Berliner Boersenzeitung - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.211393
AFN 72.244796
ALL 95.982096
AMD 432.319357
ANG 2.052753
AOA 1051.557417
ARS 1603.424201
AUD 1.641243
AWG 2.064125
AZN 1.954004
BAM 1.955435
BBD 2.309469
BDT 140.703754
BGN 1.960126
BHD 0.435819
BIF 3404.065016
BMD 1.146736
BND 1.467326
BOB 7.923522
BRL 6.112796
BSD 1.146686
BTN 105.842257
BWP 15.625085
BYN 3.392867
BYR 22476.027392
BZD 2.30607
CAD 1.583471
CDF 2588.183773
CHF 0.912745
CLF 0.026638
CLP 1051.798264
CNY 7.908585
CNH 7.921286
COP 4222.512346
CRC 539.499363
CUC 1.146736
CUP 30.388506
CVE 110.244435
CZK 24.575006
DJF 204.191911
DKK 7.505507
DOP 70.446859
DZD 153.116438
EGP 59.873831
ERN 17.201041
ETB 178.984913
FJD 2.555735
FKP 0.866182
GBP 0.866311
GEL 3.131037
GGP 0.866182
GHS 12.452677
GIP 0.866182
GMD 84.289519
GNF 10052.124908
GTQ 8.79336
GYD 239.895251
HKD 8.97946
HNL 30.352338
HRK 7.568004
HTG 150.351954
HUF 394.179508
IDR 19448.701448
ILS 3.605729
IMP 0.866182
INR 106.170389
IQD 1502.119799
IRR 1515669.760861
ISK 144.837141
JEP 0.866182
JMD 179.916439
JOD 0.813081
JPY 183.185402
KES 148.312334
KGS 100.281732
KHR 4598.142277
KMF 494.243657
KPW 1032.019272
KRW 1723.258101
KWD 0.352542
KYD 0.955522
KZT 561.355287
LAK 24570.416711
LBP 102681.246162
LKR 356.863432
LRD 209.830859
LSL 19.258608
LTL 3.386014
LVL 0.69365
LYD 7.316635
MAD 10.799685
MDL 20.003269
MGA 4761.111877
MKD 61.628504
MMK 2408.293814
MNT 4109.908675
MOP 9.243576
MRU 45.877442
MUR 53.33513
MVR 17.717506
MWK 1988.229122
MXN 20.584147
MYR 4.516425
MZN 73.288336
NAD 19.258608
NGN 1588.807126
NIO 42.19213
NOK 11.176343
NPR 169.34741
NZD 1.985003
OMR 0.440925
PAB 1.146586
PEN 3.954262
PGK 5.014065
PHP 68.334433
PKR 320.169477
PLN 4.298483
PYG 7397.620071
QAR 4.168222
RON 5.117429
RSD 117.34811
RUB 91.632507
RWF 1673.28787
SAR 4.303626
SBD 9.233195
SCR 17.507734
SDG 689.18878
SEK 10.871865
SGD 1.469547
SHP 0.860349
SLE 28.152796
SLL 24046.494883
SOS 654.177972
SRD 43.05769
STD 23735.121842
STN 24.495431
SVC 10.033128
SYP 126.777699
SZL 19.252409
THB 37.071728
TJS 10.99055
TMT 4.013576
TND 3.391067
TOP 2.761065
TRY 50.645643
TTD 7.776549
TWD 36.918714
TZS 2986.942825
UAH 50.565468
UGX 4311.195803
USD 1.146736
UYU 46.061408
UZS 13845.417319
VES 507.665371
VND 30152.278788
VUV 137.132233
WST 3.13652
XAF 655.834663
XAG 0.014239
XAU 0.000228
XCD 3.099112
XCG 2.066515
XDR 0.815648
XOF 655.834663
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.554311
ZAR 19.360243
ZMK 10322.005017
ZMW 22.318837
ZWL 369.248554
  • BCE

    -0.1100

    25.57

    -0.43%

  • JRI

    -0.2300

    12.59

    -1.83%

  • CMSD

    -0.1100

    22.99

    -0.48%

  • BCC

    0.3800

    70

    +0.54%

  • BTI

    0.0400

    59.93

    +0.07%

  • NGG

    0.0900

    90.9

    +0.1%

  • GSK

    -0.8900

    53.39

    -1.67%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.1500

    22.99

    -0.65%

  • RIO

    -2.8700

    87.83

    -3.27%

  • BP

    0.5100

    42.67

    +1.2%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    34.14

    -0.12%

  • VOD

    0.1000

    14.41

    +0.69%

  • AZN

    -2.6000

    189.9

    -1.37%

  • RYCEF

    -1.1300

    16.12

    -7.01%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

(Y.Yildiz--BBZ)