Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.308835
AFN 74.49196
ALL 95.752485
AMD 433.698247
ANG 2.100015
AOA 1077.060107
ARS 1634.062666
AUD 1.619899
AWG 2.111883
AZN 1.991476
BAM 1.958911
BBD 2.358165
BDT 143.658162
BGN 1.957131
BHD 0.442705
BIF 3484.13359
BMD 1.173268
BND 1.495075
BOB 8.089849
BRL 5.759602
BSD 1.17087
BTN 111.500038
BWP 15.911271
BYN 3.314593
BYR 22996.060933
BZD 2.35476
CAD 1.595434
CDF 2716.116648
CHF 0.915365
CLF 0.026988
CLP 1062.183556
CNY 8.013834
CNH 8.000259
COP 4358.938548
CRC 532.648236
CUC 1.173268
CUP 31.091613
CVE 110.440404
CZK 24.380163
DJF 208.492911
DKK 7.47298
DOP 69.761094
DZD 155.38575
EGP 63.060593
ERN 17.599026
ETB 184.261902
FJD 2.563476
FKP 0.866879
GBP 0.863766
GEL 3.156259
GGP 0.866879
GHS 13.124845
GIP 0.866879
GMD 85.648623
GNF 10275.319526
GTQ 8.935325
GYD 244.949034
HKD 9.19332
HNL 31.122562
HRK 7.53602
HTG 153.233369
HUF 360.376445
IDR 20420.267455
ILS 3.43574
IMP 0.866879
INR 111.62728
IQD 1536.981624
IRR 1544021.234685
ISK 143.209371
JEP 0.866879
JMD 184.242619
JOD 0.831829
JPY 183.53262
KES 151.589327
KGS 102.567717
KHR 4696.459037
KMF 493.360307
KPW 1055.94532
KRW 1706.712534
KWD 0.361378
KYD 0.975658
KZT 544.048709
LAK 25711.054095
LBP 105065.228965
LKR 374.668251
LRD 214.84305
LSL 19.594087
LTL 3.464356
LVL 0.709699
LYD 7.42786
MAD 10.821086
MDL 20.208268
MGA 4880.796414
MKD 61.7262
MMK 2463.519483
MNT 4198.666619
MOP 9.45069
MRU 46.750649
MUR 54.885322
MVR 18.132862
MWK 2030.224454
MXN 20.305407
MYR 4.635602
MZN 74.97463
NAD 19.594087
NGN 1602.415095
NIO 43.070698
NOK 10.817069
NPR 178.399098
NZD 1.973918
OMR 0.451147
PAB 1.17086
PEN 4.104719
PGK 5.091086
PHP 72.05921
PKR 326.276691
PLN 4.243201
PYG 7094.32786
QAR 4.278502
RON 5.235247
RSD 117.384344
RUB 88.582143
RWF 1711.918913
SAR 4.401895
SBD 9.423995
SCR 16.802622
SDG 704.5479
SEK 10.819729
SGD 1.492673
SHP 0.875963
SLE 28.891716
SLL 24602.847529
SOS 669.162781
SRD 43.970569
STD 24284.28737
STN 24.538973
SVC 10.244358
SYP 129.682209
SZL 19.589779
THB 38.039123
TJS 10.94718
TMT 4.112306
TND 3.390157
TOP 2.824949
TRY 53.075266
TTD 7.936673
TWD 36.97966
TZS 3051.592546
UAH 51.453219
UGX 4420.019989
USD 1.173268
UYU 47.135018
UZS 14108.552463
VES 579.000876
VND 30880.424682
VUV 139.061086
WST 3.186516
XAF 657.000465
XAG 0.015467
XAU 0.000252
XCD 3.170816
XCG 2.110069
XDR 0.817098
XOF 656.445742
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.934303
ZAR 19.371072
ZMK 10560.814925
ZMW 22.099287
ZWL 377.791951
  • BCC

    -2.2000

    72.13

    -3.05%

  • CMSC

    0.0099

    22.88

    +0.04%

  • BCE

    0.1700

    24.1

    +0.71%

  • JRI

    0.1100

    13.04

    +0.84%

  • RIO

    1.8700

    100.5

    +1.86%

  • RBGPF

    0.0800

    63.18

    +0.13%

  • NGG

    0.1400

    87.64

    +0.16%

  • GSK

    -0.5200

    50.38

    -1.03%

  • AZN

    -2.2200

    181.24

    -1.22%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    23.29

    +0.17%

  • RELX

    -0.2000

    36.16

    -0.55%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    16.5

    +0.91%

  • BTI

    1.0500

    59.4

    +1.77%

  • BP

    -0.4400

    46.5

    -0.95%

  • VOD

    -0.3100

    15.74

    -1.97%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

(U.Gruber--BBZ)