Berliner Boersenzeitung - Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles

EUR -
AED 4.223946
AFN 80.510557
ALL 97.475637
AMD 441.980718
ANG 2.058339
AOA 1053.539263
ARS 1337.023547
AUD 1.769193
AWG 2.070275
AZN 1.957965
BAM 1.943746
BBD 2.321404
BDT 140.608054
BGN 1.955609
BHD 0.433694
BIF 3382.598845
BMD 1.150153
BND 1.472767
BOB 7.973554
BRL 6.317905
BSD 1.149671
BTN 99.103435
BWP 15.370683
BYN 3.762567
BYR 22542.99128
BZD 2.309379
CAD 1.571241
CDF 3308.989332
CHF 0.939327
CLF 0.028339
CLP 1087.492391
CNY 8.263852
CNH 8.268223
COP 4714.475574
CRC 579.009418
CUC 1.150153
CUP 30.479044
CVE 109.695833
CZK 24.821099
DJF 204.405049
DKK 7.458027
DOP 68.261176
DZD 149.432603
EGP 57.695794
ERN 17.252289
ETB 155.045825
FJD 2.584106
FKP 0.845842
GBP 0.854914
GEL 3.12891
GGP 0.845842
GHS 11.857814
GIP 0.845842
GMD 82.249919
GNF 9955.721011
GTQ 8.830241
GYD 240.448916
HKD 9.028549
HNL 30.076594
HRK 7.533155
HTG 150.466917
HUF 403.979802
IDR 18775.091309
ILS 4.027018
IMP 0.845842
INR 99.247363
IQD 1506.699927
IRR 48450.179156
ISK 143.608181
JEP 0.845842
JMD 182.985263
JOD 0.815427
JPY 166.791625
KES 148.657242
KGS 100.581106
KHR 4623.613675
KMF 493.415223
KPW 1035.143263
KRW 1577.917796
KWD 0.352269
KYD 0.958158
KZT 596.500949
LAK 24814.542832
LBP 103027.107435
LKR 345.775758
LRD 229.627677
LSL 20.725326
LTL 3.396101
LVL 0.695716
LYD 6.23955
MAD 10.49511
MDL 19.637225
MGA 5089.425218
MKD 61.515245
MMK 2414.1161
MNT 4120.384358
MOP 9.295975
MRU 45.684601
MUR 52.55024
MVR 17.718132
MWK 1996.665142
MXN 21.83199
MYR 4.884123
MZN 73.552204
NAD 20.725961
NGN 1775.262756
NIO 42.268841
NOK 11.41293
NPR 158.565695
NZD 1.906688
OMR 0.44223
PAB 1.149671
PEN 4.154923
PGK 4.740066
PHP 65.496622
PKR 325.809472
PLN 4.275037
PYG 9184.047428
QAR 4.187134
RON 5.031459
RSD 117.214365
RUB 90.284688
RWF 1638.967478
SAR 4.315241
SBD 9.608794
SCR 16.793419
SDG 690.657152
SEK 10.96326
SGD 1.477273
SHP 0.903839
SLE 25.849656
SLL 24118.129503
SOS 657.313641
SRD 44.683033
STD 23805.837009
SVC 10.059618
SYP 14954.165597
SZL 20.725504
THB 37.489798
TJS 11.387881
TMT 4.025534
TND 3.384323
TOP 2.69377
TRY 45.470703
TTD 7.805596
TWD 33.962284
TZS 2996.147591
UAH 47.770976
UGX 4133.367953
USD 1.150153
UYU 47.237479
UZS 14618.44012
VES 117.349266
VND 30004.606379
VUV 137.919735
WST 3.164966
XAF 651.914316
XAG 0.030851
XAU 0.00034
XCD 3.108345
XDR 0.813457
XOF 652.71576
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.140307
ZAR 20.670934
ZMK 10352.754768
ZMW 27.989431
ZWL 370.348673
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles
Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles / Photo: Etienne BALMER - AFP

Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles

Japan wants to become a hydrogen fuel leader to meet its net-zero goals, but one blockbuster project is hanging in the balance over questions about its climate credentials.

Text size:

The Hydrogen Energy Supply Chain (HESC) is billed as a billion-dollar attempt to ship liquid hydrogen from Australia to Japan.

However, cold feet about the project in Australia means HESC will source hydrogen from Japan to meet a 2030 deadline for its demonstration phase.

Hydrogen sounds promising on paper: while fossil fuels emit planet-warming greenhouse gases, burning hydrogen creates only water vapour.

But it has not yet lived up to its promise, with several much-hyped projects globally struggling to overcome high costs and engineering challenges.

Hydrogen's climate credentials also depend on how it is produced.

"Green hydrogen" uses renewable energy, while "blue hydrogen" relies on fossil fuels such as coal and gas, with carbon-capture technology to reduce emissions.

"Brown hydrogen" is produced by fossil fuels without any carbon capture.

The HESC project aims to produce blue hydrogen in the Australian state of Victoria, harnessing abundant local supplies of lignite coal.

With the world's first liquid hydrogen tanker and an imposing storage site near Kobe in Japan, HESC had been touted as a flagship experiment showcasing Japan's ambitions for the fuel.

HESC says it aims to eventually produce enough hydrogen to "reduce about 1.8 million tonnes per annum of CO2 from being released into the atmosphere".

Japan's energy sector emitted 974 million tonnes of CO2 from fuel combustion in 2022, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

- 'Strong opposition' -

Japan's government pledged 220 billion yen (now $1.4 billion) to HESC's current "commercial demonstration" phase, which has a completion deadline of 2030.

But to meet this deadline, the project will now source hydrogen in Japan.

That has been blamed on cold feet among Australian officials concerned about the project's environmental payoff.

A spokesman for Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries, one of the companies behind HESC, said the decision to shift production to Japan was taken "chiefly because of delay in procedures on the Australian side".

The Victoria government did not respond to repeated requests for comment, though Australian officials have told local media that the move was a Japanese "commercial decision".

Australia's cooling interest in the project is due to "strong opposition" from environmental activists and energy experts opposed to carbon capture and storage, said Daisuke Akimoto of Tokyo University of Information Sciences.

"The main problem the project faces is the lack of approval of the blue hydrogen project by the Victorian government," Akimoto said.

Kawasaki said it has not yet decided what type of hydrogen it will procure in Japan and downplayed the project's challenges.

"We are very positive" about HESC and "there is no change" to the goal of building a new supply chain, the spokesman said, declining to be named.

- 'Evidence gap' -

However, sourcing the hydrogen locally leaves "a critical evidence gap at the middle of the project" -- proving carbon capture and storage work -- explained David Cebon, an engineering professor at the University of Cambridge.

That is "difficult and challenging and not being done successfully anywhere", Cebon said.

Kawasaki has said it will continue "feasibility studies" for the HESC project, but Cebon believes it will "quietly die", partly because of the cost of shipping hydrogen to Japan.

To be transported by sea as a liquid, hydrogen needs to be cooled to -253 degrees Celsius (-423.4 Fahrenheit) -- an expensive, energy-intensive process.

"I think wiser heads in the government just realised how crazy it is," said Mark Ogge from the Australia Institute think-tank.

Japanese energy company Kansai Electric has separately withdrawn from a different project to produce "green" hydrogen in Australia.

A company spokesman declined to comment on reports that the decision was due to ballooning costs.

- 'It will take decades' -

Resource-poor Japan is the world's fifth largest single-country emitter of carbon dioxide.

It already produces some hydrogen domestically, mostly using natural gas and oil or nuclear power, although this is limited and expensive.

Some experts are sanguine about HESC's challenges.

Noe van Hulst, a hydrogen advisor to the IEA, said it was important to take the long view.

"Pilot projects are undertaken to test innovations in practice: learning-by-doing," he told AFP.

"Yes, it is hard to develop a low-carbon hydrogen market and it will take decades," as with wind and solar energy, van Hulst said.

Solar in particular has seen costs plummet and uptake soar far beyond initial expectations and at greater speed.

And for now, "there isn't really an alternative (to) decarbonise these hard-to-electrify sectors like steel, cement, ships and planes", van Hulst added.

(H.Schneide--BBZ)