Berliner Boersenzeitung - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.198746
AFN 72.027437
ALL 95.86206
AMD 431.78058
ANG 2.046593
AOA 1048.401651
ARS 1598.59809
AUD 1.629093
AWG 2.057931
AZN 1.946836
BAM 1.95299
BBD 2.306581
BDT 140.527788
BGN 1.954244
BHD 0.431609
BIF 3399.807863
BMD 1.143295
BND 1.465491
BOB 7.913613
BRL 6.101876
BSD 1.145252
BTN 105.710351
BWP 15.605613
BYN 3.388624
BYR 22408.579285
BZD 2.303186
CAD 1.56796
CDF 2580.416172
CHF 0.903826
CLF 0.026658
CLP 1052.620475
CNY 7.88485
CNH 7.890221
COP 4222.828168
CRC 538.827014
CUC 1.143295
CUP 30.297314
CVE 110.107044
CZK 24.460822
DJF 203.936547
DKK 7.471981
DOP 70.359065
DZD 151.640297
EGP 60.04596
ERN 17.149423
ETB 178.761853
FJD 2.540687
FKP 0.859503
GBP 0.862776
GEL 3.121081
GGP 0.859503
GHS 12.437104
GIP 0.859503
GMD 84.033056
GNF 10040.342872
GTQ 8.782401
GYD 239.595236
HKD 8.950958
HNL 30.314512
HRK 7.532942
HTG 150.159332
HUF 392.479443
IDR 19439.442529
ILS 3.586748
IMP 0.859503
INR 105.697035
IQD 1500.247787
IRR 1511121.400458
ISK 144.203925
JEP 0.859503
JMD 179.692219
JOD 0.810553
JPY 182.180041
KES 147.824753
KGS 99.98079
KHR 4592.371745
KMF 492.759942
KPW 1028.965312
KRW 1711.272575
KWD 0.351266
KYD 0.954331
KZT 560.655699
LAK 24539.688735
LBP 102552.832105
LKR 356.415579
LRD 209.569358
LSL 19.234523
LTL 3.375853
LVL 0.691568
LYD 7.307485
MAD 10.786179
MDL 19.978252
MGA 4755.178355
MKD 61.63634
MMK 2400.245131
MNT 4080.393301
MOP 9.232056
MRU 45.820067
MUR 53.436996
MVR 17.664024
MWK 1985.751297
MXN 20.413988
MYR 4.497148
MZN 73.068037
NAD 19.234607
NGN 1586.767474
NIO 42.139548
NOK 11.144552
NPR 169.136362
NZD 1.968262
OMR 0.439598
PAB 1.145152
PEN 3.949317
PGK 5.007794
PHP 68.540962
PKR 319.76907
PLN 4.270784
PYG 7388.368543
QAR 4.163028
RON 5.095547
RSD 117.422553
RUB 92.41403
RWF 1671.20254
SAR 4.29147
SBD 9.205487
SCR 17.02737
SDG 687.120342
SEK 10.786004
SGD 1.465069
SHP 0.857767
SLE 28.067799
SLL 23974.333974
SOS 653.362704
SRD 42.92844
STD 23663.895329
STN 24.464797
SVC 10.020625
SYP 126.362642
SZL 19.228331
THB 37.133099
TJS 10.976853
TMT 4.001532
TND 3.386841
TOP 2.752779
TRY 50.513259
TTD 7.766858
TWD 36.691537
TZS 2978.283153
UAH 50.502451
UGX 4305.804184
USD 1.143295
UYU 46.004004
UZS 13828.041733
VES 506.141923
VND 30040.072485
VUV 135.198356
WST 3.127157
XAF 655.017331
XAG 0.014233
XAU 0.000228
XCD 3.089812
XCG 2.063939
XDR 0.814631
XOF 655.01447
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.732354
ZAR 19.25994
ZMK 10291.026055
ZMW 22.290925
ZWL 368.140479
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    22.99

    -0.48%

  • BCE

    -0.1100

    25.57

    -0.43%

  • RYCEF

    -1.1300

    16.12

    -7.01%

  • GSK

    -0.8900

    53.39

    -1.67%

  • BTI

    0.0400

    59.93

    +0.07%

  • CMSC

    -0.1500

    22.99

    -0.65%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    34.14

    -0.12%

  • AZN

    -2.6000

    189.9

    -1.37%

  • NGG

    0.0900

    90.9

    +0.1%

  • JRI

    -0.2300

    12.59

    -1.83%

  • BCC

    0.3800

    70

    +0.54%

  • VOD

    0.1000

    14.41

    +0.69%

  • RIO

    -2.8700

    87.83

    -3.27%

  • BP

    0.5100

    42.67

    +1.2%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

(T.Renner--BBZ)