Berliner Boersenzeitung - Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

EUR -
AED 4.239148
AFN 76.183133
ALL 93.242695
AMD 422.066935
AOA 1059.642688
ARS 1727.110367
AUD 1.638971
AWG 2.080616
AZN 1.960251
BAM 1.955655
BBD 2.324318
BDT 142.849428
BHD 0.435164
BIF 3449.11485
BMD 1.154295
BND 1.479784
BOB 13.958027
BRL 5.910221
BSD 1.15401
BTN 109.825872
BWP 15.607777
BYN 3.416732
BYR 22624.173581
BZD 2.320918
CAD 1.615637
CDF 2609.859744
CHF 0.93435
CLF 0.02672
CLP 1055.048443
CNY 7.791054
CNH 7.789111
COP 3672.942237
CRC 524.929317
CUC 1.154295
CUP 30.588806
CVE 110.25684
CZK 24.205269
DJF 205.50301
DKK 7.475304
DOP 67.244732
DZD 153.502688
EGP 57.471515
ERN 17.314419
ETB 186.262401
FJD 2.553819
FKP 0.857432
GBP 0.857122
GEL 3.018477
GGP 0.857432
GHS 13.565055
GIP 0.857432
GMD 84.842311
GNF 10135.249888
GTQ 8.805348
GYD 241.43004
HKD 9.054939
HNL 30.930577
HRK 7.534661
HTG 150.888179
HUF 363.741084
IDR 20659.564222
ILS 3.476689
IMP 0.857432
INR 109.925261
IQD 1511.781564
IRR 1586924.175584
ISK 141.990031
JEP 0.857432
JMD 182.926462
JOD 0.818416
JPY 182.177709
KES 149.308045
KGS 100.942743
KHR 4682.633154
KMF 492.883829
KRW 1642.584342
KWD 0.356596
KYD 0.961725
KZT 540.782319
LAK 26074.844302
LBP 103342.499248
LKR 387.641311
LRD 208.303681
LSL 18.823107
LTL 3.408332
LVL 0.698221
LYD 7.356456
MAD 10.767203
MDL 20.079427
MGA 4961.611298
MKD 61.52518
MMK 2423.376627
MNT 4150.658845
MOP 9.324769
MRU 46.264576
MUR 54.182173
MVR 17.833786
MWK 2001.034568
MXN 19.905129
MYR 4.720486
MZN 73.770814
NAD 18.823025
NGN 1573.04937
NIO 42.466857
NOK 11.000254
NPR 175.719473
NZD 1.961533
OMR 0.443831
PAB 1.154005
PEN 3.900811
PGK 5.098623
PHP 70.147602
PKR 320.383288
PLN 4.298905
PYG 6864.462226
QAR 4.218488
RON 5.254356
RSD 117.323662
RUB 93.874598
RWF 1695.26719
SAR 4.334528
SBD 9.313251
SCR 16.730066
SDG 693.14483
SEK 10.923534
SGD 1.479794
SLE 28.393616
SOS 659.54833
SRD 43.479949
STD 23891.567097
STN 24.498081
SVC 10.097253
SZL 18.807445
THB 38.149235
TJS 10.64572
TMT 4.040031
TND 3.384764
TRY 54.934005
TTD 7.813388
TWD 37.188029
TZS 3058.878269
UAH 51.673876
UGX 4298.663235
USD 1.154295
UYU 46.47656
UZS 13752.982139
VES 870.581951
VND 30282.918056
VUV 137.758452
WST 3.15032
XAF 655.905615
XAG 0.018708
XAU 0.000271
XCD 3.119538
XCG 2.079855
XDR 0.814801
XOF 655.908456
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.423548
ZAR 18.82236
ZMK 10389.969123
ZMW 21.955185
ZWL 371.682381
  • NGG

    -0.1600

    80.26

    -0.2%

  • GSK

    -0.0700

    51.46

    -0.14%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    59.27

    +0.25%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    36.61

    -0.52%

  • BP

    -1.2300

    41.21

    -2.98%

  • RYCEF

    0.6000

    21

    +2.86%

  • BCC

    -1.6900

    84.8

    -1.99%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    22.04

    +0.09%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    22.06

    +0.27%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    15.31

    -2.48%

  • AZN

    5.8800

    161.5

    +3.64%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    21.73

    -0.28%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.74

    0%

  • RIO

    2.5000

    101.51

    +2.46%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.67

    -0.39%

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam / Photo: Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV - AFP

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.

Text size:

As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.

While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.

AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.

One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.

"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.

Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.

- 'Scams' -

AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.

"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.

"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."

JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."

It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."

Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."

AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.

The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.

JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.

"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.

- 'Liar's dividend' -

Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.

To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.

The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.

Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."

"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.

"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."

Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.

However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.

The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.

"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.

"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."

burs-ac/dw

(H.Schneide--BBZ)