Berliner Boersenzeitung - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.260091
AFN 76.559873
ALL 92.876059
AMD 422.828996
ANG 2.076146
AOA 1063.718568
ARS 1734.175498
AUD 1.638104
AWG 2.087998
AZN 1.967892
BAM 1.960115
BBD 2.336684
BDT 141.54159
BGN 1.967782
BHD 0.437461
BIF 3466.518596
BMD 1.159999
BND 1.482301
BOB 13.428562
BRL 6.050203
BSD 1.160174
BTN 110.950769
BWP 15.660746
BYN 3.528753
BYR 22735.973106
BZD 2.333327
CAD 1.609439
CDF 2633.197051
CHF 0.940353
CLF 0.027217
CLP 1071.189085
CNY 7.822216
CNH 7.817979
COP 3601.64494
CRC 521.145005
CUC 1.159999
CUP 30.739964
CVE 110.506364
CZK 24.174604
DJF 206.598369
DKK 7.475861
DOP 68.149731
DZD 154.190504
EGP 58.781423
ERN 17.399979
ETB 187.676142
FJD 2.561915
FKP 0.856537
GBP 0.855905
GEL 3.021794
GGP 0.856537
GHS 12.820278
GIP 0.856537
GMD 85.84003
GNF 10191.391461
GTQ 8.849443
GYD 242.725383
HKD 9.097318
HNL 31.106344
HRK 7.535814
HTG 151.758006
HUF 364.93325
IDR 20699.943514
ILS 3.46318
IMP 0.856537
INR 111.067954
IQD 1519.865494
IRR 1594505.114028
ISK 142.203745
JEP 0.856537
JMD 183.319883
JOD 0.822399
JPY 184.653805
KES 150.31259
KGS 101.442062
KHR 4693.453579
KMF 494.159761
KPW 1043.999106
KRW 1618.117079
KWD 0.358045
KYD 0.966824
KZT 535.837286
LAK 26146.785091
LBP 103892.461668
LKR 385.091062
LRD 210.572648
LSL 18.821358
LTL 3.425175
LVL 0.701672
LYD 7.392401
MAD 10.779677
MDL 20.01297
MGA 4997.086773
MKD 61.66074
MMK 2435.122429
MNT 4172.690093
MOP 9.372955
MRU 46.529229
MUR 54.496842
MVR 17.93377
MWK 2011.798157
MXN 19.764171
MYR 4.711685
MZN 74.129742
NAD 18.821277
NGN 1566.903145
NIO 42.686426
NOK 10.901743
NPR 177.521031
NZD 1.973175
OMR 0.446011
PAB 1.160154
PEN 3.907436
PGK 5.213454
PHP 71.731963
PKR 321.980762
PLN 4.327526
PYG 6999.529487
QAR 4.240817
RON 5.244936
RSD 117.394244
RUB 98.861318
RWF 1709.522302
SAR 4.346035
SBD 9.30993
SCR 15.939157
SDG 697.741843
SEK 11.036912
SGD 1.480872
SHP 0.859404
SLE 28.594027
SLL 24324.59033
SOS 663.082579
SRD 44.041673
STD 24009.629569
STN 24.553947
SVC 10.15126
SYP 15082.30205
SZL 18.807728
THB 38.372638
TJS 10.719853
TMT 4.059995
TND 3.397665
TOP 2.792998
TRY 55.607432
TTD 7.867387
TWD 37.082252
TZS 3072.808558
UAH 51.971406
UGX 4327.545337
USD 1.159999
UYU 46.80283
UZS 13713.306773
VES 895.028087
VND 30365.284081
VUV 137.129801
WST 3.150437
XAF 657.426933
XAG 0.018378
XAU 0.000266
XCD 3.134954
XCG 2.09093
XDR 0.820179
XOF 657.415573
XPF 119.331742
YER 275.056081
ZAR 18.824139
ZMK 10441.378786
ZMW 21.666069
ZWL 373.519085
  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    69

    +0.51%

  • CMSC

    -0.1200

    21.24

    -0.56%

  • NGG

    0.8600

    82.15

    +1.05%

  • BCC

    -1.7600

    80.18

    -2.2%

  • GSK

    0.8700

    51.15

    +1.7%

  • RIO

    -0.5200

    96.69

    -0.54%

  • AZN

    3.2100

    160.1

    +2%

  • RELX

    0.9500

    34.51

    +2.75%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    21.09

    -0.43%

  • BCE

    0.0100

    23.36

    +0.04%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2500

    20.81

    -1.2%

  • JRI

    -0.0400

    12.44

    -0.32%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    16.13

    -0.43%

  • BTI

    0.6500

    56.38

    +1.15%

  • BP

    0.5600

    43.41

    +1.29%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

(S.G.Stein--BBZ)