Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 4.1039
AFN 71.518282
ALL 90.596933
AMD 402.732664
ANG 2.000029
AOA 1024.718441
ARS 1726.552642
AUD 1.624806
AWG 2.014237
AZN 1.905291
BAM 1.949726
BBD 2.25317
BDT 139.335896
BGN 1.953146
BHD 0.422281
BIF 3343.154414
BMD 1.117469
BND 1.428131
BOB 13.507795
BRL 6.138144
BSD 1.118715
BTN 105.631594
BWP 15.326114
BYN 3.337796
BYR 21902.38266
BZD 2.24987
CAD 1.57139
CDF 2586.939653
CHF 0.914743
CLF 0.027788
CLP 1093.51018
CNY 7.47419
CNH 7.452761
COP 3622.587044
CRC 507.31491
CUC 1.117469
CUP 26.847994
CVE 109.919102
CZK 24.354329
DJF 199.209359
DKK 7.475339
DOP 67.180098
DZD 152.247158
EGP 60.143721
ERN 16.762028
ETB 183.605829
FJD 2.530004
FKP 0.828775
GBP 0.833827
GEL 2.910992
GGP 0.828775
GHS 13.049228
GIP 0.828775
GMD 83.254541
GNF 9908.906907
GTQ 8.549097
GYD 234.387663
HKD 8.757819
HNL 30.067056
HRK 7.564155
HTG 146.611915
HUF 364.211482
IDR 20227.241501
ILS 3.571767
IMP 0.828775
INR 104.968454
IQD 1695.901207
IRR 2113527.40639
ISK 136.78913
JEP 0.828775
JMD 177.435608
JOD 0.792281
JPY 176.900881
KES 145.181654
KGS 97.720161
KHR 4551.818712
KMF 492.803438
KPW 1005.721609
KRW 1517.879473
KWD 0.347309
KYD 0.932283
KZT 502.996153
LAK 25177.22187
LBP 100465.766297
LKR 371.906326
LRD 190.174953
LSL 18.332084
LTL 3.299594
LVL 0.675945
LYD 7.161688
MAD 10.901937
MDL 20.000703
MGA 5072.152212
MKD 61.554642
MMK 2346.631266
MNT 4025.090542
MOP 9.039456
MRU 45.19479
MUR 52.555195
MVR 17.270463
MWK 1939.839031
MXN 20.883218
MYR 4.535845
MZN 71.4175
NAD 18.332738
NGN 1505.218973
NIO 41.17081
NOK 10.504774
NPR 169.013921
NZD 2.015438
OMR 0.429658
PAB 1.118705
PEN 3.853295
PGK 5.096077
PHP 70.413971
PKR 309.398892
PLN 4.393992
PYG 6892.526188
QAR 4.089132
RON 5.341167
RSD 117.652691
RUB 91.464807
RWF 1647.851338
SAR 4.194588
SBD 8.997541
SCR 15.361079
SDG 672.159515
SEK 11.026587
SGD 1.431863
SHP 0.833123
SLE 25.601046
SLL 23432.76069
SOS 639.302518
SRD 41.968771
STD 23129.341854
STN 24.423689
SVC 9.788373
SYP 14529.325125
SZL 18.325742
THB 37.482088
TJS 10.31981
TMT 3.922314
TND 3.33341
TOP 2.690596
TRY 56.049651
TTD 7.576294
TWD 36.589831
TZS 2954.212401
UAH 50.816625
UGX 4524.862203
USD 1.117469
UYU 45.059415
UZS 13349.290541
VES 998.7587
VND 28587.63798
VUV 133.552417
WST 3.104903
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.021457
XAU 0.000274761437
XCD 3.020015
XCG 2.016101
XDR 0.790108
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.918097
ZAR 18.459473
ZMK 10058.569965
ZMW 22.681133
ZWL 359.824402
SSP 6420.075745
MXV 2.349444
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

(F.Schuster--BBZ)