Berliner Boersenzeitung - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.302842
AFN 79.988996
ALL 97.295357
AMD 449.496115
ANG 2.096669
AOA 1074.270892
ARS 1542.554451
AUD 1.787174
AWG 2.108711
AZN 1.994775
BAM 1.956754
BBD 2.366783
BDT 142.429437
BGN 1.955484
BHD 0.441666
BIF 3495.634019
BMD 1.171506
BND 1.500387
BOB 8.100018
BRL 6.312102
BSD 1.172236
BTN 102.507849
BWP 15.644293
BYN 3.875974
BYR 22961.520127
BZD 2.354668
CAD 1.611565
CDF 3385.653172
CHF 0.941185
CLF 0.0285
CLP 1117.956903
CNY 8.410473
CNH 8.409516
COP 4709.185192
CRC 592.871322
CUC 1.171506
CUP 31.044912
CVE 110.318782
CZK 24.471603
DJF 208.737308
DKK 7.462652
DOP 71.624918
DZD 152.035978
EGP 56.618843
ERN 17.572592
ETB 164.179842
FJD 2.632081
FKP 0.867307
GBP 0.863031
GEL 3.157207
GGP 0.867307
GHS 12.349384
GIP 0.867307
GMD 84.934193
GNF 10164.890962
GTQ 8.991115
GYD 245.241139
HKD 9.196329
HNL 30.729982
HRK 7.533136
HTG 153.440218
HUF 395.465457
IDR 18898.206549
ILS 3.971312
IMP 0.867307
INR 102.419433
IQD 1535.648952
IRR 49349.695449
ISK 142.958836
JEP 0.867307
JMD 187.861586
JOD 0.830587
JPY 172.542059
KES 151.452048
KGS 102.331051
KHR 4694.359167
KMF 493.789581
KPW 1054.282337
KRW 1614.603432
KWD 0.357849
KYD 0.976856
KZT 630.82289
LAK 25378.277118
LBP 104933.967605
LKR 352.691963
LRD 235.02254
LSL 20.737801
LTL 3.459153
LVL 0.708632
LYD 6.369105
MAD 10.559348
MDL 19.570124
MGA 5169.590424
MKD 61.749588
MMK 2459.266979
MNT 4213.193023
MOP 9.477735
MRU 46.783808
MUR 53.221526
MVR 18.037925
MWK 2032.686411
MXN 21.718247
MYR 4.92911
MZN 74.929531
NAD 20.737801
NGN 1798.226279
NIO 43.141033
NOK 11.944706
NPR 164.01236
NZD 1.957077
OMR 0.450427
PAB 1.171506
PEN 4.131513
PGK 4.948413
PHP 66.326585
PKR 332.664687
PLN 4.257455
PYG 8780.244627
QAR 4.274785
RON 5.060089
RSD 117.120174
RUB 93.365816
RWF 1696.194288
SAR 4.395499
SBD 9.642189
SCR 17.272426
SDG 703.489128
SEK 11.157735
SGD 1.499264
SHP 0.92062
SLE 27.177033
SLL 24565.896027
SOS 669.937247
SRD 43.836005
STD 24247.811607
STN 24.511218
SVC 10.257
SYP 15231.864138
SZL 20.733078
THB 37.824714
TJS 10.930509
TMT 4.111987
TND 3.446781
TOP 2.820706
TRY 47.73078
TTD 7.960643
TWD 35.089538
TZS 3045.915955
UAH 48.670728
UGX 4170.895348
USD 1.171506
UYU 46.942886
UZS 14664.110781
VES 155.520411
VND 30795.967364
VUV 140.053656
WST 3.11401
XAF 655.699054
XAG 0.030383
XAU 0.000349
XCD 3.166054
XCG 2.112648
XDR 0.822792
XOF 655.699054
XPF 119.331742
YER 281.483577
ZAR 20.514185
ZMK 10544.963998
ZMW 26.990389
ZWL 377.224496
  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    73.08

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.6400

    14.94

    +4.28%

  • CMSC

    0.0200

    23.08

    +0.09%

  • SCS

    0.2300

    16.19

    +1.42%

  • RIO

    0.9600

    63.1

    +1.52%

  • CMSD

    -0.0107

    23.56

    -0.05%

  • VOD

    0.0300

    11.54

    +0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.9500

    70.28

    -1.35%

  • BCC

    3.5200

    84.26

    +4.18%

  • RELX

    -0.2100

    47.83

    -0.44%

  • GSK

    0.5100

    38.22

    +1.33%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.38

    -0.07%

  • AZN

    1.2700

    75.34

    +1.69%

  • BTI

    -0.4100

    57.92

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    24.5

    +0.61%

  • BP

    0.1200

    34.07

    +0.35%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

(T.Renner--BBZ)