Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 4.198299
AFN 72.583816
ALL 94.019914
AMD 420.704666
ANG 2.046432
AOA 1049.274168
ARS 1670.45311
AUD 1.632462
AWG 2.057401
AZN 1.939879
BAM 1.952061
BBD 2.302989
BDT 140.470942
BGN 1.932678
BHD 0.430854
BIF 3411.85707
BMD 1.143001
BND 1.478768
BOB 7.900867
BRL 5.896059
BSD 1.14341
BTN 108.191769
BWP 15.518276
BYN 3.199272
BYR 22402.813593
BZD 2.299695
CAD 1.618758
CDF 2588.896631
CHF 0.924596
CLF 0.026327
CLP 1036.164256
CNY 7.737658
CNH 7.746767
COP 3936.631549
CRC 518.706468
CUC 1.143001
CUP 30.289518
CVE 110.054202
CZK 24.196125
DJF 203.133759
DKK 7.47443
DOP 66.841971
DZD 152.617101
EGP 56.886119
ERN 17.14501
ETB 184.3477
FJD 2.569179
FKP 0.86376
GBP 0.862983
GEL 3.028998
GGP 0.86376
GHS 12.835415
GIP 0.86376
GMD 84.020825
GNF 10018.809946
GTQ 8.719299
GYD 239.201832
HKD 8.960612
HNL 30.589409
HRK 7.534667
HTG 149.363908
HUF 352.275669
IDR 20397.647477
ILS 3.396255
IMP 0.86376
INR 108.10552
IQD 1497.930859
IRR 1571625.953592
ISK 144.006235
JEP 0.86376
JMD 180.673937
JOD 0.810347
JPY 184.599152
KES 147.950338
KGS 99.95507
KHR 4591.205992
KMF 490.916285
KPW 1028.701024
KRW 1756.82062
KWD 0.352799
KYD 0.952875
KZT 557.312522
LAK 25252.631045
LBP 102395.671068
LKR 382.337669
LRD 208.111383
LSL 18.787415
LTL 3.374984
LVL 0.69139
LYD 7.310307
MAD 10.659483
MDL 20.107486
MGA 4822.762468
MKD 61.647195
MMK 2400.2077
MNT 4091.064279
MOP 9.233115
MRU 45.720427
MUR 54.646421
MVR 17.670543
MWK 1984.24915
MXN 19.840075
MYR 4.743112
MZN 73.041041
NAD 18.787415
NGN 1562.173531
NIO 42.079401
NOK 11.081275
NPR 173.106431
NZD 2.000579
OMR 0.439488
PAB 1.14341
PEN 3.869089
PGK 5.094242
PHP 69.879064
PKR 318.021261
PLN 4.275383
PYG 6970.648402
QAR 4.168416
RON 5.237913
RSD 117.41016
RUB 84.863008
RWF 1674.69229
SAR 4.290586
SBD 9.214213
SCR 15.629856
SDG 686.359388
SEK 10.991398
SGD 1.478329
SHP 0.853365
SLE 28.289887
SLL 23968.157231
SOS 653.448383
SRD 42.783084
STD 23657.806647
STN 24.453162
SVC 10.004837
SYP 126.338264
SZL 18.783023
THB 37.661299
TJS 10.605486
TMT 4.000502
TND 3.380924
TOP 2.752072
TRY 53.102442
TTD 7.754148
TWD 36.167989
TZS 3004.071008
UAH 51.425699
UGX 4174.0051
USD 1.143001
UYU 45.722423
UZS 13703.751799
VES 693.381551
VND 30083.778254
VUV 135.276765
WST 3.145305
XAF 654.70298
XAG 0.017475
XAU 0.000273
XCD 3.089016
XCG 2.060753
XDR 0.813463
XOF 653.79697
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.702952
ZAR 18.739068
ZMK 10288.378745
ZMW 20.26718
ZWL 368.045757
  • BCC

    -1.7350

    72.925

    -2.38%

  • CMSC

    -0.2100

    22.16

    -0.95%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.66

    -0.08%

  • RIO

    -1.0800

    99

    -1.09%

  • CMSD

    -0.2200

    22.07

    -1%

  • RBGPF

    0.3600

    61.5

    +0.59%

  • RYCEF

    0.1900

    18.45

    +1.03%

  • GSK

    0.1350

    50.805

    +0.27%

  • BCE

    -0.5050

    22.775

    -2.22%

  • NGG

    1.4500

    80.89

    +1.79%

  • BP

    0.6200

    39.72

    +1.56%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    14.14

    -1.13%

  • RELX

    -0.2950

    30.885

    -0.96%

  • AZN

    1.5250

    176.455

    +0.86%

  • BTI

    0.2100

    59.12

    +0.36%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

(F.Schuster--BBZ)