Berliner Boersenzeitung - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

EUR -
AED 4.353775
AFN 77.651281
ALL 96.591272
AMD 443.056226
ANG 2.122154
AOA 1087.110488
ARS 1700.603942
AUD 1.711542
AWG 2.135692
AZN 2.017903
BAM 1.955615
BBD 2.363796
BDT 143.566421
BGN 1.990907
BHD 0.446969
BIF 3475.871245
BMD 1.185508
BND 1.501158
BOB 8.110267
BRL 6.327414
BSD 1.173594
BTN 107.731356
BWP 16.279529
BYN 3.322514
BYR 23235.954299
BZD 2.360397
CAD 1.621704
CDF 2584.407062
CHF 0.920667
CLF 0.025863
CLP 1021.19817
CNY 8.267252
CNH 8.242208
COP 4320.678282
CRC 580.847512
CUC 1.185508
CUP 31.415959
CVE 110.255037
CZK 24.262245
DJF 209.001114
DKK 7.468284
DOP 73.943318
DZD 153.313409
EGP 55.754551
ERN 17.782618
ETB 182.81528
FJD 2.622284
FKP 0.870137
GBP 0.867194
GEL 3.189324
GGP 0.870137
GHS 12.792844
GIP 0.870137
GMD 86.541891
GNF 10280.114402
GTQ 9.00811
GYD 245.547811
HKD 9.243648
HNL 30.958202
HRK 7.534607
HTG 153.925441
HUF 381.81712
IDR 19872.668465
ILS 3.716958
IMP 0.870137
INR 108.567651
IQD 1537.561059
IRR 49939.519312
ISK 145.793457
JEP 0.870137
JMD 184.743306
JOD 0.840529
JPY 182.432472
KES 151.270002
KGS 103.672192
KHR 4723.553237
KMF 497.913012
KPW 1066.977853
KRW 1708.352647
KWD 0.363738
KYD 0.978112
KZT 590.819103
LAK 25362.815077
LBP 105100.245961
LKR 363.598677
LRD 217.113971
LSL 18.943068
LTL 3.500496
LVL 0.717102
LYD 7.467325
MAD 10.750329
MDL 19.975279
MGA 5309.520209
MKD 61.615794
MMK 2489.48933
MNT 4227.601955
MOP 9.426548
MRU 46.922958
MUR 53.964287
MVR 18.316262
MWK 2035.116098
MXN 20.59251
MYR 4.704686
MZN 75.765859
NAD 18.943068
NGN 1673.557874
NIO 43.18628
NOK 11.562466
NPR 172.371424
NZD 1.984564
OMR 0.455848
PAB 1.173694
PEN 3.937344
PGK 5.019568
PHP 69.915281
PKR 328.385626
PLN 4.205998
PYG 7848.290795
QAR 4.278913
RON 5.096975
RSD 117.410313
RUB 90.081094
RWF 1711.745319
SAR 4.445717
SBD 9.630605
SCR 17.384702
SDG 713.087647
SEK 10.58398
SGD 1.50419
SHP 0.889438
SLE 28.922903
SLL 24859.506462
SOS 669.539498
SRD 45.192723
STD 24537.619428
STN 24.49789
SVC 10.269072
SYP 13111.213103
SZL 18.938289
THB 36.826634
TJS 10.973377
TMT 4.149278
TND 3.416662
TOP 2.854418
TRY 51.425668
TTD 7.972313
TWD 37.364245
TZS 3026.013534
UAH 50.605727
UGX 4148.625112
USD 1.185508
UYU 44.445046
UZS 14244.893008
VES 417.613423
VND 31045.487409
VUV 141.983286
WST 3.266772
XAF 655.89773
XAG 0.010813
XAU 0.000233
XCD 3.203895
XCG 2.115209
XDR 0.815726
XOF 655.89773
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.503601
ZAR 18.992428
ZMK 10670.990146
ZMW 23.025016
ZWL 381.733051
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    -0.8100

    83.23

    -0.97%

  • CMSC

    0.1000

    23.75

    +0.42%

  • BCC

    -1.1800

    84.33

    -1.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    24.13

    +0.37%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    13.68

    +0.07%

  • RYCEF

    0.3000

    17.12

    +1.75%

  • RIO

    3.1300

    90.43

    +3.46%

  • NGG

    1.3200

    81.5

    +1.62%

  • VOD

    0.2300

    14.17

    +1.62%

  • BCE

    0.4900

    25.2

    +1.94%

  • RELX

    0.0600

    39.9

    +0.15%

  • GSK

    0.5000

    49.15

    +1.02%

  • AZN

    1.2600

    92.95

    +1.36%

  • BTI

    0.9400

    59.16

    +1.59%

  • BP

    1.1000

    36.53

    +3.01%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: SAMUEL CORUM - AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

(K.Müller--BBZ)