Berliner Boersenzeitung - Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles

EUR -
AED 4.202809
AFN 72.097162
ALL 95.786655
AMD 431.439057
ANG 2.048573
AOA 1049.415759
ARS 1600.159384
AUD 1.631526
AWG 2.059922
AZN 1.946316
BAM 1.951454
BBD 2.304767
BDT 140.417249
BGN 1.956135
BHD 0.434931
BIF 3397.133571
BMD 1.144401
BND 1.464338
BOB 7.907388
BRL 6.100344
BSD 1.144351
BTN 105.626738
BWP 15.593269
BYN 3.385958
BYR 22430.261126
BZD 2.301374
CAD 1.568877
CDF 2582.913266
CHF 0.903665
CLF 0.026583
CLP 1049.655944
CNY 7.892473
CNH 7.896257
COP 4213.914357
CRC 538.400821
CUC 1.144401
CUP 30.326629
CVE 110.019953
CZK 24.464976
DJF 203.77613
DKK 7.471852
DOP 70.303413
DZD 152.804659
EGP 59.88872
ERN 17.166016
ETB 178.620459
FJD 2.550527
FKP 0.860334
GBP 0.863347
GEL 3.124469
GGP 0.860334
GHS 12.427321
GIP 0.860334
GMD 84.117996
GNF 10031.656512
GTQ 8.775454
GYD 239.40677
HKD 8.958085
HNL 30.290534
HRK 7.538742
HTG 150.045803
HUF 393.085178
IDR 19409.0995
ILS 3.598386
IMP 0.860334
INR 105.954202
IQD 1499.061144
IRR 1512583.514184
ISK 144.53934
JEP 0.860334
JMD 179.550088
JOD 0.811364
JPY 182.495918
KES 148.010337
KGS 100.077533
KHR 4588.779421
KMF 493.237021
KPW 1029.960907
KRW 1719.748978
KWD 0.351823
KYD 0.953576
KZT 560.21224
LAK 24520.385795
LBP 102472.163961
LKR 356.136777
LRD 209.403596
LSL 19.219393
LTL 3.379118
LVL 0.692237
LYD 7.301737
MAD 10.777695
MDL 19.962537
MGA 4751.417178
MKD 61.503014
MMK 2402.567533
MNT 4084.341362
MOP 9.224754
MRU 45.784025
MUR 53.226009
MVR 17.680917
MWK 1984.180639
MXN 20.448216
MYR 4.507221
MZN 73.138831
NAD 19.219393
NGN 1585.566919
NIO 42.106217
NOK 11.172719
NPR 169.002581
NZD 1.97261
OMR 0.440025
PAB 1.144251
PEN 3.946211
PGK 5.003855
PHP 68.194646
PKR 319.517539
PLN 4.27653
PYG 7382.556846
QAR 4.159735
RON 5.107007
RSD 117.109163
RUB 91.651288
RWF 1669.880678
SAR 4.294863
SBD 9.214394
SCR 17.472084
SDG 687.784516
SEK 10.806413
SGD 1.466619
SHP 0.858597
SLE 28.094957
SLL 23997.530791
SOS 652.845918
SRD 42.969965
STD 23686.791775
STN 24.445552
SVC 10.012699
SYP 126.484907
SZL 19.213206
THB 36.996194
TJS 10.968171
TMT 4.005404
TND 3.384162
TOP 2.755443
TRY 50.576857
TTD 7.760715
TWD 36.843533
TZS 2980.860735
UAH 50.462505
UGX 4302.417235
USD 1.144401
UYU 45.967616
UZS 13817.224924
VES 506.63165
VND 30090.881941
VUV 135.32917
WST 3.130183
XAF 654.499235
XAG 0.014083
XAU 0.000228
XCD 3.092801
XCG 2.062307
XDR 0.813987
XOF 654.499235
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.99679
ZAR 19.305382
ZMK 10300.948139
ZMW 22.273391
ZWL 368.49668
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • JRI

    -0.2300

    12.59

    -1.83%

  • AZN

    -2.6000

    189.9

    -1.37%

  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    22.99

    -0.48%

  • BCC

    0.3800

    70

    +0.54%

  • BCE

    -0.1100

    25.57

    -0.43%

  • GSK

    -0.8900

    53.39

    -1.67%

  • NGG

    0.0900

    90.9

    +0.1%

  • CMSC

    -0.1500

    22.99

    -0.65%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    34.14

    -0.12%

  • VOD

    0.1000

    14.41

    +0.69%

  • RYCEF

    -1.1300

    16.12

    -7.01%

  • RIO

    -2.8700

    87.83

    -3.27%

  • BTI

    0.0400

    59.93

    +0.07%

  • BP

    0.5100

    42.67

    +1.2%

Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles
Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles / Photo: Etienne BALMER - AFP

Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles

Japan wants to become a hydrogen fuel leader to meet its net-zero goals, but one blockbuster project is hanging in the balance over questions about its climate credentials.

Text size:

The Hydrogen Energy Supply Chain (HESC) is billed as a billion-dollar attempt to ship liquid hydrogen from Australia to Japan.

However, cold feet about the project in Australia means HESC will source hydrogen from Japan to meet a 2030 deadline for its demonstration phase.

Hydrogen sounds promising on paper: while fossil fuels emit planet-warming greenhouse gases, burning hydrogen creates only water vapour.

But it has not yet lived up to its promise, with several much-hyped projects globally struggling to overcome high costs and engineering challenges.

Hydrogen's climate credentials also depend on how it is produced.

"Green hydrogen" uses renewable energy, while "blue hydrogen" relies on fossil fuels such as coal and gas, with carbon-capture technology to reduce emissions.

"Brown hydrogen" is produced by fossil fuels without any carbon capture.

The HESC project aims to produce blue hydrogen in the Australian state of Victoria, harnessing abundant local supplies of lignite coal.

With the world's first liquid hydrogen tanker and an imposing storage site near Kobe in Japan, HESC had been touted as a flagship experiment showcasing Japan's ambitions for the fuel.

HESC says it aims to eventually produce enough hydrogen to "reduce about 1.8 million tonnes per annum of CO2 from being released into the atmosphere".

Japan's energy sector emitted 974 million tonnes of CO2 from fuel combustion in 2022, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

- 'Strong opposition' -

Japan's government pledged 220 billion yen (now $1.4 billion) to HESC's current "commercial demonstration" phase, which has a completion deadline of 2030.

But to meet this deadline, the project will now source hydrogen in Japan.

That has been blamed on cold feet among Australian officials concerned about the project's environmental payoff.

A spokesman for Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries, one of the companies behind HESC, said the decision to shift production to Japan was taken "chiefly because of delay in procedures on the Australian side".

The Victoria government did not respond to repeated requests for comment, though Australian officials have told local media that the move was a Japanese "commercial decision".

Australia's cooling interest in the project is due to "strong opposition" from environmental activists and energy experts opposed to carbon capture and storage, said Daisuke Akimoto of Tokyo University of Information Sciences.

"The main problem the project faces is the lack of approval of the blue hydrogen project by the Victorian government," Akimoto said.

Kawasaki said it has not yet decided what type of hydrogen it will procure in Japan and downplayed the project's challenges.

"We are very positive" about HESC and "there is no change" to the goal of building a new supply chain, the spokesman said, declining to be named.

- 'Evidence gap' -

However, sourcing the hydrogen locally leaves "a critical evidence gap at the middle of the project" -- proving carbon capture and storage work -- explained David Cebon, an engineering professor at the University of Cambridge.

That is "difficult and challenging and not being done successfully anywhere", Cebon said.

Kawasaki has said it will continue "feasibility studies" for the HESC project, but Cebon believes it will "quietly die", partly because of the cost of shipping hydrogen to Japan.

To be transported by sea as a liquid, hydrogen needs to be cooled to -253 degrees Celsius (-423.4 Fahrenheit) -- an expensive, energy-intensive process.

"I think wiser heads in the government just realised how crazy it is," said Mark Ogge from the Australia Institute think-tank.

Japanese energy company Kansai Electric has separately withdrawn from a different project to produce "green" hydrogen in Australia.

A company spokesman declined to comment on reports that the decision was due to ballooning costs.

- 'It will take decades' -

Resource-poor Japan is the world's fifth largest single-country emitter of carbon dioxide.

It already produces some hydrogen domestically, mostly using natural gas and oil or nuclear power, although this is limited and expensive.

Some experts are sanguine about HESC's challenges.

Noe van Hulst, a hydrogen advisor to the IEA, said it was important to take the long view.

"Pilot projects are undertaken to test innovations in practice: learning-by-doing," he told AFP.

"Yes, it is hard to develop a low-carbon hydrogen market and it will take decades," as with wind and solar energy, van Hulst said.

Solar in particular has seen costs plummet and uptake soar far beyond initial expectations and at greater speed.

And for now, "there isn't really an alternative (to) decarbonise these hard-to-electrify sectors like steel, cement, ships and planes", van Hulst added.

(H.Schneide--BBZ)