Berliner Boersenzeitung - In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels

EUR -
AED 4.095102
AFN 72.480008
ALL 90.801688
AMD 402.807486
ANG 1.995737
AOA 1023.635334
ARS 1721.721299
AUD 1.61933
AWG 2.007127
AZN 1.900047
BAM 1.955836
BBD 2.250342
BDT 139.162586
BGN 1.948955
BHD 0.422108
BIF 3342.96213
BMD 1.115071
BND 1.431727
BOB 13.402249
BRL 6.138357
BSD 1.117321
BTN 104.873949
BWP 15.391286
BYN 3.345962
BYR 21855.38619
BZD 2.247142
CAD 1.573644
CDF 2586.964483
CHF 0.914162
CLF 0.027822
CLP 1094.980351
CNY 7.444774
CNH 7.438418
COP 3608.76707
CRC 506.709417
CUC 1.115071
CUP 26.815498
CVE 110.267049
CZK 24.346956
DJF 198.963698
DKK 7.480457
DOP 67.891262
DZD 151.940824
EGP 59.957114
ERN 16.726061
ETB 183.378708
FJD 2.526309
FKP 0.834974
GBP 0.834166
GEL 2.893653
GGP 0.834974
GHS 13.055243
GIP 0.834974
GMD 83.077063
GNF 9896.183924
GTQ 8.538159
GYD 234.234353
HKD 8.744429
HNL 30.029558
HRK 7.547925
HTG 146.432722
HUF 363.51345
IDR 20192.258205
ILS 3.552538
IMP 0.834974
INR 104.716854
IQD 1693.83148
IRR 2108992.359359
ISK 136.919964
JEP 0.834974
JMD 177.323296
JOD 0.790629
JPY 176.710877
KES 145.192698
KGS 97.510486
KHR 4552.084602
KMF 492.86165
KPW 1003.563608
KRW 1520.737678
KWD 0.346765
KYD 0.931217
KZT 500.809308
LAK 25136.46717
LBP 100053.859534
LKR 371.556906
LRD 189.94353
LSL 18.477643
LTL 3.292514
LVL 0.674496
LYD 7.150133
MAD 10.921803
MDL 19.971371
MGA 5077.094359
MKD 61.556144
MMK 2341.587311
MNT 4015.514918
MOP 9.019368
MRU 45.108838
MUR 52.442198
MVR 17.176258
MWK 1937.436008
MXN 20.766565
MYR 4.528864
MZN 71.257178
NAD 18.477643
NGN 1502.23485
NIO 41.120764
NOK 10.548462
NPR 167.798119
NZD 2.015128
OMR 0.428348
PAB 1.117421
PEN 3.848972
PGK 5.092095
PHP 70.369926
PKR 309.016043
PLN 4.399568
PYG 6984.129802
QAR 4.084276
RON 5.343646
RSD 117.622186
RUB 91.352798
RWF 1649.13065
SAR 4.188587
SBD 8.974739
SCR 15.358485
SDG 670.719139
SEK 11.033072
SGD 1.430306
SHP 0.835103
SLE 25.591287
SLL 23382.48045
SOS 638.511867
SRD 41.908265
STD 23079.712667
STN 24.500455
SVC 9.776182
SYP 14498.149201
SZL 18.471343
THB 37.411034
TJS 10.307092
TMT 3.902748
TND 3.343362
TOP 2.684822
TRY 55.9111
TTD 7.577141
TWD 36.546782
TZS 2952.454872
UAH 50.616941
UGX 4570.084937
USD 1.115071
UYU 44.950835
UZS 13332.247784
VES 999.456181
VND 28526.296796
VUV 132.393741
WST 3.108622
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021465
XAU 0.000274244363
XCD 3.013535
XCG 2.013637
XDR 0.788413
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.853652
ZAR 18.420333
ZMK 10036.978597
ZMW 22.703422
ZWL 359.052318
SSP 6406.340367
MXV 2.33632
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels
In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels / Photo: LOIC VENANCE - AFP/File

In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels

Europe is taking longer than planned to concoct an EU-wide food-labelling system after a colour-coded scheme created in France did not go down well in culinary rival Italy.

Text size:

Fearing that cultural icons such as olive oil or Parmesan cheese would get bad grades, Italy successfully rallied other European Union nations to reject the French system.

The European Commission was supposed to come up by late 2022 with a label aimed at helping consumer make healthier food choices.

France's Nutri-Score system was initially seen as the front-runner to be used across the 27-nation EU. The front-of-pack nutrition label has already been adopted by Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Spain.

Nutri-Score ranks food products on a green-to-red and A-to-E scale based on their nutritional value, from containing a good amount of protein or fibre to too much salt or saturated fat, but companies are not obligated to use the label.

Some 270 scientists signed a call in March 2021 urging the European Commission "not to yield to pressure groups" and back Nutri-Score, saying it was the only label that had undergone peer-reviews showing its "effectiveness and relevance to consumers and public health".

But the European Commission decided against Nutri-Score, with its deputy director-general of food sustainability, Claire Bury, saying in September that it would not put on the table something that "polarizes the debates".

- 'E' for cheese -

Italy, Cyprus, Greece, the Czech Republic, Romania and Hungary opposed the French system.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who took office in October, had lambasted such food labels as "discriminatory and penalising" for the country's food industry.

"An intensive lobbying campaign against this tool by commercial interests has regrettably muddied the waters and turned a public health debate into a political one," said Emma Calvert, senior food policy officer at European consumers group BEUC.

While the European Commission may still use Nutri-Score for inspiration in devising a system, it is also looking at other labels.

Those include the green or black "Keyhole" system in Nordic countries and one backed by Italy, NutrInform Battery, which takes into account the potential portions of food consumed.

Italy has argued that Nutri-Score is not a good reference because it is based on 100 grams or 100 millilitres of food while certain products such as oil and cheese are consumed in smaller quantities.

Rome worries that labels would be harmful to products that are staples of its Mediterranean diet, including olive oil, cheese, prosciutto and pizza.

Italy's main agriculture association, Coldiretti, has said that Nutri-Score ends up "excluding healthy and natural foods that have been at the table for centuries in favour of artificial products".

In France, the makers of the blue cheese Bleu d'Auvergne refuse to put the label their product, which would get the worst possible grade, a red E, for its salt and fat content.

"How do you explain that Bleu d'Auvergne is classified as E when chips made in oil get an A," said Sebastien Ramade, president of the Auvergne cheese association.

But 875 brands representing 60 percent of the food market in France are using Nutri-Score, the system's founder, nutritionist Serge Hercberg told AFP.

"Some major brands still reject it, but more and more manufacturers are adopting it, some of whom had strongly resisted it in the past," Hercberg said.

"When we look at sales figures, we see that it works and it has had an effect on the reformulation and the improvement of the recipes for thousands of products," he added.

- Chile's strict label -

Time is running short for the commission to propose a label to EU states before the term of the current European Parliament expires next year.

"If the Commission fails to uphold its commitment to propose a mandatory EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition label it will be a major missed opportunity to help European consumers, especially vulnerable ones, to make the healthier choice in the supermarket," Calvert said.

Some members of the European Parliament say artificial foods should be targeted instead.

"The overweight issue among teenagers is not due to eating too much Camembert," said MEP Irene Tolleret.

Elsewhere in the world, Chile has had an even stricter system since 2016, with a black label that warns consumers about high saturated fats, sugar or salt.

Products in Chile that bear the label are barred from advertising on television.

"One of the consequences is that more than 20 percent of products have new formulas," with less salt or sugar, said Guido Girardi, a former senator behind the system who added that similar legislation is in the works in 32 countries.

(H.Schneide--BBZ)