Berliner Boersenzeitung - Australian court strikes down landmark climate ruling

EUR -
AED 4.171489
AFN 79.205477
ALL 99.208181
AMD 436.288202
ANG 2.032583
AOA 1042.020964
ARS 1336.198046
AUD 1.762522
AWG 2.045724
AZN 1.930425
BAM 1.968862
BBD 2.29412
BDT 138.84112
BGN 1.959812
BHD 0.428198
BIF 3381.93694
BMD 1.135725
BND 1.46512
BOB 7.851087
BRL 6.412187
BSD 1.136238
BTN 97.157571
BWP 15.322656
BYN 3.718268
BYR 22260.205907
BZD 2.282241
CAD 1.567965
CDF 3253.851697
CHF 0.935722
CLF 0.027803
CLP 1066.911134
CNY 8.182101
CNH 8.160852
COP 4659.617601
CRC 578.437555
CUC 1.135725
CUP 30.096707
CVE 111.001422
CZK 24.917012
DJF 202.328553
DKK 7.458702
DOP 67.085066
DZD 150.326826
EGP 56.513323
ERN 17.035872
ETB 154.337529
FJD 2.566114
FKP 0.843778
GBP 0.842157
GEL 3.112
GGP 0.843778
GHS 11.702639
GIP 0.843778
GMD 81.772733
GNF 9844.310562
GTQ 8.725891
GYD 237.714405
HKD 8.90381
HNL 29.603399
HRK 7.536901
HTG 148.495168
HUF 404.321455
IDR 18500.900062
ILS 3.978325
IMP 0.843778
INR 97.004924
IQD 1488.374391
IRR 47842.407145
ISK 144.20264
JEP 0.843778
JMD 181.016505
JOD 0.805264
JPY 163.891915
KES 146.792117
KGS 99.319593
KHR 4549.180839
KMF 493.474228
KPW 1022.037245
KRW 1558.646043
KWD 0.348463
KYD 0.946882
KZT 577.702679
LAK 24543.832274
LBP 101802.392289
LKR 340.08625
LRD 227.237573
LSL 20.284676
LTL 3.3535
LVL 0.686989
LYD 6.224487
MAD 10.514581
MDL 19.695668
MGA 5165.268176
MKD 61.529865
MMK 2384.850427
MNT 4060.498584
MOP 9.175071
MRU 44.981422
MUR 52.061388
MVR 17.558318
MWK 1970.231917
MXN 21.978955
MYR 4.820052
MZN 72.583895
NAD 20.284676
NGN 1806.665968
NIO 41.807365
NOK 11.503688
NPR 155.447291
NZD 1.899269
OMR 0.436674
PAB 1.136138
PEN 4.136845
PGK 4.732543
PHP 63.26438
PKR 320.404977
PLN 4.234652
PYG 9078.50975
QAR 4.141504
RON 5.055139
RSD 117.25447
RUB 89.318438
RWF 1606.357129
SAR 4.260437
SBD 9.484173
SCR 16.143981
SDG 682.007896
SEK 10.858739
SGD 1.461513
SHP 0.892501
SLE 25.803246
SLL 23815.581251
SOS 649.307732
SRD 42.25581
STD 23507.210158
SVC 9.941958
SYP 14766.381857
SZL 20.274508
THB 37.02974
TJS 11.333842
TMT 3.980715
TND 3.40952
TOP 2.659983
TRY 44.408589
TTD 7.717199
TWD 33.886397
TZS 3046.587341
UAH 47.171808
UGX 4130.402519
USD 1.135725
UYU 47.223296
UZS 14578.720274
VES 107.71955
VND 29557.23769
VUV 137.130298
WST 3.05888
XAF 660.33791
XAG 0.034149
XAU 0.000342
XCD 3.069353
XDR 0.817441
XOF 660.358397
XPF 119.331742
YER 276.946237
ZAR 20.199155
ZMK 10222.880099
ZMW 30.142979
ZWL 365.702919
  • CMSC

    -0.0050

    22.085

    -0.02%

  • BCC

    0.3300

    87.06

    +0.38%

  • RYCEF

    0.0600

    11.59

    +0.52%

  • SCS

    -0.0050

    10.285

    -0.05%

  • RELX

    -1.0600

    53.99

    -1.96%

  • RIO

    0.1800

    60.13

    +0.3%

  • AZN

    0.1500

    70.53

    +0.21%

  • JRI

    0.0230

    12.763

    +0.18%

  • GSK

    0.4800

    39.66

    +1.21%

  • RBGPF

    -0.2380

    65.43

    -0.36%

  • NGG

    -0.2600

    72.41

    -0.36%

  • BCE

    0.2850

    21.445

    +1.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0150

    10.375

    -0.14%

  • BTI

    -0.4650

    44.625

    -1.04%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    22.06

    +0.05%

  • BP

    0.0050

    28.945

    +0.02%

Australian court strikes down landmark climate ruling
Australian court strikes down landmark climate ruling

Australian court strikes down landmark climate ruling

An Australian court on Tuesday threw out a landmark legal ruling that the country's environment minister had a duty to protect children from climate change.

Text size:

Last year's legal win by a group of high school children had been hailed by environmental groups as a potential legal weapon to fight fossil fuel projects.

But the federal court found in favour of an appeal by Environment Minister Sussan Ley, deciding she did not have to weigh the harm climate change would inflict on children when assessing the approval of new fossil fuel projects.

The judgement overturned a July 2021 ruling by a lower court that found the minister had a duty to "avoid causing personal injury or death" to under 18s due to "emissions of carbon dioxide into the Earth's atmosphere".

Anjali Sharma, 17, who launched the legal action in 2020, said the minister's successful appeal had left the students "devastated".

"Two years ago, Australia was on fire; today, it's underwater. Burning coal makes bushfires and floods more catastrophic and more deadly. Something needs to change," she said.

Izzy Raj-Seppings, 15, said the court had accepted that young people would "bear the brunt of the impacts of the climate crisis", which she described as an important step in climate litigation.

However, the federal court found emissions from the mine at the centre of the case -- Whitehaven's Vickery coal mine -- posed only a "tiny increase in risk" to the students.

Minister Ley welcomed the verdict.

"The minister always takes her role as the environment minister seriously," a spokesperson said in a statement.

- 'Disappointed but not surprised' -

Lawyer George Newhouse of Macquarie University said the Sharma decision reflected Australia's lack of a bill of rights.

"We don't have the scope for the successful climate change litigation that we see in Europe because Australia has a constitution that, quite intentionally, contains no human rights," he told AFP.

Newhouse said landmark cases, such as the Urgenda precedent -- in which Dutch citizens successful sued their government to take climate action -- would fail in Australia because of this.

"I am disappointed by the Sharma decision, but not surprised," he said.

Sharma and her fellow students will consider whether to appeal to Australia's highest court.

Climate and environmental law expert Laura Schuijers from the University of Sydney said the High Court may well elect to hear their appeal, given the importance of the questions raised.

Schuijers said Australia's lack of a constitutional protection of human rights made it "a very interesting place for climate litigation".

"It means that litigants are seeking creative ways to test the bounds of the law and to ask the ultimate question: in the face of inaction, who is responsible for picking up the slack?" she said.

The ruling had "put the spotlight on Australia's politicians and policymakers to take the proactive action that the science presented in the courtroom suggests is urgently needed".

Australia has been at the sharp end of climate change, with droughts, deadly bushfires, bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef and floods becoming more common and intense as global weather patterns change.

(K.Müller--BBZ)