Berliner Boersenzeitung - Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

EUR -
AED 4.127189
AFN 72.488144
ALL 90.959033
AMD 405.219302
ANG 2.011378
AOA 1031.658001
ARS 1736.882499
AUD 1.624648
AWG 2.025667
AZN 1.909796
BAM 1.959278
BBD 2.257607
BDT 139.217123
BGN 1.96423
BHD 0.423251
BIF 3360.480113
BMD 1.12381
BND 1.434653
BOB 13.32141
BRL 6.193991
BSD 1.12089
BTN 105.204748
BWP 15.400858
BYN 3.356258
BYR 22026.673375
BZD 2.254402
CAD 1.587454
CDF 2574.648533
CHF 0.920732
CLF 0.027662
CLP 1088.713242
CNY 7.498961
CNH 7.490698
COP 3681.769693
CRC 507.701216
CUC 1.12381
CUP 26.901753
CVE 110.459109
CZK 24.330539
DJF 199.604316
DKK 7.474617
DOP 68.201063
DZD 152.917826
EGP 60.194969
ERN 16.857148
ETB 181.101852
FJD 2.530597
FKP 0.837412
GBP 0.836171
GEL 2.910871
GGP 0.837412
GHS 13.098017
GIP 0.837412
GMD 83.161866
GNF 9930.672041
GTQ 8.565204
GYD 234.982934
HKD 8.815671
HNL 30.12594
HRK 7.60708
HTG 146.920798
HUF 362.419661
IDR 20327.75381
ILS 3.543097
IMP 0.837412
INR 105.0093
IQD 1702.571947
IRR 2137807.209253
ISK 137.206007
JEP 0.837412
JMD 178.066084
JOD 0.796751
JPY 177.670942
KES 146.005725
KGS 98.277027
KHR 4574.119484
KMF 493.352211
KPW 1011.428836
KRW 1503.483414
KWD 0.349224
KYD 0.934158
KZT 502.902699
LAK 25285.72228
LBP 100377.879988
LKR 372.70158
LRD 190.558258
LSL 18.508945
LTL 3.318318
LVL 0.679781
LYD 7.202786
MAD 10.951144
MDL 20.204865
MGA 5163.906558
MKD 61.549374
MMK 2359.659667
MNT 4047.345118
MOP 9.05317
MRU 45.498765
MUR 52.729462
MVR 17.318108
MWK 1943.650158
MXN 20.746538
MYR 4.555933
MZN 71.822747
NAD 18.508923
NGN 1513.333631
NIO 41.1536
NOK 10.600393
NPR 168.324796
NZD 1.993785
OMR 0.432098
PAB 1.12099
PEN 3.857047
PGK 5.045348
PHP 70.623023
PKR 310.865325
PLN 4.382342
PYG 7006.437072
QAR 4.097473
RON 5.343153
RSD 117.624686
RUB 93.005244
RWF 1658.343713
SAR 4.225993
SBD 9.099824
SCR 15.594276
SDG 675.970589
SEK 10.987466
SGD 1.435684
SHP 0.836199
SLE 25.791802
SLL 23565.735929
SOS 640.63719
SRD 42.201279
STD 23260.595265
STN 24.543567
SVC 9.808411
SYP 14611.775525
SZL 18.427218
THB 37.513108
TJS 10.289966
TMT 3.944573
TND 3.379855
TOP 2.705864
TRY 56.45206
TTD 7.602495
TWD 36.977856
TZS 2972.47485
UAH 51.063452
UGX 4590.066103
USD 1.12381
UYU 45.200235
UZS 13445.867654
VES 1008.260017
VND 28774.589716
VUV 134.858429
WST 3.124307
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021361
XAU 0.0002739523
XCD 3.037152
XCG 2.020186
XDR 0.794592
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 265.783459
ZAR 18.401386
ZMK 10115.639965
ZMW 22.782441
ZWL 361.866318
SSP 6457.203087
MXV 2.331682
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford
Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford / Photo: Prince of Wales - KENSINGTON PALACE/AFP

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

When the UK's Daily Mail, a loyal champion of the monarchy, splashes the headline "How did Kate photo become a PR disaster?", it is clear the royal family has a problem.

Text size:

In an extraordinary episode for the family, Catherine, Princess of Wales, on Monday apologised and admitted to editing an official portrait of her released by the palace on Sunday.

The edits had prompted AFP and other agencies to withdraw the altered image.

Kate, 42, has not been seen at a public event since attending a Christmas Day church service, and underwent abdominal surgery in January, fuelling speculation about her health.

The photograph dominated the front pages of UK newspapers landing on doormats on Monday, which had gone to print before the alterations were detected.

The Sun tabloid ran with the headline "Looking Great, Kate", adding the picture "puts online rumours to bed".

But the rumour mill instead went into overdrive when the photographs were pulled late on Sunday.

Not only has the incident intensified speculation over Catherine's health but it has tested the bond of trust between the royal family and friendly media outlets.

Even the Press Association, which has among the closest working relationships with the monarchy, killed its distribution of the photograph.

Daily Mail columnist Richard Kay warned that "trust and integrity are precious commodities" in maintaining the public support that underpins the institution.

- 'Suspicions' -

Royal-supporting tabloids would normally have "waited for it to blow over", Laura Clancy, lecturer in media at Lancaster University, told AFP.

Other outlets have also often been reluctant to dip into royal controversy over fear they could lose access, she added.

But the rise of social media now means that "people can question and talk about it and there's news outlets around the world who don't stick to that line".

In the digital media age, "any manipulation of an image, even relatively minor edits done with no intention to mislead, can raise suspicions", Chris Morris, chief executive of fact-checking service Full Fact, said in a comment sent to AFP.

Part of the problem is that the family distributes pictures from self-described "amateur photographer" Catherine for use by professional media outlets, which have strict rules on using manipulated images.

While there have been calls to use professionals, "there are some ... individuals whose brand is based on authenticity", explained Hannah Perry, lead digital researcher at the London-based think tank Demos.

But royals must weigh that up against the fact that "trust is so low in public institutions and we know that people are becoming incredibly sceptical and also savvy" about analysing information, she added.

"The best-case scenario in that situation would be to be transparent," suggested Perry.

On the streets of London, public reaction was mixed.

- 'Obsessive need for secrecy' -

"I was actually quite shocked. I would think it would be a lot more seamless coming from such an official source," said 21-year-old student Flora Canavan.

She added that her trust in the royal family had not been eroded as "I don't think I trusted them beforehand".

However, solicitor Jen Chambers said the incident had been "massively blown up out of proportion" and that "the kids probably weren't pulling good faces in the photo".

Although the furore has caused embarrassment for loyal media outlets, they still remain supportive, for now.

The Sun's front page on Tuesday urged "social media trolls, idiotic conspiracy theorists and sniping media critics" to "lay off Kate".

It accused critics of waging "a bullying campaign against a devoted mum, recovering from a serious operation, who simply wanted to offer the public a perfect portrait of her and her kids".

While the Daily Mail's Kay said it was "easy to see why the couple acted as they did", he offered a stark warning.

"They are down to earth and unshowy. But it is this desire for ordinariness which conceals one significant flaw: a near obsessive need for secrecy.

"If pictures can be digitally altered, what else can be twisted? The British public adore the Royal Family but that adoration rests on them being told the truth.

"There are precious commodities at stake here: trust and integrity."

(B.Hartmann--BBZ)