Berliner Boersenzeitung - Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case

EUR -
AED 4.130282
AFN 78.61198
ALL 98.040696
AMD 432.126763
ANG 2.012537
AOA 1031.188962
ARS 1280.259425
AUD 1.753726
AWG 2.026955
AZN 1.910634
BAM 1.954999
BBD 2.26949
BDT 136.783948
BGN 1.956244
BHD 0.423907
BIF 3344.707845
BMD 1.124524
BND 1.457116
BOB 7.766886
BRL 6.357834
BSD 1.123949
BTN 96.142457
BWP 15.168919
BYN 3.678293
BYR 22040.67404
BZD 2.257895
CAD 1.568436
CDF 3228.508563
CHF 0.936818
CLF 0.027486
CLP 1054.837633
CNY 8.107253
CNH 8.116748
COP 4689.265854
CRC 568.734067
CUC 1.124524
CUP 29.799891
CVE 110.219833
CZK 24.920558
DJF 200.158657
DKK 7.459418
DOP 66.176413
DZD 149.523439
EGP 56.069113
ERN 16.867863
ETB 152.551543
FJD 2.551152
FKP 0.842042
GBP 0.841684
GEL 3.081089
GGP 0.842042
GHS 13.712503
GIP 0.842042
GMD 81.532721
GNF 9736.010319
GTQ 8.628464
GYD 235.16618
HKD 8.800644
HNL 29.254012
HRK 7.533641
HTG 147.137556
HUF 402.647287
IDR 18468.622964
ILS 3.968508
IMP 0.842042
INR 96.212096
IQD 1472.475165
IRR 47356.519771
ISK 145.907295
JEP 0.842042
JMD 178.72676
JOD 0.797319
JPY 162.586001
KES 145.367168
KGS 98.339353
KHR 4499.376281
KMF 496.471912
KPW 1012.025329
KRW 1568.036965
KWD 0.34533
KYD 0.936625
KZT 575.449306
LAK 24308.254982
LBP 100709.226338
LKR 338.20141
LRD 224.808872
LSL 20.232209
LTL 3.320428
LVL 0.680214
LYD 6.161475
MAD 10.406536
MDL 19.55716
MGA 5072.966281
MKD 61.537144
MMK 2360.776946
MNT 4021.74616
MOP 9.061667
MRU 44.520756
MUR 51.694429
MVR 17.384961
MWK 1949.10528
MXN 21.671335
MYR 4.834301
MZN 71.855996
NAD 20.233288
NGN 1799.879366
NIO 41.364705
NOK 11.590803
NPR 153.826964
NZD 1.903566
OMR 0.432902
PAB 1.123949
PEN 4.148766
PGK 4.674085
PHP 62.692681
PKR 317.860645
PLN 4.247918
PYG 8977.321219
QAR 4.108316
RON 5.073968
RSD 117.185206
RUB 90.412119
RWF 1588.563156
SAR 4.217572
SBD 9.379014
SCR 15.979452
SDG 675.22808
SEK 10.880986
SGD 1.457136
SHP 0.883699
SLE 25.530054
SLL 23580.710152
SOS 642.342489
SRD 40.98722
STD 23275.380239
SVC 9.83497
SYP 14621.023431
SZL 20.226791
THB 37.159887
TJS 11.543885
TMT 3.941457
TND 3.373318
TOP 2.633754
TRY 43.686752
TTD 7.630432
TWD 33.941623
TZS 3030.59227
UAH 46.589208
UGX 4106.35379
USD 1.124524
UYU 47.090703
UZS 14452.077741
VES 105.937178
VND 29203.893103
VUV 136.526218
WST 3.036646
XAF 655.694137
XAG 0.03458
XAU 0.000347
XCD 3.039082
XDR 0.816922
XOF 655.688308
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.495339
ZAR 20.207593
ZMK 10122.068538
ZMW 30.468785
ZWL 362.096329
  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    10.92

    +0.09%

  • RBGPF

    3.9600

    66.96

    +5.91%

  • BCC

    -0.2150

    90.975

    -0.24%

  • NGG

    0.5300

    72.96

    +0.73%

  • SCS

    -0.0450

    10.305

    -0.44%

  • VOD

    0.7180

    10.358

    +6.93%

  • BCE

    0.2150

    21.785

    +0.99%

  • RIO

    0.0500

    62.44

    +0.08%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.84

    +0.39%

  • RELX

    -0.1400

    54.89

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.2450

    38.205

    +0.64%

  • CMSD

    0.1125

    22.281

    +0.5%

  • AZN

    0.2350

    69.925

    +0.34%

  • BTI

    0.5050

    44.085

    +1.15%

  • BP

    -0.1550

    29.245

    -0.53%

  • CMSC

    0.1550

    22.315

    +0.69%

Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case
Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case / Photo: HANDOUT, JIM WATSON, SAUL LOEB - United States District Court for the District of Columbia/AFP/File

Appeals court considers Trump speech restrictions in 2020 election case

Does Donald Trump have the right to call prosecutors "fascist thugs," or advise those testifying against him to keep quiet?

Text size:

Those are the questions a federal appeals court in Washington will hear Monday as the ex-president's lawyers contest a gag order imposed on him during one of Trump's criminal trials related to the 2020 election.

The gag order -- a set of restrictions on what Trump is allowed to say publicly about a given set of legal proceedings -- was imposed by Judge Tanya Chutkan, overseeing the federal case against him for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election.

She has restricted statements that "target" prosecutors, court personnel and witnesses, which prosecutors argue could endanger people involved in the trial.

But the gag order, currently temporarily lifted during Trump's appeal, will run up against First Amendment protections guaranteeing free speech.

The country's premier civil liberties group -- hardly a Trump ally, historically -- has criticized the gag order.

"The entire order hinges on the meaning of the word 'target,'" the American Civil Liberties Union has written. "But that meaning is ambiguous."

- 'Cowards and weaklings' -

Chutkan did, while imposing the gag order, recognize Trump's right to criticize his White House successor, Joe Biden, whom the Republican frontrunner will likely face in next year's presidential election, given current polling.

But Trump's lawyers have argued that the restrictions on him in the trial, set to start in March, will have an undue influence on his 2024 campaign. The Iowa Republican Caucus is set for January.

"The Gag Order installs a single federal judge as a barrier between the leading candidate for President, President Donald J. Trump, and every American across the country," his lawyers wrote.

To clarify the restrictions on Trump, Chutkan cited a post that Trump made on his Truth Social website questioning whether his former chief of staff Mark Meadows took an immunity deal to testify against him, saying only "weaklings and cowards" would do so.

The judge said that sort of speech should be restricted.

Prosecutors argue that some of Trump's statements about his trial "consist of ad hominem attacks using inflammatory language likely to arouse angry or violent feelings in the listener, rather than reasoned argument."

"These are precisely the sorts of statements that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to the proceedings," they said, arguing that the gag order is clear on what is and isn't allowed.

Trump has a "pattern," they argue, "stretching back years, in which people publicly targeted by the defendant are... subject to harassment, threats and intimidation."

Catherine Ross, a professor at the George Washington University Law School, told CNN she doubted Trump's appeal would succeed in rescinding the gag order.

"It is a foundational principle that First Amendment rights to speak may sometimes have to give way to the integrity of the judicial process and the importance of guaranteeing a fair trial," she said.

"This is a routine kind of limitation on criminal defendants."

Trump's lawyers have argued that an alternative to the gag order could be to delay the trial until 2025 -- after next year's election.

But prosecutors say that will simply reward Trump for his "egregious" statements.

(Y.Yildiz--BBZ)