Berliner Boersenzeitung - Ukraine Loses Kursk: A Collapse?

EUR -
AED 4.293369
AFN 80.921207
ALL 97.703162
AMD 448.88481
ANG 2.091988
AOA 1071.885594
ARS 1473.704122
AUD 1.780564
AWG 2.106951
AZN 1.986555
BAM 1.954846
BBD 2.360148
BDT 141.440985
BGN 1.954359
BHD 0.440694
BIF 3482.930323
BMD 1.168905
BND 1.497082
BOB 8.106114
BRL 6.501093
BSD 1.16893
BTN 100.432854
BWP 15.596523
BYN 3.825466
BYR 22910.530954
BZD 2.348074
CAD 1.598331
CDF 3373.45872
CHF 0.930699
CLF 0.029174
CLP 1119.518507
CNY 8.379351
CNH 8.37969
COP 4676.565375
CRC 590.017153
CUC 1.168905
CUP 30.975973
CVE 110.210281
CZK 24.647292
DJF 208.16021
DKK 7.462942
DOP 70.425636
DZD 151.734361
EGP 57.815078
ERN 17.53357
ETB 160.050374
FJD 2.623836
FKP 0.863884
GBP 0.866895
GEL 3.167331
GGP 0.863884
GHS 12.157172
GIP 0.863884
GMD 83.5664
GNF 10141.051739
GTQ 8.979618
GYD 244.462807
HKD 9.175866
HNL 30.57808
HRK 7.534291
HTG 153.425137
HUF 400.174372
IDR 19023.806134
ILS 3.929577
IMP 0.863884
INR 100.515688
IQD 1531.252835
IRR 49225.476901
ISK 142.384771
JEP 0.863884
JMD 187.267022
JOD 0.828789
JPY 172.271411
KES 151.025016
KGS 102.216738
KHR 4684.754182
KMF 492.283989
KPW 1052.014529
KRW 1613.847966
KWD 0.357077
KYD 0.974133
KZT 613.38595
LAK 25193.922322
LBP 104735.890813
LKR 351.698391
LRD 234.367647
LSL 20.880012
LTL 3.451472
LVL 0.707059
LYD 6.336854
MAD 10.517768
MDL 19.801507
MGA 5177.517957
MKD 61.510247
MMK 2454.699057
MNT 4189.593513
MOP 9.451469
MRU 46.404357
MUR 53.080425
MVR 17.998348
MWK 2026.928314
MXN 21.839954
MYR 4.97077
MZN 74.763656
NAD 20.880012
NGN 1790.002716
NIO 43.019009
NOK 11.802693
NPR 160.692966
NZD 1.951736
OMR 0.449432
PAB 1.16894
PEN 4.154973
PGK 4.834641
PHP 66.21318
PKR 332.70306
PLN 4.258954
PYG 9055.581387
QAR 4.261521
RON 5.078774
RSD 117.144154
RUB 91.347987
RWF 1689.090269
SAR 4.383936
SBD 9.732869
SCR 17.157885
SDG 701.930858
SEK 11.204297
SGD 1.497145
SHP 0.918576
SLE 26.281374
SLL 24511.350472
SOS 668.07973
SRD 43.492023
STD 24193.966049
SVC 10.228009
SYP 15198.080866
SZL 20.875814
THB 37.88829
TJS 11.28599
TMT 4.102855
TND 3.424829
TOP 2.737692
TRY 47.015729
TTD 7.934196
TWD 34.289813
TZS 3029.627848
UAH 48.883729
UGX 4188.956026
USD 1.168905
UYU 47.506819
UZS 14745.804879
VES 133.569003
VND 30537.633733
VUV 139.856123
WST 3.04559
XAF 655.642692
XAG 0.029998
XAU 0.000348
XCD 3.159023
XDR 0.81535
XOF 655.637086
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.699597
ZAR 20.89451
ZMK 10521.545191
ZMW 27.118999
ZWL 376.386817
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Ukraine Loses Kursk: A Collapse?




Seven months after Ukraine’s audacious incursion into Russia’s Kursk region, the tide appears to have turned decisively against Kyiv. Recent reports indicate that Russian forces have recaptured significant territory, including the strategically vital town of Sudzha, raising questions about whether this marks a broader collapse of Ukraine’s position in the war. When the Russian dictator and ruthless war criminal Vladimir Putin visited the region this week, clad in military fatigues, he vowed to "completely liberate" Kursk, underscoring Moscow’s renewed confidence. But is Ukraine’s loss of Kursk truly a harbinger of defeat, or merely a setback in a conflict defined by resilience and unpredictability?

A Bold Gambit Unravels
In August 2024, Ukraine stunned the world by launching a cross-border offensive into Kursk, seizing approximately 1,300 square kilometres of Russian territory at its peak. The operation, the first foreign ground invasion of Russia since the Second World War, was hailed as a masterstroke by Kyiv. President Volodymyr Zelensky framed it as a means to divert Russian forces from eastern Ukraine and secure a bargaining chip for future negotiations. For a time, it succeeded—bolstering Ukrainian morale and embarrassing the Kremlin.

Yet, the initial triumph has given way to a grim reality. Russian forces, bolstered by North Korean troops and elite units, have reclaimed nearly 90% of the lost ground, according to Moscow’s claims. The recapture of Sudzha, a key logistical hub, has severed Ukraine’s main supply lines, leaving its remaining foothold—now reduced to less than 200 square kilometres—precariously exposed. Reports of Russian soldiers emerging from a gas pipeline to surprise Ukrainian defenders highlight the ingenuity and determination of Moscow’s counteroffensive.

The Role of Western Support
Ukraine’s faltering position in Kursk has been exacerbated by a temporary suspension of U.S. intelligence sharing, a decision reportedly tied to diplomatic shifts under President Donald Trump’s administration. Ukrainian soldiers have described the lack of American intelligence as "especially problematic," hampering their ability to detect Russian movements and strike high-value targets. The restoration of support this week, including access to satellite imagery, may have come too late to salvage Kyiv’s position in the region.

Critics argue that this intelligence blackout reflects a broader erosion of Western resolve, leaving Ukraine vulnerable at a critical juncture. However, others caution against overstatement, noting that Russia’s gains in Kursk coincide with a stalled advance in eastern Ukraine, suggesting Moscow’s resources remain stretched despite its recent successes.

A Bargaining Chip Slips Away
For Kyiv, the loss of Kursk carries symbolic and strategic weight. Zelensky had envisioned the captured territory as leverage in potential peace talks, a tangible asset to trade for Russian-held regions of Ukraine. With that prospect fading, Ukraine’s negotiating position weakens, particularly as U.S. officials prepare to discuss a 30-day ceasefire proposal with Moscow. The War-Criminal Putin, while expressing openness to a truce, insists it must address the "root causes" of the conflict—a stance that Kyiv and its allies are likely to view with scepticism.

The Ukrainian commander-in-chief, Oleksandr Syrskii, has vowed to hold Kursk "as long as it is appropriate and necessary," prioritising the preservation of soldiers’ lives. Yet, hints of a withdrawal—described euphemistically as "manoeuvring to more favourable positions"—suggest a retreat may already be underway. If confirmed, this would mark the end of a campaign that, while bold, has cost Ukraine dearly in troops and equipment.

Collapse or Strategic Recalibration?
Does the loss of Kursk signal Ukraine’s collapse? Not necessarily. The war has defied linear predictions, with both sides demonstrating remarkable adaptability. Ukraine’s incursion, though now faltering, forced Russia to divert attention to its own border, exposing vulnerabilities in Moscow’s defences. Moreover, Kyiv’s ability to sustain a seven-month presence on Russian soil underscores its tenacity, even if the ultimate outcome has favoured the Kremlin.

Nevertheless, the setback is undeniable. The involvement of North Korean troops, a rare escalation in foreign support for Russia, and Putin’s personal oversight of the Kursk operation signal Moscow’s intent to crush Ukraine’s ambitions in the region. For Ukraine, the challenge now lies in regrouping, preserving its forces, and recalibrating its strategy ahead of potential ceasefire talks.

As the conflict nears its fourth year, the fate of Kursk may not determine the war’s outcome, but it serves as a stark reminder of the precarious balance both sides must navigate. Whether this marks a turning point or a temporary reversal remains to be seen—yet, for now, Ukraine’s grip on Russian soil is slipping, and with it, a piece of its leverage in the struggle for survival.