Berliner Boersenzeitung - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.095102
AFN 72.480008
ALL 90.801688
AMD 402.807486
ANG 1.995737
AOA 1023.635334
ARS 1721.721299
AUD 1.61933
AWG 2.007127
AZN 1.900047
BAM 1.955836
BBD 2.250342
BDT 139.162586
BGN 1.948955
BHD 0.422108
BIF 3342.96213
BMD 1.115071
BND 1.431727
BOB 13.402249
BRL 6.138357
BSD 1.117321
BTN 104.873949
BWP 15.391286
BYN 3.345962
BYR 21855.38619
BZD 2.247142
CAD 1.573644
CDF 2586.964483
CHF 0.914162
CLF 0.027822
CLP 1094.980351
CNY 7.444774
CNH 7.438418
COP 3608.76707
CRC 506.709417
CUC 1.115071
CUP 26.815498
CVE 110.267049
CZK 24.346956
DJF 198.963698
DKK 7.480457
DOP 67.891262
DZD 151.940824
EGP 59.957114
ERN 16.726061
ETB 183.378708
FJD 2.526309
FKP 0.834974
GBP 0.834166
GEL 2.893653
GGP 0.834974
GHS 13.055243
GIP 0.834974
GMD 83.077063
GNF 9896.183924
GTQ 8.538159
GYD 234.234353
HKD 8.744429
HNL 30.029558
HRK 7.547925
HTG 146.432722
HUF 363.51345
IDR 20192.258205
ILS 3.552538
IMP 0.834974
INR 104.716854
IQD 1693.83148
IRR 2108992.359359
ISK 136.919964
JEP 0.834974
JMD 177.323296
JOD 0.790629
JPY 176.710877
KES 145.192698
KGS 97.510486
KHR 4552.084602
KMF 492.86165
KPW 1003.563608
KRW 1520.737678
KWD 0.346765
KYD 0.931217
KZT 500.809308
LAK 25136.46717
LBP 100053.859534
LKR 371.556906
LRD 189.94353
LSL 18.477643
LTL 3.292514
LVL 0.674496
LYD 7.150133
MAD 10.921803
MDL 19.971371
MGA 5077.094359
MKD 61.556144
MMK 2341.587311
MNT 4015.514918
MOP 9.019368
MRU 45.108838
MUR 52.442198
MVR 17.176258
MWK 1937.436008
MXN 20.766565
MYR 4.528864
MZN 71.257178
NAD 18.477643
NGN 1502.23485
NIO 41.120764
NOK 10.548462
NPR 167.798119
NZD 2.015128
OMR 0.428348
PAB 1.117421
PEN 3.848972
PGK 5.092095
PHP 70.369926
PKR 309.016043
PLN 4.399568
PYG 6984.129802
QAR 4.084276
RON 5.343646
RSD 117.622186
RUB 91.352798
RWF 1649.13065
SAR 4.188587
SBD 8.974739
SCR 15.358485
SDG 670.719139
SEK 11.033072
SGD 1.430306
SHP 0.835103
SLE 25.591287
SLL 23382.48045
SOS 638.511867
SRD 41.908265
STD 23079.712667
STN 24.500455
SVC 9.776182
SYP 14498.149201
SZL 18.471343
THB 37.411034
TJS 10.307092
TMT 3.902748
TND 3.343362
TOP 2.684822
TRY 55.9111
TTD 7.577141
TWD 36.546782
TZS 2952.454872
UAH 50.616941
UGX 4570.084937
USD 1.115071
UYU 44.950835
UZS 13332.247784
VES 999.456181
VND 28526.296796
VUV 132.393741
WST 3.108622
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021465
XAU 0.000274244363
XCD 3.013535
XCG 2.013637
XDR 0.788413
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.853652
ZAR 18.420333
ZMK 10036.978597
ZMW 22.703422
ZWL 359.052318
SSP 6406.340367
MXV 2.33632
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

(S.G.Stein--BBZ)