Berliner Boersenzeitung - GMO skeptics still distrust big agriculture's climate pitch

EUR -
AED 4.097449
AFN 71.405838
ALL 90.616631
AMD 401.812176
ANG 1.996881
AOA 1024.222003
ARS 1713.62359
AUD 1.586729
AWG 2.011067
AZN 1.901136
BAM 1.949248
BBD 2.247416
BDT 138.524382
BGN 1.950072
BHD 0.421299
BIF 3348.664286
BMD 1.11571
BND 1.425553
BOB 13.529886
BRL 6.07404
BSD 1.115884
BTN 105.894855
BWP 15.416733
BYN 3.286955
BYR 21867.912013
BZD 2.244137
CAD 1.557179
CDF 2582.868583
CHF 0.919211
CLF 0.028029
CLP 1106.739931
CNY 7.431859
CNH 7.423714
COP 3564.257673
CRC 507.410374
CUC 1.11571
CUP 26.778989
CVE 109.89512
CZK 24.353323
DJF 198.284384
DKK 7.473331
DOP 67.635085
DZD 151.572144
EGP 62.471162
ERN 16.735647
ETB 180.144444
FJD 2.503323
FKP 0.834157
GBP 0.833173
GEL 2.905153
GGP 0.834157
GHS 12.999654
GIP 0.834157
GMD 82.562922
GNF 9875.80474
GTQ 8.530327
GYD 233.890121
HKD 8.751695
HNL 29.991191
HRK 7.552251
HTG 146.193844
HUF 365.770399
IDR 20257.942776
ILS 3.508417
IMP 0.834157
INR 105.955892
IQD 1691.514361
IRR 2084608.919934
ISK 136.009279
JEP 0.834157
JMD 177.313208
JOD 0.791082
JPY 175.639543
KES 144.89766
KGS 97.567376
KHR 4552.758153
KMF 492.028411
KPW 1004.138774
KRW 1488.758952
KWD 0.347165
KYD 0.92987
KZT 505.929434
LAK 25123.453969
LBP 99922.520078
LKR 371.142489
LRD 189.679884
LSL 18.595196
LTL 3.294401
LVL 0.674882
LYD 7.172858
MAD 10.971273
MDL 19.973579
MGA 5047.215888
MKD 61.373706
MMK 2342.889781
MNT 4014.19357
MOP 9.016372
MRU 45.247533
MUR 52.751181
MVR 17.238138
MWK 1934.449804
MXN 20.968745
MYR 4.527778
MZN 71.305434
NAD 18.595196
NGN 1501.980106
NIO 41.06198
NOK 10.263084
NPR 169.431569
NZD 1.980129
OMR 0.42899
PAB 1.115989
PEN 3.862019
PGK 5.077909
PHP 71.054021
PKR 308.685923
PLN 4.404209
PYG 6537.027277
QAR 4.067528
RON 5.337002
RSD 117.453044
RUB 90.005057
RWF 1647.141366
SAR 4.188821
SBD 8.990619
SCR 15.366815
SDG 671.103544
SEK 10.959674
SGD 1.42586
SHP 0.834925
SLE 25.553845
SLL 23395.881486
SOS 637.665207
SRD 41.972449
STD 23092.94018
STN 24.418688
SVC 9.763183
SYP 14506.458423
SZL 18.59018
THB 37.692586
TJS 10.270839
TMT 3.904984
TND 3.336784
TOP 2.686361
TRY 55.727254
TTD 7.56557
TWD 36.423355
TZS 2946.810525
UAH 50.610698
UGX 4742.208913
USD 1.11571
UYU 44.860819
UZS 13383.494263
VES 990.169911
VND 28789.217736
VUV 133.012093
WST 3.094869
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.022737
XAU 0.000287344858
XCD 3.015262
XCG 2.010941
XDR 0.788865
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.534658
ZAR 18.66081
ZMK 10042.73102
ZMW 22.500973
ZWL 359.258099
SSP 6409.974876
MXV 2.363292
  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    19.81

    -0.61%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    10.77

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.8200

    74.15

    -2.45%

  • CMSC

    -0.2228

    19.53

    -1.14%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    20.34

    +0.98%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    94.17

    +0.01%

  • AZN

    -2.7400

    161.47

    -1.7%

  • GSK

    -1.1800

    48.17

    -2.45%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    65

    0%

  • NGG

    0.8800

    75.82

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    -0.7300

    19.08

    -3.83%

  • BTI

    -0.4500

    54.4

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.4700

    43.99

    +1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    33.18

    -0.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    16.15

    -1.11%

GMO skeptics still distrust big agriculture's climate pitch
GMO skeptics still distrust big agriculture's climate pitch / Photo: JEAN-PIERRE MULLER - AFP/File

GMO skeptics still distrust big agriculture's climate pitch

As a changing climate intensifies extreme weather, agricultural multinationals are hyping the ability of genetically modified crops to boost yields when facing drought, heat or even heavy rainfall.

Text size:

But skeptics of engineered foods, or genetically modified organisms (GMOs), still aren't buying it.

"I don't see why we should evolve our views when they're still doing the same things," said Bill Freese, science director at the non-profit Center for Food Safety, criticizing the "dramatically increased toxic herbicide use" following the proliferation of GMOs.

Seeds designed to thrive in specific local conditions have been developed for centuries through conventional breeding, by crossing together plants with relevant characteristics and selecting the desired offspring.

But as more severe weather creates hostile growing conditions for conventional seeds, companies such as Bayer/Monsanto, Corteva and Syngenta are promoting GMOs as more efficient.

And newer technologies can reduce development times for these heartier varieties "by many years" compared with traditional crop modification techniques, according to a spokesperson for Germany's Bayer.

"Drought tolerance is a complex trait involving many genes," the spokesperson said. "Therefore, the ability to develop drought-tolerant traits through classic breeding methods such as crossbreeding is limited."

Longtime GMO critics say they are open to new approaches but are not sold on the latest industry pitch, viewing conventional seed products as safer and with fewer environmental drawbacks.

"How many times have we read that we won't be able to feed the world by 2050 unless we have GMOs?" said Freese, referring to the argument of GMO proponents that genetically modified crops will be necessary to produce enough food for a growing population on a warming planet.

But for Freese, that claim is "just a really effective smoke screen put on by the pesticide and seeds conglomerates to put a good face on this new technology."

US company Corteva said it, too, is focused on "new breeding technologies such as gene editing" to "take advantage of the genetic diversity that already exists within the plant's DNA" when it comes to creating new seed types.

Such GMO products can help normalize a crop's performance, even if extreme moisture from rain or flooding promotes the spread of fungus or pests, companies say.

In July, the World Economic Forum highlighted the potential for GMOs to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by creating breeds that remove more carbon dioxide than conventionally grown crops.

- Safety, environmental concerns -

Many American growers favor GMO options because, while more costly, they require less human labor, Freese said.

More than 90 percent of the corn, cotton and soybeans grown in the United States is currently genetically modified to withstand herbicides and/or insects, according to US government figures.

Farmers have been growing corn meant to tolerate drought since 2011. Whether or not this trait is acheived with traditional breeding or with GMO seeds, the resulting plants are then usually combined with GMOs that can withstand herbicides.

"They told us in the '70s and '80s that GMOs were going to be more nutritious, fix the nitrogen level, withstand everything," said Michael Hansen, a senior scientist at Consumer Reports. "What did we see? Mainly herbicide-tolerant crops."

Dana Perls, senior food and agricultural program manager at environmental network Friends of the Earth, said GMOs "go hand in hand with harsh chemicals that perpetuate pesticide pollution," harming insect populations, soil health and water quality.

Perls acknowledged "incredible advances" in mapping and manipulating genetic material, but said scientists "are still quite limited in our understanding of the functioning of the incredible complexity of life, both within a single organism and within ecosystems."

For now, she advocates for regulatory oversight of new GMO technology "rooted in a precautionary approach."

Andrew Smith of Rodale Institute said using GMOs to help crops withstand droughts and other extreme conditions is "nearsighted" unless the health of the soil is ensured.

Smith favors agricultural practices such as rotating crops, limiting chemical inputs and reducing soil tillage. Such techniques, known as regenerative agriculture, leads to healthier soil able to retain more water.

"It's a strategy to mitigate climate change," said Smith.

(G.Gruner--BBZ)