Berliner Boersenzeitung - FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

EUR -
AED 4.095701
AFN 72.480008
ALL 90.882712
AMD 401.805034
ANG 1.995737
AOA 1023.635334
ARS 1721.721299
AUD 1.622157
AWG 2.007127
AZN 1.900047
BAM 1.951697
BBD 2.245579
BDT 138.86805
BGN 1.948955
BHD 0.420772
BIF 3356.362879
BMD 1.115071
BND 1.428792
BOB 13.374482
BRL 6.138357
BSD 1.114956
BTN 104.659009
BWP 15.359741
BYN 3.339105
BYR 21855.38619
BZD 2.242466
CAD 1.573756
CDF 2586.964483
CHF 0.914881
CLF 0.027698
CLP 1090.127033
CNY 7.444774
CNH 7.440667
COP 3625.685911
CRC 505.646021
CUC 1.115071
CUP 26.76054
CVE 110.842372
CZK 24.346956
DJF 198.170808
DKK 7.480457
DOP 67.740985
DZD 152.081196
EGP 59.957114
ERN 16.726061
ETB 179.75372
FJD 2.514764
FKP 0.833961
GBP 0.834821
GEL 2.893653
GGP 0.833961
GHS 13.029646
GIP 0.833961
GMD 83.077063
GNF 9876.743229
GTQ 8.520088
GYD 233.749058
HKD 8.744552
HNL 30.190584
HRK 7.547925
HTG 146.132606
HUF 363.51345
IDR 20192.258205
ILS 3.552538
IMP 0.833961
INR 104.869336
IQD 1688.217076
IRR 2108992.359359
ISK 136.919964
JEP 0.833961
JMD 176.947992
JOD 0.790629
JPY 176.744329
KES 144.903869
KGS 97.510486
KHR 4549.488945
KMF 492.86165
KPW 1003.563608
KRW 1520.737678
KWD 0.346765
KYD 0.929309
KZT 499.776184
LAK 25094.667032
LBP 99854.583719
LKR 370.763872
LRD 189.90075
LSL 18.465996
LTL 3.292514
LVL 0.674496
LYD 7.170329
MAD 10.880307
MDL 19.93044
MGA 5123.750363
MKD 61.556144
MMK 2341.311039
MNT 4015.078679
MOP 9.000882
MRU 44.882019
MUR 52.442198
MVR 17.176258
MWK 1936.878232
MXN 20.768572
MYR 4.528864
MZN 71.257178
NAD 18.465992
NGN 1502.23485
NIO 40.823159
NOK 10.548462
NPR 167.454215
NZD 2.010586
OMR 0.428348
PAB 1.115031
PEN 3.838635
PGK 5.008941
PHP 70.369926
PKR 308.456482
PLN 4.399568
PYG 6968.50605
QAR 4.062245
RON 5.343646
RSD 117.7359
RUB 91.352798
RWF 1644.729318
SAR 4.18675
SBD 8.974739
SCR 15.631155
SDG 670.719139
SEK 11.033072
SGD 1.430194
SHP 0.835103
SLE 25.591287
SLL 23382.48045
SOS 637.267002
SRD 41.908265
STD 23079.712667
STN 24.8382
SVC 9.75549
SYP 14498.149201
SZL 18.465983
THB 37.411034
TJS 10.285553
TMT 3.902748
TND 3.329048
TOP 2.684822
TRY 55.9111
TTD 7.561104
TWD 36.546782
TZS 2946.578434
UAH 50.509358
UGX 4560.432794
USD 1.115071
UYU 44.855697
UZS 13380.84906
VES 999.456181
VND 28526.296796
VUV 133.25575
WST 3.108617
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021465
XAU 0.000274244363
XCD 3.013535
XCG 2.009331
XDR 0.788413
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.853652
ZAR 18.419263
ZMK 10036.978597
ZMW 22.65679
ZWL 359.052318
SSP 6406.644798
MXV 2.336546
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks
FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

The aggressive mobilisation of Foreign Currency Non-Resident Bank [FCNR(B)] deposits increasingly weighed on bank margins during the September quarter, with private lenders bearing a disproportionate impact owing to their larger participation in the RBI’s FCNR(B) drive.

Text size:

The aggressive mobilisation of Foreign Currency Non-Resident Bank [FCNR(B)] deposits increasingly weighed on bank margins during the September quarter, with private lenders bearing a disproportionate impact owing to their larger participation in the RBI’s FCNR(B) drive.

A comparison of the September quarter earnings shows that private banks, despite reporting stronger loan and deposit growth, witnessed sharper compression in net interest margins (NIMs) than most public sector peers.

Among private banks, Kotak Mahindra Bank reported the steepest decline, with NIM falling 44 basis points year-on-year to 4.1%. Axis Bank’s NIM declined 37 basis points to 3.36%, while ICICI Bank’s margin slipped 12 basis points to 4.18%. HDFC Bank, the largest private lender, recorded a 14 basis point decline in NIM to 3.16%.

PSU resilience

In contrast, PSU banks displayed greater resilience. Union Bank of India reported NIM expansion of 19 basis points to 2.86%, while Central Bank of India’s margin improved 12 basis points to 3.01%. Bank of India’s NIM declined by a modest six basis points to 2.41%.

“The impact has been far more pronounced for private banks because their FCNR(B) mobilisation was significantly higher relative to their existing deposit base. While PSU banks mobilised FCNR(B) deposits equivalent to roughly 2-2.5% of deposits, private lenders such as ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and Axis Bank raised FCNR(B) deposits amounting to about 7.5-10% of their deposit base. As a result, a larger pool of funds remained parked in lower-yielding assets pending deployment, leading to greater pressure on margins.” said Siddharth Rajpurohit, Lead Analyst - Banking and non-lending financials, Systematix Group.

“FCNR(B) inflows created a near-term pressure on margins as we carried excess liquidity during the quarter, said Ashok Vaswani, MD & CEO, Kotak Mahindra Bank during the media call. “The funds have been used to replace costlier borrowings and support growth opportunities. As the remaining liquidity is deployed into higher-yielding assets and repo-linked loans are repriced, we expect the margin impact to gradually moderate while NIMs remain broadly stable through the second half of the year,” he said.

Anshul Chandak, Head Treasury, RBL Bank, said the margin impact is temporary and reflects the cost of raising and hedging these deposits before they are fully deployed.

“From next quarter, you will start seeing improvement in NIMs,” Chandak said. He noted while FCNR(B) deposits initially weigh on margins because of their cost structure, the drag should ease as banks deploy the funds and balance sheets adjust.

Narrowing gap

For most banks, the impact is projected to normalise by the December quarter. However, lenders that raised FCNR(B) deposits disproportionately relative to their balance-sheet size could take longer to absorb the costs. Analysts expect the gap to narrow over the next two quarters as FCNR(B) funds are deployed and hedging costs stabilise. Until then, the banks that led the FCNR(B) mobilisation drive are likely to continue reporting a greater impact on margins than their state-owned peers.

“The FCNR(B)-related drag on margins is temporary,” said Rajpurohit. “Some impact could still persist in the December quarter as banks continue deploying these funds, but the pressure should start easing as the excess liquidity is put to work and repo-rate transmission normalises. By the fourth quarter, margins should largely stabilise, with the benefits of asset repricing and improved deployment of FCNR(B) funds helping offset the earlier drag,” he said.

(L.Kaufmann--BBZ)