Berliner Boersenzeitung - Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?

EUR -
AED 4.241201
AFN 76.219915
ALL 93.210974
AMD 421.7986
AOA 1060.156793
ARS 1727.958172
AUD 1.63908
AWG 2.081626
AZN 1.959559
BAM 1.954403
BBD 2.32254
BDT 142.738005
BHD 0.43488
BIF 3440.896583
BMD 1.154855
BND 1.478624
BOB 14.004993
BRL 5.916207
BSD 1.153151
BTN 109.628664
BWP 15.63742
BYN 3.410563
BYR 22635.15384
BZD 2.319233
CAD 1.618125
CDF 2611.126427
CHF 0.932311
CLF 0.026733
CLP 1055.559908
CNY 7.795147
CNH 7.793913
COP 3675.544784
CRC 522.915026
CUC 1.154855
CUP 30.603652
CVE 110.186265
CZK 24.201154
DJF 205.338828
DKK 7.47541
DOP 67.250199
DZD 153.530983
EGP 57.54318
ERN 17.322822
ETB 186.117873
FJD 2.553963
FKP 0.857848
GBP 0.857774
GEL 3.019946
GGP 0.857848
GHS 13.520339
GIP 0.857848
GMD 84.878181
GNF 10128.411837
GTQ 8.795715
GYD 241.227629
HKD 9.058306
HNL 30.907112
HRK 7.534038
HTG 150.767698
HUF 362.223087
IDR 20682.294394
ILS 3.477385
IMP 0.857848
INR 109.932764
IQD 1510.627108
IRR 1587694.361999
ISK 141.792902
JEP 0.857848
JMD 183.243508
JOD 0.818791
JPY 182.181232
KES 149.439303
KGS 100.991685
KHR 4673.518854
KMF 493.12343
KRW 1638.640772
KWD 0.357023
KYD 0.961017
KZT 541.135669
LAK 26067.486096
LBP 103263.512096
LKR 386.906578
LRD 208.141271
LSL 18.917964
LTL 3.409986
LVL 0.69856
LYD 7.339597
MAD 10.74762
MDL 20.03577
MGA 4908.365176
MKD 61.481068
MMK 2424.552772
MNT 4152.673297
MOP 9.316283
MRU 46.240358
MUR 54.209096
MVR 17.842347
MWK 1999.510632
MXN 19.917775
MYR 4.721853
MZN 73.807157
NAD 18.917964
NGN 1572.381111
NIO 42.438205
NOK 11.00856
NPR 175.401109
NZD 1.964222
OMR 0.444037
PAB 1.153176
PEN 3.903611
PGK 5.170149
PHP 70.148769
PKR 320.189388
PLN 4.30117
PYG 6876.93715
QAR 4.215887
RON 5.244777
RSD 117.358631
RUB 93.515578
RWF 1693.938243
SAR 4.333626
SBD 9.317771
SCR 16.99798
SDG 693.483603
SEK 10.953417
SGD 1.479663
SLE 28.408276
SOS 659.009126
SRD 43.501064
STD 23903.162464
STN 24.481764
SVC 10.089834
SZL 18.902002
THB 38.159872
TJS 10.643495
TMT 4.041992
TND 3.383582
TRY 54.964638
TTD 7.82126
TWD 37.289687
TZS 3055.166026
UAH 51.602087
UGX 4300.926733
USD 1.154855
UYU 46.366868
UZS 13708.204675
VES 871.004473
VND 30288.376519
VUV 137.825311
WST 3.151849
XAF 655.468764
XAG 0.018606
XAU 0.000271
XCD 3.121053
XCG 2.078224
XDR 0.815196
XOF 655.474435
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.556256
ZAR 18.867557
ZMK 10395.078432
ZMW 22.01327
ZWL 371.86277
  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    21.73

    -0.28%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.74

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.6000

    21

    +2.86%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    59.27

    +0.25%

  • AZN

    5.8800

    161.5

    +3.64%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    22.06

    +0.27%

  • GSK

    -0.0700

    51.46

    -0.14%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    80.26

    -0.2%

  • RIO

    2.5000

    101.51

    +2.46%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    36.61

    -0.52%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    22.04

    +0.09%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    15.31

    -2.48%

  • BCC

    -1.6900

    84.8

    -1.99%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.67

    -0.39%

  • BP

    -1.2300

    41.21

    -2.98%

Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?
Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover? / Photo: Hector RETAMAL - AFP/File

Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?

Whether Covid-19 was unleashed by a laboratory mishap or spilled over from animals remains an enduring, fiercely contested mystery.

Text size:

Here are the leading arguments that fuel both sides of this debate, as AFP reflects on the virus's impact five years after it reshaped the world.

- The case for lab leak -

Proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis highlight that the earliest known Covid-19 cases emerged in Wuhan, China -- home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a major hub for coronavirus research -- located roughly 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from the nearest bat populations carrying similar SARS-like viruses.

"Wuhan labs performed research that placed them on a trajectory to obtain SARS viruses having high pandemic potential," Richard Ebright, a microbiologist and professor at Rutgers University, told AFP.

"One year before the outbreak, Wuhan labs proposed research to obtain SARS viruses having even higher pandemic potential and features that match, in detail, the features of SARS CoV-2," he added.

This research proposal included engineering a structure called a "furin cleavage site," which increases viral growth and transmissibility but is absent in other SARS viruses.

Lab-leak advocates also cite concerns over biosafety standards at the Wuhan lab, where personnel reportedly only wore lab coats and gloves.

"There is sufficient evidence to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a research-related incident," Ebright concluded.

- The case for natural spillover -

On the other side, researchers like Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, argue that real-world "hard evidence" consistently points to a wholesale seafood market in Wuhan.

"We've actually been looking at an evidence base that is hard evidence. It's evidence that can be measured," she told AFP, including genomic, geographic and environmental sampling data.

She contends that the case for a lab origin, by contrast, is built on "what ifs" and speculation. That would include claims that proposals for research on ways to greatly increase virus transmissibility were publicly rejected but secretly carried out.

This perspective is supported by multiple studies, including one published in the prestigious journal Science that analyzed the geographic pattern of Covid-19 cases during December 2019. The study showed cases were tightly clustered around Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.

Another study, which examined genomic data from the earliest cases, concluded that the virus likely did not circulate widely in humans before November 2019.

More recently, in September 2024, a study published in Cell identified raccoon dogs, palm civets, Amur hedgehogs, and bamboo rats at the market.

Notably, raccoon dogs, which are closely related to foxes, are known to carry and transmit viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting they could have acted as intermediaries between bats and humans.

For Rasmussen, the appeal of the lab-leak theory reflects a desire for straightforward answers. If the blame lies with wayward scientists or China, she argues, people will believe in the possibility of straightforward fixes.

- Where things stand now -

One thing is certain: the lab-leak theory, once dismissed as a conspiracy theory, has gained mainstream traction. For now, the debate remains unresolved -- scientifically and politically.

Some US agencies, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Energy, support the lab-leak theory, albeit with varying levels of confidence, while most elements of the intelligence community lean toward natural origins.

Lab-leak proponents, such as Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute and author of "Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19," continue to advocate for the full declassification of intelligence data and an independent investigation in China beyond the 2021 World Health Organization probe.

"There are many aspects of the pandemic that have damaged public trust in science and health institutions," Chan told AFP. "The origin of the pandemic is one of these."

(A.Berg--BBZ)