Berliner Boersenzeitung - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

EUR -
AED 4.251083
AFN 74.08239
ALL 95.019512
AMD 426.497811
ANG 2.07247
AOA 1062.625575
ARS 1653.355313
AUD 1.642373
AWG 2.085345
AZN 1.970787
BAM 1.95579
BBD 2.331088
BDT 142.359269
BGN 1.957269
BHD 0.436198
BIF 3438.082351
BMD 1.157544
BND 1.485992
BOB 7.997959
BRL 5.858908
BSD 1.157394
BTN 110.027435
BWP 15.58092
BYN 3.202284
BYR 22687.863537
BZD 2.327788
CAD 1.619925
CDF 2656.563402
CHF 0.925481
CLF 0.026526
CLP 1047.464623
CNY 7.838308
CNH 7.829003
COP 4043.179245
CRC 526.497297
CUC 1.157544
CUP 30.674918
CVE 110.264434
CZK 24.163389
DJF 206.108942
DKK 7.479007
DOP 67.959651
DZD 154.093209
EGP 60.014692
ERN 17.363161
ETB 182.378464
FJD 2.564998
FKP 0.863395
GBP 0.866069
GEL 3.073309
GGP 0.863395
GHS 12.846934
GIP 0.863395
GMD 84.50101
GNF 10138.947954
GTQ 8.822955
GYD 242.148757
HKD 9.070573
HNL 30.948841
HRK 7.540009
HTG 151.329223
HUF 352.182562
IDR 20580.323071
ILS 3.380978
IMP 0.863395
INR 110.094596
IQD 1516.192217
IRR 1592638.824291
ISK 144.287703
JEP 0.863395
JMD 183.459058
JOD 0.820752
JPY 185.46753
KES 149.879231
KGS 101.227604
KHR 4649.97613
KMF 493.11366
KPW 1041.790057
KRW 1757.17526
KWD 0.357079
KYD 0.964595
KZT 565.967095
LAK 25485.869174
LBP 103650.567934
LKR 388.018008
LRD 210.648919
LSL 18.852303
LTL 3.417926
LVL 0.700186
LYD 7.376962
MAD 10.719745
MDL 20.213896
MGA 4829.975206
MKD 61.644684
MMK 2429.621781
MNT 4141.565227
MOP 9.341452
MRU 45.903764
MUR 54.693197
MVR 17.896013
MWK 2006.989698
MXN 19.936265
MYR 4.69685
MZN 73.970285
NAD 18.852303
NGN 1574.837995
NIO 42.589781
NOK 11.012292
NPR 176.044096
NZD 1.985326
OMR 0.444788
PAB 1.157394
PEN 3.93618
PGK 5.067974
PHP 70.345146
PKR 322.019447
PLN 4.248129
PYG 7086.963621
QAR 4.231078
RON 5.239158
RSD 117.359398
RUB 83.874369
RWF 1699.691275
SAR 4.345186
SBD 9.313105
SCR 16.281116
SDG 695.109697
SEK 10.972001
SGD 1.486866
SHP 0.864224
SLE 28.533708
SLL 24273.124366
SOS 661.496604
SRD 43.418898
STD 23958.824929
STN 24.499874
SVC 10.126948
SYP 127.945773
SZL 18.836903
THB 38.051883
TJS 10.787045
TMT 4.06298
TND 3.395583
TOP 2.787089
TRY 53.516154
TTD 7.86196
TWD 36.603276
TZS 3038.184404
UAH 51.862034
UGX 4339.977722
USD 1.157544
UYU 46.74976
UZS 13861.928843
VES 673.64184
VND 30454.984166
VUV 136.791375
WST 3.175711
XAF 655.953633
XAG 0.017014
XAU 0.000275
XCD 3.12832
XCG 2.085889
XDR 0.815796
XOF 655.953633
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.181789
ZAR 18.881026
ZMK 10419.284009
ZMW 20.219896
ZWL 372.728714
  • CMSC

    -0.0200

    22.33

    -0.09%

  • BCE

    0.0200

    24.59

    +0.08%

  • NGG

    0.3200

    81.84

    +0.39%

  • BTI

    0.9300

    62.32

    +1.49%

  • GSK

    0.1800

    53.04

    +0.34%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.8

    -0.23%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    22.26

    -0.18%

  • BCC

    0.4800

    71.14

    +0.67%

  • RIO

    1.7100

    105.35

    +1.62%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    60.72

    0%

  • BP

    0.1000

    42.78

    +0.23%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    17.5

    +2.63%

  • AZN

    -3.5300

    178.75

    -1.97%

  • VOD

    0.2700

    15.53

    +1.74%

  • RELX

    0.6300

    33.74

    +1.87%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: Noel Celis - AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

(Y.Yildiz--BBZ)