Berliner Boersenzeitung - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.23219
AFN 75.487156
ALL 93.078267
AMD 422.01525
AOA 1057.77368
ARS 1728.100843
AUD 1.638766
AWG 2.074066
AZN 1.960789
BAM 1.952207
BBD 2.320219
BDT 142.597521
BHD 0.434529
BIF 3445.254535
BMD 1.152259
BND 1.477175
BOB 13.933413
BRL 5.903372
BSD 1.151975
BTN 109.6322
BWP 15.580254
BYN 3.410707
BYR 22584.277216
BZD 2.316825
CAD 1.614833
CDF 2604.104891
CHF 0.93644
CLF 0.026727
CLP 1055.331441
CNY 7.776654
CNH 7.777391
COP 3641.26532
CRC 524.003635
CUC 1.152259
CUP 30.534865
CVE 110.789694
CZK 24.243646
DJF 204.779294
DKK 7.474936
DOP 67.163917
DZD 153.33232
EGP 57.257824
ERN 17.283886
ETB 185.933939
FJD 2.552144
FKP 0.85592
GBP 0.856301
GEL 3.013175
GGP 0.85592
GHS 13.521816
GIP 0.85592
GMD 85.266887
GNF 10116.834102
GTQ 8.789821
GYD 241.004293
HKD 9.038838
HNL 30.876033
HRK 7.53416
HTG 150.622097
HUF 365.116225
IDR 20639.263954
ILS 3.465652
IMP 0.85592
INR 109.826937
IQD 1510.035474
IRR 1584183.343658
ISK 142.412461
JEP 0.85592
JMD 182.603882
JOD 0.816933
JPY 182.568546
KES 149.07919
KGS 100.76524
KHR 4670.680341
KMF 492.015232
KRW 1639.987341
KWD 0.35682
KYD 0.960029
KZT 539.828682
LAK 26043.936302
LBP 103184.797064
LKR 386.957729
LRD 209.279064
LSL 18.827806
LTL 3.402321
LVL 0.69699
LYD 7.340045
MAD 10.750001
MDL 20.044018
MGA 4952.861796
MKD 61.416684
MMK 2419.103149
MNT 4143.339409
MOP 9.308326
MRU 46.207516
MUR 54.086968
MVR 17.813958
MWK 2000.321571
MXN 19.83706
MYR 4.71378
MZN 73.632591
NAD 18.827541
NGN 1570.402299
NIO 42.391969
NOK 10.992437
NPR 175.409602
NZD 1.963014
OMR 0.443005
PAB 1.15197
PEN 3.893932
PGK 5.089632
PHP 70.046151
PKR 319.818312
PLN 4.302017
PYG 6852.357161
QAR 4.211049
RON 5.255566
RSD 117.41058
RUB 95.624853
RWF 1692.277688
SAR 4.326884
SBD 9.296827
SCR 16.615673
SDG 691.938217
SEK 10.965245
SGD 1.479159
SLE 28.345475
SOS 658.385256
SRD 43.632019
STD 23849.43576
STN 24.45488
SVC 10.079447
SZL 18.828117
THB 38.16272
TJS 10.626947
TMT 4.038668
TND 3.378795
TRY 54.896043
TTD 7.799609
TWD 37.160649
TZS 3056.226503
UAH 51.582752
UGX 4291.082802
USD 1.152259
UYU 46.394602
UZS 13728.729585
VES 869.046732
VND 30229.515958
VUV 137.515523
WST 3.144764
XAF 654.748965
XAG 0.018726
XAU 0.000272
XCD 3.114038
XCG 2.076187
XDR 0.813364
XOF 654.751801
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.91264
ZAR 18.868009
ZMK 10371.770997
ZMW 21.916468
ZWL 371.026941
  • BCC

    -0.5400

    84.26

    -0.64%

  • GSK

    0.7100

    52.17

    +1.36%

  • NGG

    0.1500

    80.41

    +0.19%

  • BCE

    0.7100

    22.77

    +3.12%

  • BTI

    -0.5400

    58.73

    -0.92%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    21.72

    -0.05%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    161.07

    -0.27%

  • RIO

    -1.8600

    99.65

    -1.87%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    21.98

    -0.27%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.74

    0%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    20.95

    -0.24%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.66

    -0.08%

  • VOD

    0.6900

    16

    +4.31%

  • BP

    1.0200

    42.23

    +2.42%

  • RELX

    -0.8600

    35.75

    -2.41%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

(Y.Yildiz--BBZ)