Berliner Boersenzeitung - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

EUR -
AED 4.276798
AFN 76.973093
ALL 96.541337
AMD 443.660189
ANG 2.0846
AOA 1067.888653
ARS 1669.958677
AUD 1.752514
AWG 2.096182
AZN 1.984351
BAM 1.955625
BBD 2.34549
BDT 142.477215
BGN 1.956439
BHD 0.438161
BIF 3440.791247
BMD 1.164546
BND 1.508565
BOB 8.047278
BRL 6.334667
BSD 1.164496
BTN 104.702605
BWP 15.471612
BYN 3.348
BYR 22825.091832
BZD 2.34209
CAD 1.610159
CDF 2599.265981
CHF 0.936209
CLF 0.027366
CLP 1073.571668
CNY 8.233458
CNH 8.232219
COP 4424.302993
CRC 568.848955
CUC 1.164546
CUP 30.860456
CVE 110.255106
CZK 24.203336
DJF 207.371392
DKK 7.470448
DOP 74.533312
DZD 151.068444
EGP 55.295038
ERN 17.468183
ETB 180.629892
FJD 2.632397
FKP 0.873977
GBP 0.872678
GEL 3.138497
GGP 0.873977
GHS 13.246811
GIP 0.873977
GMD 85.012236
GNF 10119.091982
GTQ 8.9202
GYD 243.638138
HKD 9.065875
HNL 30.671248
HRK 7.535429
HTG 152.446321
HUF 381.994667
IDR 19435.740377
ILS 3.768132
IMP 0.873977
INR 104.760771
IQD 1525.563106
IRR 49041.926882
ISK 149.038983
JEP 0.873977
JMD 186.393274
JOD 0.825709
JPY 180.924237
KES 150.636483
KGS 101.839952
KHR 4662.581612
KMF 491.43861
KPW 1048.137083
KRW 1716.311573
KWD 0.357481
KYD 0.970513
KZT 588.927154
LAK 25252.733992
LBP 104283.942272
LKR 359.197768
LRD 204.961608
LSL 19.736529
LTL 3.438601
LVL 0.704422
LYD 6.330432
MAD 10.755735
MDL 19.814222
MGA 5194.533878
MKD 61.634469
MMK 2445.172268
MNT 4132.506664
MOP 9.338362
MRU 46.438833
MUR 53.651052
MVR 17.938355
MWK 2019.3188
MXN 21.165153
MYR 4.787492
MZN 74.426542
NAD 19.736529
NGN 1688.68458
NIO 42.856154
NOK 11.767853
NPR 167.523968
NZD 2.015483
OMR 0.44694
PAB 1.164595
PEN 3.914449
PGK 4.941557
PHP 68.66747
PKR 326.476804
PLN 4.229804
PYG 8009.281302
QAR 4.244719
RON 5.092096
RSD 117.389466
RUB 89.441974
RWF 1694.347961
SAR 4.370508
SBD 9.584899
SCR 15.747587
SDG 700.4784
SEK 10.946786
SGD 1.508673
SHP 0.873711
SLE 27.603998
SLL 24419.93473
SOS 664.340387
SRD 44.985272
STD 24103.740676
STN 24.497802
SVC 10.190086
SYP 12876.900539
SZL 19.72123
THB 37.119932
TJS 10.684641
TMT 4.087555
TND 3.416093
TOP 2.803946
TRY 49.523506
TTD 7.894292
TWD 36.437508
TZS 2841.64501
UAH 48.888813
UGX 4119.630333
USD 1.164546
UYU 45.545913
UZS 13931.74986
VES 296.437311
VND 30697.419423
VUV 142.156724
WST 3.247609
XAF 655.898144
XAG 0.019964
XAU 0.000277
XCD 3.147243
XCG 2.098812
XDR 0.815727
XOF 655.898144
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.802752
ZAR 19.711451
ZMK 10482.311144
ZMW 26.923584
ZWL 374.983176
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • VOD

    -0.1630

    12.47

    -1.31%

  • NGG

    -0.5000

    75.41

    -0.66%

  • RELX

    -0.2200

    40.32

    -0.55%

  • GSK

    -0.1600

    48.41

    -0.33%

  • BTI

    -1.0300

    57.01

    -1.81%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    14.62

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    23.43

    -0.21%

  • BP

    -1.4000

    35.83

    -3.91%

  • AZN

    0.1500

    90.18

    +0.17%

  • RIO

    -0.6700

    73.06

    -0.92%

  • SCS

    -0.0900

    16.14

    -0.56%

  • BCE

    0.3300

    23.55

    +1.4%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    23.25

    -0.3%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    13.79

    +0.29%

  • BCC

    -1.2100

    73.05

    -1.66%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: SAMUEL CORUM - AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

(K.Müller--BBZ)