Berliner Boersenzeitung - Trump’s 50% tariffs on europe

EUR -
AED 4.32182
AFN 82.262768
ALL 97.889674
AMD 452.732813
ANG 2.10576
AOA 1078.988694
ARS 1460.811676
AUD 1.808653
AWG 2.120912
AZN 2.00049
BAM 1.955078
BBD 2.377293
BDT 144.426666
BGN 1.953881
BHD 0.443514
BIF 3507.653733
BMD 1.17665
BND 1.49951
BOB 8.135996
BRL 6.379682
BSD 1.177415
BTN 100.482455
BWP 15.595169
BYN 3.853026
BYR 23062.349449
BZD 2.364987
CAD 1.604381
CDF 3394.63644
CHF 0.935318
CLF 0.028529
CLP 1094.790994
CNY 8.431175
CNH 8.439702
COP 4697.953547
CRC 594.605689
CUC 1.17665
CUP 31.181238
CVE 110.224296
CZK 24.644916
DJF 209.664157
DKK 7.461411
DOP 70.466972
DZD 152.223964
EGP 58.071582
ERN 17.649757
ETB 163.405301
FJD 2.644228
FKP 0.86208
GBP 0.864073
GEL 3.200704
GGP 0.86208
GHS 12.1855
GIP 0.86208
GMD 84.134958
GNF 10211.619549
GTQ 9.052657
GYD 246.319038
HKD 9.236606
HNL 30.761947
HRK 7.531266
HTG 154.589482
HUF 399.193377
IDR 19104.332557
ILS 3.935696
IMP 0.86208
INR 100.876837
IQD 1542.350097
IRR 49566.401414
ISK 142.398592
JEP 0.86208
JMD 187.92699
JOD 0.834256
JPY 170.717276
KES 152.020778
KGS 102.89788
KHR 4730.454134
KMF 491.840015
KPW 1058.985622
KRW 1608.73416
KWD 0.359055
KYD 0.98125
KZT 611.461992
LAK 25370.954349
LBP 105492.188268
LKR 353.244056
LRD 236.068842
LSL 20.710516
LTL 3.474343
LVL 0.711744
LYD 6.342008
MAD 10.567598
MDL 19.832929
MGA 5298.268577
MKD 61.537902
MMK 2470.426162
MNT 4216.645015
MOP 9.519606
MRU 46.730729
MUR 52.890159
MVR 18.121555
MWK 2041.715435
MXN 21.948944
MYR 4.983096
MZN 75.258156
NAD 20.710516
NGN 1801.326978
NIO 43.325657
NOK 11.876216
NPR 160.77446
NZD 1.957611
OMR 0.452406
PAB 1.17737
PEN 4.174858
PGK 4.86339
PHP 66.61609
PKR 334.240855
PLN 4.244543
PYG 9383.053325
QAR 4.303111
RON 5.057478
RSD 117.184932
RUB 92.830315
RWF 1692.532513
SAR 4.411366
SBD 9.809646
SCR 16.58551
SDG 706.577172
SEK 11.255897
SGD 1.502106
SHP 0.924663
SLE 26.415732
SLL 24673.776596
SOS 672.874393
SRD 43.989059
STD 24354.289331
SVC 10.302327
SYP 15298.723108
SZL 20.695589
THB 38.335862
TJS 11.449918
TMT 4.130043
TND 3.430333
TOP 2.755837
TRY 47.026364
TTD 7.985153
TWD 34.147593
TZS 3107.45741
UAH 49.103536
UGX 4223.440352
USD 1.17665
UYU 47.25255
UZS 14784.79152
VES 128.81205
VND 30767.056806
VUV 139.348855
WST 3.049888
XAF 655.737139
XAG 0.032118
XAU 0.000355
XCD 3.179957
XDR 0.815533
XOF 655.751066
XPF 119.331742
YER 284.925921
ZAR 20.832814
ZMK 10591.263284
ZMW 28.522194
ZWL 378.880975
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Trump’s 50% tariffs on europe




In a move that has sent shockwaves through global markets, U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on imports from the European Union, initially set for June 1, 2025, but later delayed to July 9 to allow for negotiations. This aggressive trade policy has sparked intense debate about its motivations and potential consequences for the European economy, which relies heavily on exports to the United States. The proposed tariffs, described as a tool to reshape global trade dynamics, raise questions about the strategic intent behind such a drastic measure and its implications for transatlantic relations.

The European Union, a key trading partner of the United States, exported goods worth billions to the U.S. in 2024, with sectors like pharmaceuticals, automotive, and luxury goods leading the charge. A 50% tariff would significantly increase the cost of these goods, potentially reducing demand and squeezing profit margins for European companies. For instance, Germany’s automotive industry, including brands like BMW and Porsche, faces heightened risks, as does France’s luxury sector, which employs over 600,000 people. Italy’s high-end leather goods and the European aerospace sector, exemplified by companies like Airbus, could also face severe disruptions. The European Commission has estimated that such tariffs could shave 0.5% off the EU’s GDP, a substantial blow to an economy already grappling with global uncertainties.

Trump’s rationale appears rooted in a long-standing belief that tariffs are a solution to perceived trade imbalances. He has publicly expressed frustration with the EU, accusing it of being “very difficult to deal with” and slow to negotiate. His administration argues that the EU benefits disproportionately from trade with the U.S., a claim that resonates with his domestic base but overlooks the mutual benefits of transatlantic commerce. The president’s strategy seems to leverage tariffs as a negotiating tactic, pressuring the EU to concede to terms more favourable to U.S. interests, such as increased purchases of American goods like soya beans, arms, and liquefied natural gas. The delay to July 9, following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, suggests a willingness to negotiate, but the threat of tariffs remains a powerful bargaining chip.

Critics argue that Trump’s approach is less about economic fairness and more about political posturing. By targeting the EU, he reinforces a narrative of protecting American jobs and manufacturing, a cornerstone of his economic agenda. His recent announcement to double steel tariffs to 50% and impose 25% tariffs on autos underscores this focus on domestic industry. However, the broader economic fallout could be severe. European officials, including Germany’s Lars Klingbeil, have warned that such a trade conflict harms both sides, endangering jobs and economic stability. The EU has signalled readiness to retaliate with counter-tariffs, potentially targeting U.S. products like Boeing aircraft, which could escalate tensions into a full-blown trade war.

The timing of the tariff threat adds to its disruptive potential. Europe’s economy, while showing resilience in some areas—Germany’s GDP grew unexpectedly in early 2025 due to strong exports—is not immune to external shocks. The uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariffs has already rattled markets, with European stocks tumbling after the initial announcement before recovering slightly upon the delay. Companies like HP, which cited tariff-related costs as a factor in cutting earnings forecasts, illustrate the ripple effects on global supply chains. Small businesses and consumers, particularly in the U.S., could face higher prices, while European exporters risk losing market share if forced to absorb tariff costs.

Trump’s tariff strategy also faces legal challenges. A U.S. trade court recently ruled that his use of emergency powers to impose tariffs was unlawful, though an appeals court temporarily reinstated them. This legal uncertainty complicates the administration’s plans, yet Trump’s team has hinted at alternative mechanisms, such as invoking a 1930 trade law to bypass judicial rulings. These manoeuvres reflect a determination to press forward, regardless of opposition, aligning with Trump’s broader goal of reshaping the global economic order.

For the EU, the path forward involves balancing diplomacy with resolve. The European Commission, led by Ursula von der Leyen, has committed to fast-tracking trade talks, with negotiations set to intensify in the coming weeks. EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič is expected to engage directly with U.S. counterparts, aiming for a deal that could reduce tariffs to zero on industrial goods. However, the EU remains firm in defending its interests, preparing countermeasures should talks falter. The bloc’s unity will be tested as member states like Italy, with leaders like Giorgia Meloni fostering ties with the White House, push for compromise, while others advocate a harder line.

The stakes are high for both sides. A failure to reach an agreement by July 9 could trigger a tariff regime that disrupts supply chains, inflates consumer prices, and erodes economic confidence. For Trump, the tariffs are a high-stakes gamble to assert U.S. dominance in global trade, but they risk alienating a key ally and destabilising an interconnected economy. For Europe, the challenge is to navigate this turbulent period without sacrificing its economic vitality or succumbing to pressure. As negotiations unfold, the world watches closely, aware that the outcome will shape the future of transatlantic trade and beyond.