410806
DZD 145.220075
EGP 33.372079
ERN 16.174861
ETB 60.089616
FJD 2.412965
FKP 0.856695
GBP 0.857056
GEL 2.889741
GGP 0.856695
GHS 12.950947
GIP 0.856695
GMD 72.625303
GNF 9278.978972
GTQ 8.447926
GYD 225.719243
HKD 8.423916
HNL 26.688021
HRK 7.593094
HTG 142.717007
HUF 379.721059
IDR 16745.617961
ILS 3.98768
IMP 0.856695
INR 89.857769
IQD 1412.60453
IRR 45572.665952
ISK 150.200322
JEP 0.856695
JMD 167.52968
JOD 0.764965
JPY 158.742229
KES 165.360695
KGS 96.315951
KHR 4442.694975
KMF 492.25664
KPW 970.409136
KRW 1417.764296
KWD 0.332793
KYD 0.899137
KZT 497.354677
LAK 22353.658067
LBP 16212.602168
LKR 352.695888
LRD 202.88616
LSL 20.434904
LTL 3.18401
LVL 0.652267
LYD 5.197314
MAD 10.888374
MDL 19.11794
MGA 4924.706148
MKD 61.65998
MMK 2265.657509
MNT 3723.443077
MOP 8.677775
MRO 384.961507
MUR 47.557015
MVR 16.551774
MWK 1809.967557
MXN 18.632255
MYR 5.034719
MZN 68.203943
NAD 20.434279
NGN 866.430784
NIO 39.62895
NOK 11.81345
NPR 143.832923
NZD 1.75253
OMR 0.415151
PAB 1.078985
PEN 4.052876
PGK 4.019132
PHP 59.721907
PKR 306.462035
PLN 4.326624
PYG 7963.639803
QAR 3.92564
RON 4.967732
RSD 117.09072
RUB 100.065323
RWF 1348.444248
SAR 4.044571
SBD 9.131256
SCR 15.376738
SDG 648.073182
SEK 11.272643
SGD 1.445779
SHP 1.312051
SLE 24.472198
SLL 21296.899999
SOS 616.265707
SRD 40.850121
STD 22319.131095
SYP 14019.420871
SZL 20.433789
THB 37.983423
TJS 11.797572
TMT 3.774134
TND 3.374612
TOP 2.549428
TRY 31.182222
TTD 7.318967
TWD 33.954803
TZS 2695.809951
UAH 39.588357
UGX 4072.39542
USD 1.078324
UYU 42.214218
UZS 13301.127193
VEF 3825610.805758
VES 38.294932
VND 26192.49163
VUV 128.967846
WST 2.939216
XAF 656.50437
XAG 0.045032
XAU 0.000531
XCD 2.914224
XDR 0.811141
XOF 655.089492
XPF 119.693965
YER 269.931462
ZAR 20.413591
ZMK 9706.203717
ZMW 25.947153
ZWL 347.21991
  • RBGPF

    -1.7840

    67.3

    -2.65%

  • RYCEF

    0.0340

    3.634

    +0.94%

  • CMSC

    0.0800

    24.6

    +0.33%

  • BTI

    -2.6710

    28.869

    -9.25%

  • RELX

    0.0120

    38.822

    +0.03%

  • GSK

    -0.0900

    36.24

    -0.25%

  • NGG

    0.8050

    67.045

    +1.2%

  • SCU

    -0.0300

    12.72

    -0.24%

  • SCS

    0.0550

    12.425

    +0.44%

  • SLAC

    0.0000

    10.3

    0%

  • RIO

    0.6700

    69.16

    +0.97%

  • VOD

    0.0350

    9.065

    +0.39%

  • CMSD

    0.0300

    24.15

    +0.12%

  • JRI

    0.1700

    11.4

    +1.49%

  • BP

    -0.3800

    34.91

    -1.09%

  • BCE

    0.3750

    40.845

    +0.92%

  • BCC

    -1.2050

    112.215

    -1.07%

  • AZN

    -0.2150

    63.795

    -0.34%

IDTechEx Outlines the Future of Automotive Radar - Miniaturising Size and Maximising Performance
IDTechEx Outlines the Future of Automotive Radar - Miniaturising Size and Maximising Performance

IDTechEx Outlines the Future of Automotive Radar - Miniaturising Size and Maximising Performance

BOSTON, Nov. 17, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Radar has been one of the most significant additions to vehicles in the past two decades. It provides luxury advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) features like adaptive cruise control (ACC), as well as critical safety features like automatic emergency braking and blind spot detection. It has grown from an expensive accessory feature on the most upmarket cars to an almost ubiquitous presence across all price points.

Text size:

IDTechEx's research conducted in "Automotive Radar 2024-2044: Forecasts, Technologies, Applications" shows that, on average, 70% of new cars shipped in 2022 had a front-facing radar, while 30% had side radars. However, with ADAS systems becoming more sophisticated and level 3 autonomous systems entering the market for the first time, radar technology needs to improve to meet the new performance demands these systems require. As such, the industry is now seeing the first generations of "4D imaging" radars come to market and get deployed onto vehicles. With that in mind, here IDTechEx explores what a 4D imaging radar is, why it is needed, and what new technologies they are using.

What is a 4D imaging radar? 

Firstly, a 4D radar is not automatically an imaging radar. The two terminologies can sometimes seem interchangeable; however, IDTechEx believes it is important to distinguish between the two. In the past, most radar have been limited to 3 dimensions, with these being azimuth (horizontal angle), distance, and velocity. A 4D radar simply means the addition of some resolving ability in the elevation direction.

A classic example that highlights the need for this fourth dimension is the scenario of detecting a parked car in the entrance of a tunnel. A 3D radar will return the same results whether there is a car in the entrance or not. Normally, the vehicle will assume that the large reflection is a tunnel, and the adaptive cruise control system will continue. This behavior is perfectly acceptable if a human is behind the wheel and can override the ACC system accordingly, but it becomes an issue for vehicles operating at SAE level 3 and above, which has become a real-world reality over the past couple of years.

In theory a 4D radar will overcome this problem. The addition of the vertical resolution means the radar should be able to separate the stopped vehicle at ground level from the tunnel a few meters above the deck. However, if the vertical resolution is poor to the extent that the tunnel and car are still present in the same "pixel", then the situation has not been improved. This is where the distinction between 4D radar and 4D imaging radar comes into play. The imaging radar should have sufficient angular resolution that it can distinguish the tunnel and vehicle even at very long distances. In fact, IDTechEx thinks that an imaging radar should have sufficient resolution to distinguish much smaller obstacles at long distances, for instance, a person on the road at 100m. But what resolution is needed to do this? Assuming that the person is 5-6ft tall, a resolution of around 1˚  would be needed to separate the person from the road. In this scenario, the system would have enough time to activate the brakes and bring the vehicle to a stop, avoiding a collision, even at highway speeds.

However, being able to detect the person is one thing; correctly classifying them as a person with the radar data alone is another. This is why radar is usually supported with front-facing cameras for applications like automatic emergency braking. At night-time, in foggy conditions, or in heavy rain, the camera might not be able to see either. In these situations, there are a few options: add short or long-wave infrared detection to the vehicle, providing camera-like resolution with robustness to poor visibility conditions, add LiDAR to the vehicle, with radar-like ranging abilities but at a large cost, or improve the resolution of radar further.

Getting to 1˚  resolution and beyond

Radar has a natural physical limit to its resolving performance known as the Rayleigh Criterion, which is proportional to the inverse of frequency multiplied by aperture size (1/ƒ∂). In short, a normal automotive radar operating at 77GHz, and with an antenna array 10cm wide, should be able to reach a resolution 2.8˚ . For context, a typical human eye can resolve at around 0.005-0.01˚ , enough to see a 1cm object at 100m. To improve radar's resolution its operating frequency could be increased, after all humans use visible light which is in the hundreds of terahertz. However, the frequency of radar is limited by regulations and is not something that is easily changed.

The next option is to increase the size of the aperture. While this is technically possible, doing so runs into practicality challenges. In order to get from 2.8˚  to 1˚, the aperture needs to increase from 10cm to 28cm. To get this resolution in both azimuth and elevation, the radar is now 28cm x 28cm, which will be challenging to integrate into the front bumper. It will likely cause airflow issues to the radiator, could be difficult to protect from damage, and will cause the OEM's aesthetics teams a bit of a headache. IDTechEx has seen radars getting larger, with examples like Continental's ARS540, Bosch's FR5+, and Arbe's Phoenix all exceeding 10cm, but the largest of these, the Phoenix, is still only 12.7cm x 14.3cm.

Another issue with creating larger radar is filling them with channels. Creating a 28cm x 28cm radar without the supporting semiconductor technology would be like building a $10,000 DSLR camera lens and pairing it with a 1MP camera phone sensor from 2001. Here, the analog to pixels is virtual channels, which is the multiple of a radar's transmitting and receiving channels (Tx and Rx). In the past a 3D radar might have one transmitting channel and three receiving (1Tx/3Rx). A basic 4D radar would likely use a radar transceiver with a 3Tx/4Rx arrangement, while some leading radar combine four of these chips to get a 12Tx/16Rx arrangement with 192 virtual channels. Arbe has developed a chipset that scales to 48Tx/48Rx in a single radar giving 2,304 virtual channels. This helps Arbe in achieving 1˚  resolution in the azimuth and 1.7˚  in the elevation.

One way of combating the challenges around building a very large radar is to distribute it somehow. IDTechEx has seen a couple of approaches to this. One from Zendar involves using two lower-performance radar placed on opposite ends of the bumper and working together. Now, the aperture size has increased from less than 10cm to effectively 1.5-2m. As such, the resolution of these two radar working together is just over 0.1˚  in the azimuth. The other approach that IDTechEx has seen is to build separate antenna boards for each channel (on a 3Tx/4Rx radar) and place them across the bumper. This is the development route being explored by Plastic Omnium and Greener Wave.

Software is another key aspect of this discussion, and nearly all the companies mentioned here will be using some kind of super resolution software to improve their performance. Returning to the camera analogy, modern DSLR cameras come with powerful processors that can make the most of an image, while the cameras in modern phones have had years of software development to produce the sharpest, most natural-looking results. In radar, there are a few examples of start-ups making some exemplary algorithms for improving the resolution of radar without making any physical changes. Zadar Labs uses technologies like machine learning, AI, and encoded transmission signals to improve radar performance. Spartan, on the other hand, uses an algorithm based on research for F-18 and F-35 fighter jet applications. Super-resolution software can improve the angular resolution by a factor of 4, taking a standard 2.8˚  angular resolution radar down to 0.5-1˚  and lower if it is already employing some of the other techniques discussed here.

Scanning is another promising option for radar. Metawave's metamaterial antenna uses beamforming and beam steering technologies to focus the radar's performance into a thin fan. This fan is then scanned through the desired elevation field of view, providing upgraded resolution performance in both elevation and azimuth. The other bonus of this technology is that the emission energy is spread over a far smaller area than a flash-type approach, meaning it can achieve longer ranges than a non-scanning equivalent.

With all these options for building the next generation of radar, how can one know which is best? IDTechEx's "Automotive Radar 2024-2044: Forecasts, Technologies, Applications" report goes into even more detail about how these technologies work and improve radar performance. The report also presents benchmarking analysis to pit these technologies against each other over key performance indicators such as angular resolution, range, field of view, and frame rate, identifying which technology produces the best overall package, with some unexpected results.

IDTechEx radar technology benchmarking

IDTechEx's latest report, "Automotive Radar 2024-2044: Forecasts, Technologies, Applications" provides a holistic overview of the automotive radar industry, including tier one and tier 2 products, market shares, start-ups, new technologies, material requirements, autonomous and ADAS markets, and 20-year forecasts.

For the full report and downloadable sample pages, please see www.IDTechEx.com/Radar. For more information on the full portfolio of IDTechEx research and how to access the expert-led data and analysis as part of a market intelligence subscription, please visit www.IDTechEx.com.

About IDTechEx

IDTechEx guides your strategic business decisions through its Research, Subscription and Consultancy products, helping you profit from emerging technologies. For more information, contact [email protected] or visit www.IDTechEx.com.

Images download:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/p5dpn10vucj3f7ddwbo5h/h?rlkey=292keyzjm94p29vrsas2ao21g&dl=0 

Media Contact:

Lucy Rogers
Sales and Marketing Administrator
[email protected]
+44(0)1223 812300

Social Media Links:

Twitter: www.twitter.com/IDTechEx
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/IDTechEx


(U.Gruber--BBZ)