Berliner Boersenzeitung - New study reinforces theory Covid emerged at Chinese market

EUR -
AED 4.239393
AFN 76.187455
ALL 93.17114
AMD 421.618341
AOA 1059.703963
ARS 1727.213601
AUD 1.639217
AWG 2.080736
AZN 1.99717
BAM 1.953568
BBD 2.321548
BDT 142.677005
BHD 0.434694
BIF 3439.426093
BMD 1.154361
BND 1.477992
BOB 13.999007
BRL 5.913559
BSD 1.152658
BTN 109.581813
BWP 15.630737
BYN 3.409105
BYR 22625.480557
BZD 2.318242
CAD 1.617168
CDF 2610.011457
CHF 0.933353
CLF 0.026721
CLP 1055.109333
CNY 7.79265
CNH 7.791546
COP 3673.881667
CRC 522.691555
CUC 1.154361
CUP 30.590573
CVE 110.139177
CZK 24.180463
DJF 205.251075
DKK 7.475355
DOP 67.221459
DZD 153.497698
EGP 57.432011
ERN 17.315419
ETB 186.038334
FJD 2.553967
FKP 0.857481
GBP 0.857373
GEL 3.018718
GGP 0.857481
GHS 13.514561
GIP 0.857481
GMD 84.845162
GNF 10124.083393
GTQ 8.791956
GYD 241.124538
HKD 9.054775
HNL 30.893904
HRK 7.535207
HTG 150.703267
HUF 363.227272
IDR 20683.84493
ILS 3.477857
IMP 0.857481
INR 109.853402
IQD 1509.981531
IRR 1587015.850814
ISK 141.789703
JEP 0.857481
JMD 183.165198
JOD 0.818473
JPY 182.195114
KES 149.373012
KGS 100.948559
KHR 4671.521595
KMF 492.911771
KRW 1644.468592
KWD 0.356651
KYD 0.960607
KZT 540.904411
LAK 26056.345982
LBP 103219.381749
LKR 386.741231
LRD 208.05232
LSL 18.909879
LTL 3.408529
LVL 0.698261
LYD 7.33646
MAD 10.743027
MDL 20.027208
MGA 4906.267554
MKD 61.454794
MMK 2423.516623
MNT 4150.898625
MOP 9.312302
MRU 46.220597
MUR 54.185979
MVR 17.834424
MWK 1998.656128
MXN 19.918699
MYR 4.720872
MZN 73.775025
NAD 18.909879
NGN 1571.535555
NIO 42.420069
NOK 11.004093
NPR 175.32615
NZD 1.964048
OMR 0.443836
PAB 1.152683
PEN 3.901942
PGK 5.167939
PHP 70.252174
PKR 320.052553
PLN 4.297219
PYG 6873.998246
QAR 4.214086
RON 5.248764
RSD 117.354656
RUB 94.13771
RWF 1693.214327
SAR 4.331774
SBD 9.313789
SCR 16.730772
SDG 693.190222
SEK 10.936499
SGD 1.479678
SLE 28.401485
SOS 658.727494
SRD 43.482446
STD 23892.947289
STN 24.471302
SVC 10.085522
SZL 18.893924
THB 38.161453
TJS 10.638946
TMT 4.040264
TND 3.382136
TRY 54.928317
TTD 7.817917
TWD 37.252394
TZS 3059.054979
UAH 51.580034
UGX 4299.088703
USD 1.154361
UYU 46.347053
UZS 13702.346382
VES 870.632244
VND 30284.090289
VUV 137.76641
WST 3.150502
XAF 655.188645
XAG 0.018634
XAU 0.00027
XCD 3.119719
XCG 2.077336
XDR 0.814848
XOF 655.194314
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.439379
ZAR 18.840965
ZMK 10390.63435
ZMW 22.003863
ZWL 371.703852
  • RYCEF

    0.6000

    21

    +2.86%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.74

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    21.73

    -0.28%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.67

    -0.39%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    80.26

    -0.2%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    15.31

    -2.48%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    22.04

    +0.09%

  • BCC

    -1.6900

    84.8

    -1.99%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    22.06

    +0.27%

  • RIO

    2.5000

    101.51

    +2.46%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    36.61

    -0.52%

  • BP

    -1.2300

    41.21

    -2.98%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    59.27

    +0.25%

  • GSK

    -0.0700

    51.46

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    5.8800

    161.5

    +3.64%

New study reinforces theory Covid emerged at Chinese market
New study reinforces theory Covid emerged at Chinese market / Photo: Greg Baker - AFP/File

New study reinforces theory Covid emerged at Chinese market

A study on the origin of Covid-19 provided new evidence on Thursday supporting the theory that humans first caught the virus from infected animals at a Chinese market in late 2019.

Text size:

Nearly five years after Covid first emerged, the international community has not been able to determine with certainty exactly where the virus came from.

The first cases were detected in the Chinese city of Wuhan in late 2019, but there have been bitter disputes between proponents of the two main theories.

One is that the virus leaked from a Wuhan lab which studied related viruses, while the other is that people caught Covid from an infected wild animal being sold at a local market.

The scientific community has favoured the latter theory, but the controversy has rumbled on.

The study published in the Cell journal is based on more than 800 samples collected at Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Market, where wild mammals were also believed to have been for sale.

The samples were collected in January 2020 after the market was shuttered, and were not taken directly from animals or people but from the surfaces of stalls selling wildlife, as well as from drains.

From this type of data, which was shared by the Chinese authorities, "we cannot say with certainty whether the animals (at the market) were infected or not," study co-author Florence Debarre told AFP.

However, "our study confirms that there were wild animals at this market at the end of 2019, notably belonging to species such as raccoon dogs and civets," said the evolutionary biologist at France's CNRS research agency.

"And these animals were in the southwest corner of the market, which also happens to be an area where a lot of SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes Covid-19, was detected."

These small mammals can catch similar viruses to humans, which has made them suspects for serving as an intermediate host between humans and bats, in which SARS-CoV-2 is suspected to have originated.

The presence of these animals at the Huanan market had previously been disputed, despite some photographic evidence and a 2021 study.

- 'Very strong evidence' -

Numerous parts of one stall tested positive for the Covid virus, including "animal carts, a cage, a garbage cart, and a hair/feather removal machine," the study said.

"There was more DNA from mammalian wildlife species in these samples than human DNA," it added.

Mammal DNA was found in the Covid-positive samples from this stall, including from palm civets, bamboo rats and raccoon dogs.

"These data indicate either that the animals present at this stall shed the SARS-CoV-2 detected on the animal equipment or that early unreported human case(s) of Covid-19 shed virus in the exact same location as the detected animals," the study said.

The research also confirms that the "most recent common ancestor" of the Covid virus strain found in the market samples was "genetically identical" to the original pandemic strain.

"This means that the early diversity of the virus is found at the market -- as would be expected if this is the site where it emerged," Debarre explained.

James Wood, an infectious disease epidemiologist at Cambridge University not involved in the research, said the study "provides very strong evidence for wildlife stalls in the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan being a hotspot for the emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic."

The research was important because "little or nothing has been done to limit either the live trade in wildlife nor the biodiversity loss or land use changes that are the actual likely drivers of past and future pandemic emergence," he said.

"These aspects are also not included in the draft pandemic treaty" currently being negotiated by countries, he added.

(U.Gruber--BBZ)