Berliner Boersenzeitung - Reverse Apartheid" in SA?

EUR -
AED 4.324438
AFN 82.328185
ALL 97.949419
AMD 453.271707
ANG 2.107025
AOA 1079.636914
ARS 1449.927532
AUD 1.795358
AWG 2.122186
AZN 1.990127
BAM 1.954815
BBD 2.380071
BDT 144.607168
BGN 1.955302
BHD 0.443822
BIF 3511.586629
BMD 1.177357
BND 1.500925
BOB 8.145897
BRL 6.365024
BSD 1.178791
BTN 100.508378
BWP 15.572091
BYN 3.857757
BYR 23076.197533
BZD 2.367907
CAD 1.60034
CDF 3396.675125
CHF 0.934236
CLF 0.02847
CLP 1093.644109
CNY 8.436237
CNH 8.434891
COP 4697.183555
CRC 595.092696
CUC 1.177357
CUP 31.199961
CVE 110.209492
CZK 24.624403
DJF 209.911602
DKK 7.461312
DOP 70.463613
DZD 152.811006
EGP 58.09939
ERN 17.660355
ETB 162.604613
FJD 2.634572
FKP 0.862382
GBP 0.862196
GEL 3.202678
GGP 0.862382
GHS 12.200855
GIP 0.862382
GMD 84.181539
GNF 10220.808822
GTQ 9.063435
GYD 246.625785
HKD 9.242194
HNL 30.798357
HRK 7.534265
HTG 154.780072
HUF 398.487987
IDR 19055.287849
ILS 3.930624
IMP 0.862382
INR 100.608101
IQD 1544.202579
IRR 49596.16423
ISK 142.389078
JEP 0.862382
JMD 188.32435
JOD 0.834746
JPY 169.961488
KES 152.345617
KGS 102.959991
KHR 4731.556641
KMF 492.135408
KPW 1059.578096
KRW 1605.597618
KWD 0.359353
KYD 0.982393
KZT 612.503705
LAK 25399.88359
LBP 105621.403141
LKR 353.647378
LRD 236.35096
LSL 20.645002
LTL 3.476429
LVL 0.712172
LYD 6.347722
MAD 10.576473
MDL 19.851002
MGA 5177.370399
MKD 61.514133
MMK 2472.040219
MNT 4224.807876
MOP 9.5308
MRU 46.751453
MUR 52.922057
MVR 18.128529
MWK 2044.161764
MXN 21.964892
MYR 4.973745
MZN 75.303303
NAD 20.644739
NGN 1800.6381
NIO 43.377968
NOK 11.869454
NPR 160.810958
NZD 1.941497
OMR 0.452699
PAB 1.178806
PEN 4.198286
PGK 4.866528
PHP 66.42671
PKR 334.519655
PLN 4.249107
PYG 9398.14683
QAR 4.295936
RON 5.059923
RSD 117.183551
RUB 92.839359
RWF 1693.339948
SAR 4.415489
SBD 9.815536
SCR 17.271949
SDG 706.982177
SEK 11.24715
SGD 1.499715
SHP 0.925218
SLE 26.431679
SLL 24688.592283
SOS 673.657847
SRD 43.779986
STD 24368.913178
SVC 10.314674
SYP 15308.030561
SZL 20.654334
THB 38.075993
TJS 11.428398
TMT 4.132523
TND 3.429373
TOP 2.757486
TRY 46.920697
TTD 7.986876
TWD 34.069761
TZS 3114.646199
UAH 49.220701
UGX 4228.870104
USD 1.177357
UYU 47.226214
UZS 14843.523969
VES 128.889394
VND 30817.908599
VUV 140.260432
WST 3.06316
XAF 655.624007
XAG 0.031985
XAU 0.000352
XCD 3.181866
XDR 0.815386
XOF 655.618441
XPF 119.331742
YER 285.096832
ZAR 20.707824
ZMK 10597.623008
ZMW 28.438677
ZWL 379.108479
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Reverse Apartheid" in SA?




Recent claims have surfaced suggesting that white South Africans face systemic discrimination akin to apartheid, a term historically associated with the institutionalised racial segregation of black South Africans by the white minority from 1948 to 1994. These allegations, often amplified on social media and by certain political figures, point to issues such as land reform policies, farm attacks, and affirmative action programmes as evidence of a supposed "reverse apartheid." This article examines the validity of these claims, exploring the socio-political context, economic realities, and lived experiences in contemporary South Africa.

The notion of apartheid against whites primarily stems from debates over land reform. In 2025, South Africa’s government, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, implemented a law allowing expropriation of land without compensation under specific conditions. The policy aims to address historical inequalities, as white South Africans, who make up roughly 8% of the population, still own a disproportionate share of arable land—estimated at over 70%—decades after apartheid’s end. Critics argue this policy targets white farmers unfairly, with some claiming it constitutes racial persecution. However, no documented cases of such expropriations have occurred to date, and the policy requires judicial oversight to ensure fairness. The land reform debate is less about race and more about correcting colonial and apartheid-era dispossessions, though its implementation remains contentious.

Another focal point is the issue of farm attacks, which some allege are racially motivated against white farmers. South Africa’s rural crime rates are high, with farmers of all backgrounds facing risks due to the country’s economic inequality and unemployment, which hovers around 33%. Data from the South African Police Service indicates that farm attacks, while tragic, are not disproportionately racial. In 2024, approximately 50 farm murders were recorded, affecting both white and black farmers, with motives often tied to robbery rather than race. Nonetheless, the narrative of a "white genocide" persists, fuelled by inflammatory rhetoric from figures like Julius Malema of the Economic Freedom Fighters, whose past chants of "Kill the Boer" have been widely condemned. Courts have ruled such statements as hate speech, and Malema has since distanced himself from inciting violence.

Affirmative action policies, designed to uplift historically disadvantaged black, coloured, and Indian populations, are also cited as evidence of anti-white discrimination. Programmes like Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) prioritise non-white hiring and business ownership to address the economic legacy of apartheid, where whites dominated wealth and opportunity. Some white South Africans, particularly Afrikaans-speaking Afrikaners, feel marginalised, claiming these policies limit their job prospects. For instance, in 2018, white employees at the Sasol corporation protested against alleged exclusion from bonus schemes. Yet, economic data paints a different picture: white South Africans still enjoy higher average incomes and lower unemployment rates (around 7%) compared to black South Africans (over 40%). The Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality, remains among the world’s highest at 63.3%, reflecting persistent disparities that affirmative action seeks to address.

Social tensions also play a role. Many white South Africans report feeling culturally alienated in a nation where African languages and traditions dominate public life. Afrikaans, once a symbol of white authority, is less prominent in schools and government, prompting some to perceive this as erasure. Conversely, black South Africans argue that these shifts are necessary to reflect the country’s 80% black majority. Incidents of racism, such as black students reporting unfair treatment in schools, highlight that prejudice cuts both ways, complicating claims of one-sided oppression.

The "apartheid against whites" narrative has gained traction internationally, particularly in the United States, where former President Donald Trump in 2025 claimed white South Africans face "genocide." He offered asylum to white farmers, citing videos purportedly showing attacks. These claims were debunked, with South African authorities and independent analysts confirming no evidence of genocide. The videos, some dating back to the apartheid era, were misrepresented. Such international interventions often overlook South Africa’s complex reality, where poverty, not race, drives much of the crime and unrest. The country’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, established post-1994, aimed to heal racial divides, but its recommendations for economic justice remain only partially implemented, leaving both black and white communities frustrated.

South Africa’s challenges—high crime, unemployment, and inequality—stem from apartheid’s long shadow, not a new racial regime. White South Africans, while facing real anxieties about their place in a transforming society, retain significant economic advantages. Claims of apartheid against whites exaggerate isolated incidents and mischaracterise policies aimed at historical redress. The country’s path forward lies in addressing poverty and fostering dialogue, not in perpetuating narratives of racial victimhood.