Berliner Boersenzeitung - China’s profitless push

EUR -
AED 4.186804
AFN 72.962441
ALL 94.259056
AMD 418.549568
ANG 2.041136
AOA 1045.418899
ARS 1684.10666
AUD 1.651889
AWG 2.052077
AZN 1.936931
BAM 1.955487
BBD 2.296633
BDT 140.257564
BGN 1.927676
BHD 0.429931
BIF 3386.658257
BMD 1.140043
BND 1.475464
BOB 7.880051
BRL 5.900179
BSD 1.140318
BTN 107.028002
BWP 15.497201
BYN 3.307171
BYR 22344.835632
BZD 2.293293
CAD 1.616934
CDF 2587.896628
CHF 0.921609
CLF 0.026661
CLP 1049.283409
CNY 7.756679
CNH 7.75807
COP 3917.562706
CRC 517.717184
CUC 1.140043
CUP 30.21113
CVE 110.246881
CZK 24.264557
DJF 203.065532
DKK 7.474507
DOP 66.999283
DZD 151.982519
EGP 56.441918
ERN 17.10064
ETB 183.847154
FJD 2.583449
FKP 0.86269
GBP 0.862499
GEL 3.015381
GGP 0.86269
GHS 12.857451
GIP 0.86269
GMD 83.222763
GNF 9991.401736
GTQ 8.699608
GYD 238.651244
HKD 8.940488
HNL 30.510119
HRK 7.535342
HTG 149.03616
HUF 354.147428
IDR 20362.5295
ILS 3.418629
IMP 0.86269
INR 107.599675
IQD 1493.761052
IRR 1567615.623977
ISK 143.998889
JEP 0.86269
JMD 179.591272
JOD 0.808274
JPY 184.289059
KES 147.646835
KGS 99.696357
KHR 4577.267802
KMF 494.7783
KPW 1026.03877
KRW 1752.35789
KWD 0.35298
KYD 0.95029
KZT 553.271497
LAK 25028.996263
LBP 102117.195723
LKR 383.315495
LRD 207.715883
LSL 18.744002
LTL 3.366249
LVL 0.689601
LYD 7.319797
MAD 10.692496
MDL 20.218652
MGA 4823.143858
MKD 61.655153
MMK 2393.462693
MNT 4081.628965
MOP 9.21159
MRU 45.50872
MUR 54.39115
MVR 17.613684
MWK 1977.361744
MXN 19.968844
MYR 4.661976
MZN 72.849226
NAD 18.744002
NGN 1572.118647
NIO 41.963287
NOK 11.298147
NPR 171.247607
NZD 2.018041
OMR 0.438339
PAB 1.140368
PEN 3.888378
PGK 5.004156
PHP 69.892026
PKR 317.357353
PLN 4.286982
PYG 6959.856149
QAR 4.156517
RON 5.241007
RSD 117.374218
RUB 88.643027
RWF 1670.006102
SAR 4.282215
SBD 9.179569
SCR 16.010093
SDG 684.025293
SEK 11.076665
SGD 1.475445
SHP 0.851157
SLE 28.272923
SLL 23906.128197
SOS 651.724331
SRD 42.546623
STD 23596.580793
STN 24.496082
SVC 9.97736
SYP 126.011304
SZL 18.733003
THB 38.047216
TJS 10.553828
TMT 3.990149
TND 3.379908
TOP 2.74495
TRY 53.154875
TTD 7.749624
TWD 36.346152
TZS 2989.981828
UAH 51.183064
UGX 4185.220382
USD 1.140043
UYU 45.774685
UZS 13697.40965
VES 707.684868
VND 29983.121282
VUV 136.749145
WST 3.175585
XAF 655.852087
XAG 0.019615
XAU 0.000282
XCD 3.081022
XCG 2.055071
XDR 0.816787
XOF 655.849211
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.042682
ZAR 18.768497
ZMK 10261.75068
ZMW 20.541075
ZWL 367.093263
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    61.3

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0190

    22.046

    -0.09%

  • BCC

    2.1000

    79.76

    +2.63%

  • GSK

    0.8000

    51.89

    +1.54%

  • RIO

    1.0800

    95.11

    +1.14%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    21.93

    -0.41%

  • BTI

    1.0900

    62.48

    +1.74%

  • BP

    -0.1400

    37.72

    -0.37%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.2

    0%

  • NGG

    0.5900

    83.42

    +0.71%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    12.58

    +0.08%

  • RYCEF

    0.7000

    18.7

    +3.74%

  • AZN

    2.6600

    185.68

    +1.43%

  • RELX

    -0.2300

    30.92

    -0.74%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    13.86

    +0.36%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.