Berliner Boersenzeitung - Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case

EUR -
AED 3.998043
AFN 76.035653
ALL 101.177683
AMD 438.48659
ANG 1.962597
AOA 905.775394
ARS 392.655948
AUD 1.632926
AWG 1.962331
AZN 1.855064
BAM 1.954403
BBD 2.198728
BDT 120.054191
BGN 1.954403
BHD 0.410407
BIF 3097.386133
BMD 1.088672
BND 1.455959
BOB 7.524622
BRL 5.359669
BSD 1.088922
BTN 90.682185
BWP 14.735468
BYN 3.587736
BYR 21337.968617
BZD 2.195031
CAD 1.469435
CDF 2906.754282
CHF 0.947219
CLF 0.034258
CLP 945.284355
CNY 7.698874
COP 4373.673902
CRC 576.288096
CUC 1.088672
CUP 28.849805
CVE 110.186244
CZK 24.281524
DJF 193.891415
DKK 7.45708
DOP 62.015674
DZD 146.865145
EGP 33.649249
ERN 16.330078
ETB 61.18187
FJD 2.417727
FKP 0.856704
GBP 0.857289
GEL 2.934014
GGP 0.856704
GHS 13.078652
GIP 0.856704
GMD 73.349311
GNF 9358.311117
GTQ 8.529903
GYD 227.82716
HKD 8.503947
HNL 26.871793
HRK 7.665959
HTG 144.126985
HUF 378.880006
IDR 16802.289446
ILS 4.046784
IMP 0.856704
INR 90.598021
IQD 1426.580347
IRR 46009.998988
ISK 151.140736
JEP 0.856704
JMD 168.299707
JOD 0.772308
JPY 159.84429
KES 165.851457
KGS 97.093749
KHR 4480.797335
KMF 492.570005
KPW 979.804681
KRW 1413.460833
KWD 0.336106
KYD 0.907451
KZT 502.590772
LAK 22546.884541
LBP 16367.201489
LKR 357.474494
LRD 204.834028
LSL 20.380353
LTL 3.214565
LVL 0.658527
LYD 5.226265
MAD 10.964563
MDL 19.329184
MGA 4949.462356
MKD 61.575988
MMK 2286.865455
MNT 3740.242466
MOP 8.764236
MRO 388.65567
MUR 48.298079
MVR 16.722412
MWK 1833.089793
MXN 18.710137
MYR 5.087406
MZN 68.858442
NAD 20.260594
NGN 858.962479
NIO 39.851516
NOK 11.695422
NPR 145.091296
NZD 1.75366
OMR 0.419181
PAB 1.089022
PEN 4.073888
PGK 4.060098
PHP 60.257448
PKR 306.687194
PLN 4.340897
PYG 8102.20892
QAR 3.963583
RON 4.954587
RSD 117.166255
RUB 99.314133
RWF 1353.532558
SAR 4.083939
SBD 9.227524
SCR 14.561028
SDG 654.292162
SEK 11.356791
SGD 1.451857
SHP 1.324642
SLE 24.750966
SLL 21501.269766
SOS 622.179962
SRD 41.168675
STD 22533.309653
SYP 14154.695272
SZL 20.319477
THB 37.96239
TJS 11.907889
TMT 3.821238
TND 3.389077
TOP 2.567201
TRY 31.462403
TTD 7.38772
TWD 34.030835
TZS 2727.85026
UAH 39.712216
UGX 4141.040178
USD 1.088672
UYU 42.579566
UZS 13394.42629
VEF 3868485.236161
VES 38.687206
VND 26443.839679
VUV 129.267066
WST 2.921028
XAF 655.488487
XAG 0.042719
XAU 0.000525
XCD 2.942191
XDR 0.818215
XOF 655.488487
XPF 119.591001
YER 272.549398
ZAR 20.313315
ZMK 9799.35713
ZMW 25.863514
ZWL 350.551897
  • SCU

    -0.0300

    12.72

    -0.24%

  • SCS

    0.1500

    12.46

    +1.2%

  • RELX

    -0.0200

    38.56

    -0.05%

  • NGG

    0.8300

    66.84

    +1.24%

  • RIO

    2.0700

    71.16

    +2.91%

  • RBGPF

    0.3720

    68.01

    +0.55%

  • SLAC

    0.0390

    10.29

    +0.38%

  • RYCEF

    0.1043

    3.53

    +2.95%

  • CMSD

    0.1800

    24.33

    +0.74%

  • GSK

    0.5800

    36.57

    +1.59%

  • CMSC

    0.0600

    24.61

    +0.24%

  • BCE

    0.9200

    40.31

    +2.28%

  • AZN

    0.2000

    64.79

    +0.31%

  • BP

    -0.3100

    35.98

    -0.86%

  • VOD

    0.1600

    9.22

    +1.74%

  • JRI

    0.2100

    11.28

    +1.86%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    32.04

    +0.47%

  • BCC

    3.0900

    112.39

    +2.75%

Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case
Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case / Photo: HANDOUT, JIM WATSON, SAUL LOEB - United States District Court for the District of Columbia/AFP/File

Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case

Does Donald Trump have the right to call prosecutors "fascist thugs," or advise those testifying against him to keep quiet?

Text size:

Those are the questions a federal appeals court in Washington will hear Monday as the ex-president's lawyers contest a gag order imposed on him during one of Trump's criminal trials related to the 2020 election.

The gag order -- a set of restrictions on what Trump is allowed to say publicly about a given set of legal proceedings -- was imposed by Judge Tanya Chutkan, overseeing the federal case against him for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election.

She has restricted statements that "target" prosecutors, court personnel and witnesses, which prosecutors argue could endanger people involved in the trial.

But the gag order, currently temporarily lifted during Trump's appeal, will run up against First Amendment protections guaranteeing free speech.

The country's premier civil liberties group -- hardly a Trump ally, historically -- has criticized the gag order.

"The entire order hinges on the meaning of the word 'target,'" the American Civil Liberties Union has written. "But that meaning is ambiguous."

- 'Cowards and weaklings' -

Chutkan did, while imposing the gag order, recognize Trump's right to criticize his White House successor, Joe Biden, whom the Republican frontrunner will likely face in next year's presidential election, given current polling.

But Trump's lawyers have argued that the restrictions on him in the trial, set to start in March, will have an undue influence on his 2024 campaign. The Iowa Republican Caucus is set for January.

"The Gag Order installs a single federal judge as a barrier between the leading candidate for President, President Donald J. Trump, and every American across the country," his lawyers wrote.

To clarify the restrictions on Trump, Chutkan cited a post that Trump made on his Truth Social website questioning whether his former chief of staff Mark Meadows took an immunity deal to testify against him, saying only "weaklings and cowards" would do so.

The judge said that sort of speech should be restricted.

Prosecutors argue that some of Trump's statements about his trial "consist of ad hominem attacks using inflammatory language likely to arouse angry or violent feelings in the listener, rather than reasoned argument."

"These are precisely the sorts of statements that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to the proceedings," they said, arguing that the gag order is clear on what is and isn't allowed.

Trump has a "pattern," they argue, "stretching back years, in which people publicly targeted by the defendant are... subject to harassment, threats and intimidation."

Catherine Ross, a professor at the George Washington University Law School, told CNN she doubted Trump's appeal would succeed in rescinding the gag order.

"It is a foundational principle that First Amendment rights to speak may sometimes have to give way to the integrity of the judicial process and the importance of guaranteeing a fair trial," she said.

"This is a routine kind of limitation on criminal defendants."

Trump's lawyers have argued that an alternative to the gag order could be to delay the trial until 2025 -- after next year's election.

But prosecutors say that will simply reward Trump for his "egregious" statements.

(Y.Yildiz--BBZ)