Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 4.255899
AFN 72.432944
ALL 95.975736
AMD 435.816867
ANG 2.074448
AOA 1062.670738
ARS 1619.00736
AUD 1.664418
AWG 2.08594
AZN 1.965411
BAM 1.956316
BBD 2.328224
BDT 141.837422
BGN 1.980843
BHD 0.437657
BIF 3428.619402
BMD 1.158856
BND 1.478997
BOB 7.988142
BRL 6.101215
BSD 1.15601
BTN 108.040972
BWP 15.796236
BYN 3.442123
BYR 22713.57276
BZD 2.324923
CAD 1.593809
CDF 2634.079447
CHF 0.912802
CLF 0.026896
CLP 1062.021594
CNY 7.973508
CNH 7.993474
COP 4302.147686
CRC 539.144574
CUC 1.158856
CUP 30.709677
CVE 110.294576
CZK 24.480538
DJF 205.855201
DKK 7.471357
DOP 68.598395
DZD 153.754179
EGP 61.083375
ERN 17.382836
ETB 180.492
FJD 2.575846
FKP 0.865723
GBP 0.865196
GEL 3.146334
GGP 0.865723
GHS 12.646391
GIP 0.865723
GMD 84.596598
GNF 10132.71714
GTQ 8.854374
GYD 241.844852
HKD 9.068017
HNL 30.597205
HRK 7.534884
HTG 151.410602
HUF 390.142677
IDR 19561.832769
ILS 3.618985
IMP 0.865723
INR 108.642205
IQD 1514.39956
IRR 1523953.258404
ISK 143.790433
JEP 0.865723
JMD 182.078825
JOD 0.821607
JPY 183.961977
KES 150.191349
KGS 101.3402
KHR 4632.242159
KMF 492.513609
KPW 1042.936742
KRW 1735.867428
KWD 0.35505
KYD 0.96335
KZT 557.168924
LAK 24847.663027
LBP 103523.360316
LKR 363.007342
LRD 211.546727
LSL 19.601456
LTL 3.4218
LVL 0.70098
LYD 7.399984
MAD 10.804997
MDL 20.218422
MGA 4811.290172
MKD 61.619088
MMK 2433.167084
MNT 4135.923012
MOP 9.326861
MRU 46.146374
MUR 53.891919
MVR 17.904411
MWK 2004.13742
MXN 20.722312
MYR 4.585017
MZN 74.062945
NAD 19.59968
NGN 1592.476153
NIO 42.541408
NOK 11.233374
NPR 172.865355
NZD 1.98862
OMR 0.445586
PAB 1.15601
PEN 4.021461
PGK 4.991338
PHP 69.408484
PKR 322.693232
PLN 4.27397
PYG 7554.02565
QAR 4.227234
RON 5.094316
RSD 117.444213
RUB 93.641229
RWF 1690.053196
SAR 4.350082
SBD 9.330779
SCR 16.087553
SDG 696.472444
SEK 10.811603
SGD 1.483057
SHP 0.869442
SLE 28.449668
SLL 24300.638259
SOS 660.677164
SRD 43.267618
STD 23985.974368
STN 24.506572
SVC 10.114625
SYP 128.606968
SZL 19.594254
THB 37.747988
TJS 11.045462
TMT 4.055995
TND 3.406714
TOP 2.790246
TRY 51.392106
TTD 7.847393
TWD 37.073181
TZS 2978.258958
UAH 50.757111
UGX 4364.170274
USD 1.158856
UYU 47.102631
UZS 14093.718494
VES 529.022698
VND 30543.961084
VUV 138.434854
WST 3.185549
XAF 656.132945
XAG 0.016646
XAU 0.000263
XCD 3.131866
XCG 2.083341
XDR 0.816019
XOF 656.132945
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.560932
ZAR 19.76266
ZMK 10431.128864
ZMW 22.397006
ZWL 373.15108
  • CMSD

    -0.1000

    22.64

    -0.44%

  • GSK

    0.6000

    52.59

    +1.14%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    22.88

    0%

  • RIO

    0.6700

    86.51

    +0.77%

  • RELX

    -1.0900

    32.72

    -3.33%

  • BCE

    0.1850

    25.945

    +0.71%

  • BTI

    0.3600

    58.28

    +0.62%

  • NGG

    0.7900

    82.85

    +0.95%

  • AZN

    1.1200

    185.19

    +0.6%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5000

    15.55

    -3.22%

  • BP

    1.1100

    44.68

    +2.48%

  • JRI

    0.3050

    11.985

    +2.54%

  • BCC

    1.7200

    73.6

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.1700

    14.65

    +1.16%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

(F.Schuster--BBZ)