Berliner Boersenzeitung - Next Generation EU a scam?

EUR -
AED 4.325007
AFN 82.242498
ALL 97.861399
AMD 452.456982
ANG 2.107236
AOA 1079.744921
ARS 1461.909869
AUD 1.797604
AWG 2.122399
AZN 2.006382
BAM 1.954671
BBD 2.376677
BDT 144.396598
BGN 1.955486
BHD 0.443838
BIF 3506.77453
BMD 1.177475
BND 1.499102
BOB 8.134129
BRL 6.381095
BSD 1.177095
BTN 100.459829
BWP 15.590995
BYN 3.852093
BYR 23078.508139
BZD 2.364434
CAD 1.602537
CDF 3397.015527
CHF 0.934174
CLF 0.028542
CLP 1095.275848
CNY 8.437084
CNH 8.437609
COP 4709.946719
CRC 594.444035
CUC 1.177475
CUP 31.203085
CVE 110.201349
CZK 24.649307
DJF 209.261303
DKK 7.462017
DOP 70.447814
DZD 152.345163
EGP 58.120021
ERN 17.662124
ETB 163.360876
FJD 2.63725
FKP 0.862468
GBP 0.862742
GEL 3.203192
GGP 0.862468
GHS 12.182705
GIP 0.862468
GMD 84.19399
GNF 10209.103348
GTQ 9.05058
GYD 246.269849
HKD 9.242978
HNL 30.754237
HRK 7.533842
HTG 154.547454
HUF 398.545235
IDR 19066.851138
ILS 3.939761
IMP 0.862468
INR 100.67593
IQD 1541.976634
IRR 49601.130791
ISK 142.404269
JEP 0.862468
JMD 187.881482
JOD 0.834876
JPY 170.14454
KES 152.083112
KGS 102.970633
KHR 4729.268433
KMF 492.184923
KPW 1059.684191
KRW 1604.7339
KWD 0.359472
KYD 0.981033
KZT 611.295774
LAK 25364.811057
LBP 105466.644517
LKR 353.166016
LRD 236.008673
LSL 20.705941
LTL 3.476778
LVL 0.712243
LYD 6.340338
MAD 10.565398
MDL 19.828127
MGA 5296.828156
MKD 61.513502
MMK 2472.287743
MNT 4225.230904
MOP 9.517503
MRU 46.719016
MUR 52.927943
MVR 18.137516
MWK 2041.238342
MXN 21.94042
MYR 4.970167
MZN 75.311739
NAD 20.705501
NGN 1801.4664
NIO 43.314982
NOK 11.864285
NPR 160.730751
NZD 1.9446
OMR 0.452721
PAB 1.17712
PEN 4.173989
PGK 4.862192
PHP 66.473762
PKR 334.151398
PLN 4.24229
PYG 9380.382844
QAR 4.302215
RON 5.057495
RSD 117.165863
RUB 92.73008
RWF 1692.122651
SAR 4.415637
SBD 9.816519
SCR 16.618563
SDG 707.078009
SEK 11.259445
SGD 1.500461
SHP 0.92531
SLE 26.434748
SLL 24691.064337
SOS 672.697176
SRD 44.019944
STD 24371.353222
SVC 10.300051
SYP 15309.563345
SZL 20.688996
THB 38.138847
TJS 11.447388
TMT 4.132937
TND 3.429546
TOP 2.757769
TRY 46.973129
TTD 7.983219
TWD 34.059055
TZS 3116.429941
UAH 49.091645
UGX 4222.471502
USD 1.177475
UYU 47.242713
UZS 14781.46241
VES 128.902304
VND 30813.929528
VUV 140.274476
WST 3.063467
XAF 655.578346
XAG 0.031771
XAU 0.000353
XCD 3.182185
XDR 0.815468
XOF 655.578346
XPF 119.331742
YER 285.125976
ZAR 20.743081
ZMK 10598.691339
ZMW 28.514925
ZWL 379.146439
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Next Generation EU a scam?




The Next Generation EU (NGEU) fund, an unprecedented European Union economic recovery package, was launched in 2020 to help member states recover from the economic and social impact of the COVID 19 pandemic. With a volume of €750 billion, divided into grants and loans, NGEU aims to make Europe greener, more digital and more resilient (European Commission, Recovery plan for Europe). However, the implementation and effectiveness of the programme have been met with controversy and criticism, leading some to call it the EU's ‘biggest scam’. This report analyses the reasons for this criticism, based on fraud cases, political tensions and economic doubts.

Fraud and misuse of funds
A key point of criticism is the high number of fraud cases affecting the programme. In April 2024, 22 people were arrested in Italy, Austria, Romania and Slovakia on charges of embezzling €600 million from the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), which is part of NGEU. The criminals used a network of accountants, service providers and notaries to fraudulently obtain non-repayable funds and transfer the money abroad.

Another case concerns the procurement of power generators for Ukraine, which was managed by the Polish government agency for strategic reserves (RARS). The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) recommended the recovery of over €91 million due to serious irregularities, including inflated prices and a lack of competition (European Commission, OLAF completes investigation into suspected serious irregularities). These cases are not isolated: in 2022, OLAF recorded a 7% increase in fraud cases, with irregularities worth €1.77 billion. At the end of 2024, the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) was handling 311 active cases with an estimated €2.8 billion in damages to the EU budget, mostly related to NGEU (Balkan Insight, EU Fraud Keeps Rising as Prosecutors Investigate 38% More Cases in 2024).

Political controversies and delays
Besides the fraud cases, there were political tensions that delayed the implementation of NGEU. Poland and Hungary initially blocked the adoption of the fund due to concerns about the rule of law conditions. This led to delays in the disbursement of funds and political tensions within the EU (Wikipedia, Next Generation EU). Article 7 proceedings were opened against both countries, but their mutual support prevented sanctions, complicating the implementation of the fund (Wikipedia, Next Generation EU). These controversies show that NGEU was not only a technical financial instrument but also a political battleground, undermining confidence in the programme.

Scepticism from economists and political actors
Some economists and political actors express scepticism about the effectiveness and purpose of NGEU. A study from Comparative European Politics (2022) argues that the allocation of funds was based on existing economic and political vulnerabilities rather than the direct consequences of the pandemic. Countries with strong Euroscepticism and structural problems received the most funding per capita, regardless of the severity of the health crisis (Comparative European Politics, Voices from the past: economic and political vulnerabilities in the making of next generation EU). This could indicate that NGEU is more of a tool for stabilising weak economies, which some may see as a misuse of funds.

In Italy, the main recipient, there are doubts about the government's ability to use the funds efficiently. Although the government is celebrating the receipt of the fifth tranche of NGEU, the challenge remains of actually spending the funds and implementing the planned projects (Euractiv, Italy and the challenge of spending European funds). These difficulties underline the concern that NGEU may not deliver the promised results.