Berliner Boersenzeitung - Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles

EUR -
AED 4.098593
AFN 71.425776
ALL 90.641933
AMD 401.92437
ANG 1.997438
AOA 1024.507986
ARS 1713.276213
AUD 1.587859
AWG 2.011628
AZN 1.901667
BAM 1.949792
BBD 2.248044
BDT 138.563061
BGN 1.950617
BHD 0.421417
BIF 3349.5993
BMD 1.116021
BND 1.425951
BOB 13.533664
BRL 6.070937
BSD 1.116196
BTN 105.924423
BWP 15.421038
BYN 3.287873
BYR 21874.017971
BZD 2.244764
CAD 1.559696
CDF 2583.589771
CHF 0.919829
CLF 0.028064
CLP 1108.120336
CNY 7.433934
CNH 7.424962
COP 3592.930214
CRC 507.552053
CUC 1.116021
CUP 26.786466
CVE 109.925805
CZK 24.347166
DJF 198.339749
DKK 7.474892
DOP 67.65397
DZD 151.559089
EGP 62.483993
ERN 16.74032
ETB 180.194744
FJD 2.504022
FKP 0.83439
GBP 0.833349
GEL 2.905964
GGP 0.83439
GHS 13.003284
GIP 0.83439
GMD 82.585975
GNF 9878.562262
GTQ 8.532709
GYD 233.955428
HKD 8.756583
HNL 29.999566
HRK 7.55436
HTG 146.234664
HUF 365.988466
IDR 20237.651703
ILS 3.509396
IMP 0.83439
INR 105.929959
IQD 1691.986666
IRR 2085190.984464
ISK 135.965309
JEP 0.83439
JMD 177.362717
JOD 0.791303
JPY 175.935226
KES 144.938119
KGS 97.594619
KHR 4554.029374
KMF 492.165795
KPW 1004.419149
KRW 1488.125583
KWD 0.347273
KYD 0.93013
KZT 506.070699
LAK 25130.46894
LBP 99950.420445
LKR 371.24612
LRD 189.732847
LSL 18.600389
LTL 3.295321
LVL 0.675071
LYD 7.174861
MAD 10.974337
MDL 19.979156
MGA 5048.625172
MKD 61.390843
MMK 2343.543963
MNT 4015.314413
MOP 9.01889
MRU 45.260167
MUR 52.765911
MVR 17.242952
MWK 1934.989941
MXN 20.966362
MYR 4.529042
MZN 71.325344
NAD 18.600389
NGN 1502.689654
NIO 41.073445
NOK 10.276887
NPR 169.478878
NZD 1.981924
OMR 0.428888
PAB 1.1163
PEN 3.863097
PGK 5.079327
PHP 71.162546
PKR 308.772114
PLN 4.405216
PYG 6538.852546
QAR 4.068664
RON 5.337042
RSD 117.488072
RUB 90.019153
RWF 1647.601281
SAR 4.18999
SBD 8.99313
SCR 15.350293
SDG 671.290929
SEK 10.966253
SGD 1.426614
SHP 0.835158
SLE 25.56098
SLL 23402.414084
SOS 637.843256
SRD 41.984169
STD 23099.388191
STN 24.425506
SVC 9.765909
SYP 14510.508917
SZL 18.595371
THB 37.677292
TJS 10.273707
TMT 3.906075
TND 3.337716
TOP 2.687111
TRY 55.728194
TTD 7.567683
TWD 36.406294
TZS 2947.633334
UAH 50.62483
UGX 4743.533032
USD 1.116021
UYU 44.873345
UZS 13387.231203
VES 990.446387
VND 28797.256261
VUV 133.049232
WST 3.095733
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.022721
XAU 0.000287966488
XCD 3.016104
XCG 2.011502
XDR 0.789085
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.608242
ZAR 18.668185
ZMK 10045.535151
ZMW 22.507256
ZWL 359.358411
SSP 6411.76467
MXV 2.363023
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles
Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles / Photo: Etienne BALMER - AFP

Japan-Australia flagship hydrogen project stumbles

Japan wants to become a hydrogen fuel leader to meet its net-zero goals, but one blockbuster project is hanging in the balance over questions about its climate credentials.

Text size:

The Hydrogen Energy Supply Chain (HESC) is billed as a billion-dollar attempt to ship liquid hydrogen from Australia to Japan.

However, cold feet about the project in Australia means HESC will source hydrogen from Japan to meet a 2030 deadline for its demonstration phase.

Hydrogen sounds promising on paper: while fossil fuels emit planet-warming greenhouse gases, burning hydrogen creates only water vapour.

But it has not yet lived up to its promise, with several much-hyped projects globally struggling to overcome high costs and engineering challenges.

Hydrogen's climate credentials also depend on how it is produced.

"Green hydrogen" uses renewable energy, while "blue hydrogen" relies on fossil fuels such as coal and gas, with carbon-capture technology to reduce emissions.

"Brown hydrogen" is produced by fossil fuels without any carbon capture.

The HESC project aims to produce blue hydrogen in the Australian state of Victoria, harnessing abundant local supplies of lignite coal.

With the world's first liquid hydrogen tanker and an imposing storage site near Kobe in Japan, HESC had been touted as a flagship experiment showcasing Japan's ambitions for the fuel.

HESC says it aims to eventually produce enough hydrogen to "reduce about 1.8 million tonnes per annum of CO2 from being released into the atmosphere".

Japan's energy sector emitted 974 million tonnes of CO2 from fuel combustion in 2022, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

- 'Strong opposition' -

Japan's government pledged 220 billion yen (now $1.4 billion) to HESC's current "commercial demonstration" phase, which has a completion deadline of 2030.

But to meet this deadline, the project will now source hydrogen in Japan.

That has been blamed on cold feet among Australian officials concerned about the project's environmental payoff.

A spokesman for Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries, one of the companies behind HESC, said the decision to shift production to Japan was taken "chiefly because of delay in procedures on the Australian side".

The Victoria government did not respond to repeated requests for comment, though Australian officials have told local media that the move was a Japanese "commercial decision".

Australia's cooling interest in the project is due to "strong opposition" from environmental activists and energy experts opposed to carbon capture and storage, said Daisuke Akimoto of Tokyo University of Information Sciences.

"The main problem the project faces is the lack of approval of the blue hydrogen project by the Victorian government," Akimoto said.

Kawasaki said it has not yet decided what type of hydrogen it will procure in Japan and downplayed the project's challenges.

"We are very positive" about HESC and "there is no change" to the goal of building a new supply chain, the spokesman said, declining to be named.

- 'Evidence gap' -

However, sourcing the hydrogen locally leaves "a critical evidence gap at the middle of the project" -- proving carbon capture and storage work -- explained David Cebon, an engineering professor at the University of Cambridge.

That is "difficult and challenging and not being done successfully anywhere", Cebon said.

Kawasaki has said it will continue "feasibility studies" for the HESC project, but Cebon believes it will "quietly die", partly because of the cost of shipping hydrogen to Japan.

To be transported by sea as a liquid, hydrogen needs to be cooled to -253 degrees Celsius (-423.4 Fahrenheit) -- an expensive, energy-intensive process.

"I think wiser heads in the government just realised how crazy it is," said Mark Ogge from the Australia Institute think-tank.

Japanese energy company Kansai Electric has separately withdrawn from a different project to produce "green" hydrogen in Australia.

A company spokesman declined to comment on reports that the decision was due to ballooning costs.

- 'It will take decades' -

Resource-poor Japan is the world's fifth largest single-country emitter of carbon dioxide.

It already produces some hydrogen domestically, mostly using natural gas and oil or nuclear power, although this is limited and expensive.

Some experts are sanguine about HESC's challenges.

Noe van Hulst, a hydrogen advisor to the IEA, said it was important to take the long view.

"Pilot projects are undertaken to test innovations in practice: learning-by-doing," he told AFP.

"Yes, it is hard to develop a low-carbon hydrogen market and it will take decades," as with wind and solar energy, van Hulst said.

Solar in particular has seen costs plummet and uptake soar far beyond initial expectations and at greater speed.

And for now, "there isn't really an alternative (to) decarbonise these hard-to-electrify sectors like steel, cement, ships and planes", van Hulst added.

(H.Schneide--BBZ)