Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.234484
AFN 75.525959
ALL 93.496795
AMD 423.119596
AOA 1058.346472
ARS 1725.074788
AUD 1.637107
AWG 2.07519
AZN 1.962632
BAM 1.957691
BBD 2.321202
BDT 142.667793
BHD 0.434694
BIF 3451.156725
BMD 1.152883
BND 1.478828
BOB 13.997155
BRL 5.933088
BSD 1.152493
BTN 109.987798
BWP 15.672137
BYN 3.396781
BYR 22596.516387
BZD 2.317939
CAD 1.62145
CDF 2605.516696
CHF 0.933282
CLF 0.026714
CLP 1054.808019
CNY 7.786056
CNH 7.779885
COP 3695.729428
CRC 522.595673
CUC 1.152883
CUP 30.551412
CVE 110.849957
CZK 24.182763
DJF 204.890551
DKK 7.475254
DOP 67.338982
DZD 153.235527
EGP 57.852662
ERN 17.293252
ETB 184.288964
FJD 2.550121
FKP 0.858174
GBP 0.857162
GEL 3.01479
GGP 0.858174
GHS 13.506006
GIP 0.858174
GMD 85.313246
GNF 10128.081128
GTQ 8.79049
GYD 241.279896
HKD 9.04172
HNL 30.966965
HRK 7.532253
HTG 150.684228
HUF 361.377671
IDR 20717.3163
ILS 3.472278
IMP 0.858174
INR 109.631553
IQD 1510.277371
IRR 1585358.908276
ISK 141.816466
JEP 0.858174
JMD 182.225999
JOD 0.817348
JPY 181.890788
KES 149.159955
KGS 100.819916
KHR 4669.178288
KMF 493.43364
KRW 1648.703679
KWD 0.356749
KYD 0.960407
KZT 542.922598
LAK 26055.16697
LBP 103240.716136
LKR 386.953731
LRD 208.989005
LSL 19.057421
LTL 3.404166
LVL 0.697367
LYD 7.338106
MAD 10.747153
MDL 20.174047
MGA 4951.634462
MKD 61.589485
MMK 2420.670883
MNT 4132.279507
MOP 9.310891
MRU 46.241692
MUR 53.615768
MVR 17.823439
MWK 2002.558271
MXN 19.905456
MYR 4.72314
MZN 73.666005
NAD 19.056776
NGN 1571.829631
NIO 42.410962
NOK 11.003869
NPR 175.98297
NZD 1.95845
OMR 0.44329
PAB 1.152513
PEN 3.913466
PGK 5.095683
PHP 70.32012
PKR 320.299843
PLN 4.29691
PYG 6871.666662
QAR 4.203125
RON 5.251268
RSD 117.365836
RUB 92.949
RWF 1692.432962
SAR 4.31666
SBD 9.305103
SCR 16.068725
SDG 692.305155
SEK 10.995131
SGD 1.478225
SLE 28.187833
SOS 658.63613
SRD 43.683906
STD 23862.360563
STN 24.902283
SVC 10.08474
SZL 19.057047
THB 38.344766
TJS 10.637436
TMT 4.035092
TND 3.390648
TRY 54.820534
TTD 7.824557
TWD 37.364032
TZS 3060.903378
UAH 51.534073
UGX 4316.093737
USD 1.152883
UYU 46.43505
UZS 13850.742055
VES 848.697257
VND 30278.755517
VUV 137.358929
WST 3.149926
XAF 656.591155
XAG 0.01936
XAU 0.000283
XCD 3.115725
XCG 2.077106
XDR 0.817519
XOF 654.286731
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.844616
ZAR 18.901156
ZMK 10377.338487
ZMW 21.807658
ZWL 371.228013
  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    20.35

    +0.74%

  • RBGPF

    3.9500

    69.95

    +5.65%

  • GSK

    0.0200

    51.53

    +0.04%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    21.79

    +0.14%

  • RIO

    3.1100

    99.01

    +3.14%

  • AZN

    -2.3500

    155.62

    -1.51%

  • NGG

    0.5600

    80.42

    +0.7%

  • RELX

    0.6400

    36.8

    +1.74%

  • BCC

    3.4600

    86.49

    +4%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    15.69

    +0.51%

  • BCE

    0.2100

    22

    +0.95%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.02

    0%

  • JRI

    -0.1000

    12.72

    -0.79%

  • BP

    -1.8200

    42.44

    -4.29%

  • BTI

    -0.4400

    59.12

    -0.74%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

(U.Gruber--BBZ)