Berliner Boersenzeitung - German court rejects Yemenis' claim over US strikes

EUR -
AED 4.313974
AFN 80.547575
ALL 97.43497
AMD 449.730626
ANG 2.102304
AOA 1077.171309
ARS 1492.791928
AUD 1.764032
AWG 2.116753
AZN 1.997541
BAM 1.955498
BBD 2.367735
BDT 143.357886
BGN 1.958425
BHD 0.442032
BIF 3495.360819
BMD 1.174669
BND 1.502568
BOB 8.10275
BRL 6.532918
BSD 1.172619
BTN 101.493344
BWP 15.744571
BYN 3.837608
BYR 23023.508484
BZD 2.355537
CAD 1.60865
CDF 3393.618188
CHF 0.926898
CLF 0.028411
CLP 1114.548074
CNY 8.403552
CNH 8.419421
COP 4775.56334
CRC 592.408617
CUC 1.174669
CUP 31.128723
CVE 110.247994
CZK 24.570488
DJF 208.817789
DKK 7.463499
DOP 71.149025
DZD 152.157529
EGP 57.684102
ERN 17.620032
ETB 163.190927
FJD 2.634488
FKP 0.873886
GBP 0.867394
GEL 3.183454
GGP 0.873886
GHS 12.25411
GIP 0.873886
GMD 84.575738
GNF 10176.430224
GTQ 9.000612
GYD 245.342154
HKD 9.220684
HNL 30.706263
HRK 7.537609
HTG 153.886262
HUF 396.849551
IDR 19217.346638
ILS 3.939604
IMP 0.873886
INR 101.616249
IQD 1536.163038
IRR 49468.241835
ISK 142.276027
JEP 0.873886
JMD 187.051146
JOD 0.832875
JPY 173.446916
KES 151.506629
KGS 102.547076
KHR 4697.275417
KMF 491.578229
KPW 1057.20192
KRW 1624.960429
KWD 0.358662
KYD 0.977249
KZT 639.00143
LAK 25279.100545
LBP 105069.992316
LKR 353.815422
LRD 235.113732
LSL 20.81239
LTL 3.468492
LVL 0.710545
LYD 6.330024
MAD 10.545173
MDL 19.723957
MGA 5179.201077
MKD 61.550505
MMK 2466.138379
MNT 4214.431849
MOP 9.481137
MRU 46.800781
MUR 53.341668
MVR 18.087317
MWK 2033.386338
MXN 21.791575
MYR 4.958862
MZN 75.131774
NAD 20.81239
NGN 1799.510455
NIO 43.153343
NOK 11.939521
NPR 162.388951
NZD 1.952023
OMR 0.45182
PAB 1.172619
PEN 4.153359
PGK 4.86025
PHP 67.131949
PKR 332.30154
PLN 4.249145
PYG 8783.645069
QAR 4.274541
RON 5.067644
RSD 117.131932
RUB 93.035649
RWF 1695.03853
SAR 4.407248
SBD 9.732243
SCR 16.618437
SDG 705.386032
SEK 11.18223
SGD 1.503814
SHP 0.923105
SLE 26.958871
SLL 24632.222042
SOS 670.196618
SRD 43.06747
STD 24313.272517
STN 24.496221
SVC 10.260417
SYP 15272.795461
SZL 20.804791
THB 38.023791
TJS 11.198873
TMT 4.123087
TND 3.423472
TOP 2.751192
TRY 47.660231
TTD 7.97377
TWD 34.632522
TZS 3004.93647
UAH 49.031737
UGX 4204.351453
USD 1.174669
UYU 46.972754
UZS 14837.711193
VES 141.281409
VND 30711.715781
VUV 139.313268
WST 3.217404
XAF 655.85583
XAG 0.030777
XAU 0.000352
XCD 3.174601
XCG 2.113374
XDR 0.815674
XOF 655.85583
XPF 119.331742
YER 283.035904
ZAR 20.886665
ZMK 10573.453177
ZMW 27.351781
ZWL 378.242874
  • RBGPF

    -1.1200

    73.88

    -1.52%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    22.89

    +0.17%

  • CMSC

    0.0550

    22.485

    +0.24%

  • BCC

    1.7100

    88.14

    +1.94%

  • SCS

    0.0700

    10.58

    +0.66%

  • RELX

    -0.9800

    52.73

    -1.86%

  • NGG

    -0.0800

    72.15

    -0.11%

  • BCE

    -0.2300

    24.2

    -0.95%

  • RIO

    -0.7300

    63.1

    -1.16%

  • GSK

    -0.2600

    37.97

    -0.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0600

    13.09

    -0.46%

  • AZN

    -1.0200

    72.66

    -1.4%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    11.43

    -0.79%

  • BP

    0.0700

    32.2

    +0.22%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0400

    13.2

    -0.3%

  • BTI

    -0.3700

    52.25

    -0.71%

German court rejects Yemenis' claim over US strikes
German court rejects Yemenis' claim over US strikes / Photo: Isaac Brekken - GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

German court rejects Yemenis' claim over US strikes

Germany's highest court on Tuesday threw out a case brought by two Yemenis seeking to sue Berlin over the role of the US Ramstein airbase in a 2012 drone attack, ending a years-long legal saga.

Text size:

Plaintiffs Ahmed and Khalid bin Ali Jaber first brought their case to court in 2014 after losing members of their family in the strike on the village of Khashamir.

The case has since been through several German courts. But the Constitutional Court on Tuesday ultimately ruled that Berlin is not required to take action against such attacks, which were not judged to be in breach of international law.

Washington has for years launched drone strikes targeting suspected Al-Qaeda militants in Yemen, an impoverished country that has been torn by fierce fighting between its beleaguered Saudi-backed government and Iran-backed rebels.

The two Yemeni men, supported by the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), had argued that Germany was partly responsible for the attack because the strike was aided by signals relayed via the Ramstein base in western Germany.

"Without the data that flows through Ramstein, the US cannot fly its combat drones in Yemen," the group said.

The ECCHR's Andreas Schueller argued that "the German government must put an end to the use of this base -- otherwise the government is making itself complicit in the deaths of innocent civilians".

- 'Complaint unfounded' -

The court found that Germany "does have a general duty to protect fundamental human rights and the core norms of international humanitarian law, even in cases involving foreign countries".

However, in order for this duty to be binding, there must be "a serious risk of systematic violation of applicable international law".

"Measured against these standards, the constitutional complaint is unfounded," the court said.

The ECCHR said the ruling had "failed to send a strong signal" and meant that "instead, individual legal protection remains a theoretical possibility without practical consequences".

However, Schueller said the verdict "leaves the door open for future cases".

"Violations of international law can be subject to judicial review, even if the court imposes high hurdles. This is an important statement by the Constitutional Court in these times," he said.

- 'Margin of discretion' -

According to the ECCHR, the two Yemeni men were having dinner ahead of the wedding of a male family member in 2012 when they heard the buzz of a drone and then the boom of missile attacks that claimed multiple lives.

Their case against Germany was initially thrown out, before the higher administrative court in Muenster ruled in their favour in 2019.

However, the government appealed and a higher court overturned the decision in 2020, arguing that German diplomatic efforts were enough to ensure Washington was adhering to international law.

In a statement shared by the ECCHR, the two men called the ruling "dangerous and disturbing".

"(It) suggests countries that provide assistance to the US assassination programme bear no responsibility when civilians are killed. Our hearts are broken, and our faith in international law is shaken," they said.

The German government welcomed the ruling, which it said showed that Berlin had "a wide margin of discretion in assessing whether the actions of third states comply with international law".

"According to the ruling, the government has no fundamental duty to protect foreigners abroad who are affected by military action by third states if, in the government's assessment, these attacks are within the bounds of what is permissible under international law," the defence and foreign ministries said in a statement.

(A.Berg--BBZ)