Berliner Boersenzeitung - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.297817
AFN 73.727012
ALL 95.43889
AMD 432.532408
ANG 2.094649
AOA 1074.307947
ARS 1627.839384
AUD 1.636719
AWG 2.109412
AZN 1.984973
BAM 1.953997
BBD 2.357557
BDT 143.621624
BGN 1.95213
BHD 0.442113
BIF 3531.904009
BMD 1.17027
BND 1.493144
BOB 8.088126
BRL 5.83266
BSD 1.170535
BTN 111.037378
BWP 15.907481
BYN 3.303121
BYR 22937.300519
BZD 2.35415
CAD 1.598946
CDF 2715.027033
CHF 0.91923
CLF 0.026916
CLP 1059.293538
CNY 8.002602
CNH 7.996604
COP 4255.1033
CRC 532.163651
CUC 1.17027
CUP 31.012167
CVE 110.174192
CZK 24.366025
DJF 208.436421
DKK 7.472235
DOP 69.672872
DZD 155.025252
EGP 62.78532
ERN 17.554057
ETB 182.77157
FJD 2.573782
FKP 0.867517
GBP 0.86624
GEL 3.148217
GGP 0.867517
GHS 13.103864
GIP 0.867517
GMD 85.429481
GNF 10271.533952
GTQ 8.942629
GYD 244.881885
HKD 9.16667
HNL 31.120616
HRK 7.533503
HTG 153.334273
HUF 364.735257
IDR 20300.915284
ILS 3.456276
IMP 0.867517
INR 111.185463
IQD 1533.349279
IRR 1539490.756479
ISK 143.80299
JEP 0.867517
JMD 183.410805
JOD 0.829696
JPY 183.23685
KES 151.175473
KGS 102.305628
KHR 4693.0116
KMF 493.854107
KPW 1053.068655
KRW 1728.887052
KWD 0.35987
KYD 0.975471
KZT 542.172394
LAK 25704.813468
LBP 104876.17
LKR 374.101656
LRD 214.787461
LSL 19.622726
LTL 3.455504
LVL 0.707885
LYD 7.442135
MAD 10.811789
MDL 20.16786
MGA 4867.987686
MKD 61.602386
MMK 2457.196354
MNT 4187.344358
MOP 9.445073
MRU 46.418741
MUR 55.037072
MVR 18.086506
MWK 2029.70972
MXN 20.495789
MYR 4.646194
MZN 74.786162
NAD 19.622894
NGN 1609.250543
NIO 43.074497
NOK 10.90967
NPR 177.651262
NZD 1.995754
OMR 0.449982
PAB 1.170505
PEN 4.1253
PGK 5.087807
PHP 71.841783
PKR 326.195442
PLN 4.259937
PYG 7199.066354
QAR 4.280972
RON 5.182428
RSD 117.355892
RUB 87.685907
RWF 1711.245682
SAR 4.389139
SBD 9.407616
SCR 16.035934
SDG 702.744172
SEK 10.852679
SGD 1.493341
SHP 0.873725
SLE 28.734019
SLL 24539.981393
SOS 668.928647
SRD 43.839489
STD 24222.235231
STN 24.479823
SVC 10.242558
SYP 129.483494
SZL 19.627822
THB 38.065372
TJS 10.979269
TMT 4.101798
TND 3.416548
TOP 2.817731
TRY 52.878901
TTD 7.945417
TWD 37.001633
TZS 3048.554094
UAH 51.432608
UGX 4401.372282
USD 1.17027
UYU 46.681524
UZS 13970.485186
VES 568.268993
VND 30843.647576
VUV 138.684442
WST 3.173994
XAF 655.400002
XAG 0.015888
XAU 0.000253
XCD 3.162715
XCG 2.109588
XDR 0.816519
XOF 655.41679
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.255762
ZAR 19.641111
ZMK 10533.840681
ZMW 21.859423
ZWL 376.826602
  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    22.82

    -0.04%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    23.06

    -0.61%

  • RELX

    -0.2100

    35.8

    -0.59%

  • BCE

    -0.2400

    23.26

    -1.03%

  • BCC

    -3.6100

    79

    -4.57%

  • VOD

    -0.1500

    15.34

    -0.98%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4000

    14.9

    -2.68%

  • RIO

    -2.0000

    96.49

    -2.07%

  • NGG

    -1.4700

    85.98

    -1.71%

  • GSK

    -3.0700

    51.4

    -5.97%

  • AZN

    -1.4800

    185.2

    -0.8%

  • BP

    0.4500

    46.8

    +0.96%

  • JRI

    -0.0700

    12.74

    -0.55%

  • BTI

    -1.0200

    57.45

    -1.78%

  • RBGPF

    0.2800

    63.75

    +0.44%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

(Y.Yildiz--BBZ)