Berliner Boersenzeitung - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.242869
AFN 76.250342
ALL 93.247528
AMD 421.964016
AOA 1060.572233
ARS 1728.626236
AUD 1.637747
AWG 2.082442
AZN 1.95442
BAM 1.95517
BBD 2.323451
BDT 142.793982
BHD 0.43505
BIF 3442.245991
BMD 1.155308
BND 1.479204
BOB 14.010485
BRL 5.937698
BSD 1.153603
BTN 109.671657
BWP 15.643552
BYN 3.4119
BYR 22644.030618
BZD 2.320142
CAD 1.618476
CDF 2612.150446
CHF 0.931709
CLF 0.026743
CLP 1055.974029
CNY 7.798053
CNH 7.795213
COP 3676.986215
CRC 523.120097
CUC 1.155308
CUP 30.615654
CVE 110.229477
CZK 24.187288
DJF 205.419355
DKK 7.475378
DOP 67.276572
DZD 153.581966
EGP 57.556847
ERN 17.329615
ETB 186.190862
FJD 2.553806
FKP 0.858651
GBP 0.857925
GEL 3.021126
GGP 0.858651
GHS 13.525641
GIP 0.858651
GMD 84.914239
GNF 10132.383874
GTQ 8.799164
GYD 241.32223
HKD 9.061864
HNL 30.919233
HRK 7.533413
HTG 150.826824
HUF 362.202869
IDR 20696.181862
ILS 3.470255
IMP 0.858651
INR 109.822567
IQD 1511.219527
IRR 1588317.004451
ISK 141.80247
JEP 0.858651
JMD 183.31537
JOD 0.819133
JPY 182.194907
KES 149.462068
KGS 101.031383
KHR 4675.351658
KMF 493.31666
KRW 1638.053175
KWD 0.357244
KYD 0.961394
KZT 541.347885
LAK 26077.708924
LBP 103304.008718
LKR 387.05831
LRD 208.222897
LSL 18.925383
LTL 3.411323
LVL 0.698834
LYD 7.342475
MAD 10.751835
MDL 20.043627
MGA 4910.290079
MKD 61.505179
MMK 2425.340128
MNT 4157.025473
MOP 9.319937
MRU 46.258492
MUR 54.264829
MVR 17.849421
MWK 2000.294776
MXN 19.917441
MYR 4.722435
MZN 73.836264
NAD 18.925383
NGN 1572.905055
NIO 42.454848
NOK 11.010256
NPR 175.469896
NZD 1.961395
OMR 0.444221
PAB 1.153628
PEN 3.905142
PGK 5.172176
PHP 70.03013
PKR 320.314956
PLN 4.300516
PYG 6879.634064
QAR 4.217541
RON 5.244867
RSD 117.359633
RUB 93.554303
RWF 1694.602551
SAR 4.335326
SBD 9.321425
SCR 15.49527
SDG 693.766315
SEK 10.9609
SGD 1.47936
SLE 28.429167
SOS 659.267569
SRD 43.518143
STD 23912.536514
STN 24.491365
SVC 10.093791
SZL 18.909415
THB 38.2141
TJS 10.647669
TMT 4.043577
TND 3.384909
TRY 54.983998
TTD 7.824327
TWD 37.250007
TZS 3061.563041
UAH 51.622323
UGX 4302.613418
USD 1.155308
UYU 46.385052
UZS 13713.580591
VES 871.346053
VND 30308.341798
VUV 138.133218
WST 3.161791
XAF 655.725817
XAG 0.018555
XAU 0.00027
XCD 3.122277
XCG 2.079039
XDR 0.815516
XOF 655.731491
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.663498
ZAR 18.861902
ZMK 10399.156062
ZMW 22.021903
ZWL 372.008603
  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    21.73

    -0.28%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    22.04

    +0.09%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    80.26

    -0.2%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    59.27

    +0.25%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.74

    0%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    22.06

    +0.27%

  • RIO

    2.5000

    101.51

    +2.46%

  • AZN

    5.8800

    161.5

    +3.64%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    36.61

    -0.52%

  • GSK

    -0.0700

    51.46

    -0.14%

  • RYCEF

    0.6000

    21

    +2.86%

  • BCC

    -1.6900

    84.8

    -1.99%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.67

    -0.39%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    15.31

    -2.48%

  • BP

    -1.2300

    41.21

    -2.98%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

(T.Renner--BBZ)