Berliner Boersenzeitung - A World Cup on three continents sparks climate concerns

EUR -
AED 4.100273
AFN 78.60757
ALL 98.166966
AMD 432.286638
ANG 1.997847
AOA 1023.661719
ARS 1274.492205
AUD 1.739351
AWG 2.012159
AZN 1.902168
BAM 1.95574
BBD 2.26123
BDT 136.075794
BGN 1.958829
BHD 0.422187
BIF 3332.496993
BMD 1.116315
BND 1.454255
BOB 7.738761
BRL 6.322034
BSD 1.119965
BTN 95.745041
BWP 15.144532
BYN 3.665087
BYR 21879.783696
BZD 2.24963
CAD 1.559549
CDF 3204.942189
CHF 0.935299
CLF 0.027413
CLP 1051.967484
CNY 8.048081
CNH 8.048713
COP 4704.554582
CRC 567.282465
CUC 1.116315
CUP 29.582361
CVE 110.261592
CZK 24.899757
DJF 199.433835
DKK 7.461011
DOP 65.907963
DZD 148.865399
EGP 55.928271
ERN 16.744732
ETB 151.194627
FJD 2.537725
FKP 0.842071
GBP 0.840567
GEL 3.05914
GGP 0.842071
GHS 13.887571
GIP 0.842071
GMD 80.937172
GNF 9698.700213
GTQ 8.598734
GYD 234.312757
HKD 8.722499
HNL 29.141099
HRK 7.532941
HTG 146.54547
HUF 402.867531
IDR 18412.786848
ILS 3.96752
IMP 0.842071
INR 95.543378
IQD 1467.15465
IRR 47010.84053
ISK 145.891703
JEP 0.842071
JMD 178.534481
JOD 0.791807
JPY 162.594147
KES 144.755526
KGS 97.622219
KHR 4481.861466
KMF 492.857526
KPW 1004.660245
KRW 1561.859763
KWD 0.343145
KYD 0.933371
KZT 571.02235
LAK 24221.251321
LBP 100346.698283
LKR 335.109642
LRD 223.983077
LSL 20.217275
LTL 3.29619
LVL 0.675249
LYD 6.178809
MAD 10.389879
MDL 19.509397
MGA 5019.844837
MKD 61.528098
MMK 2343.870677
MNT 4001.744803
MOP 9.015121
MRU 44.32763
MUR 51.47373
MVR 17.25866
MWK 1941.939975
MXN 21.73009
MYR 4.795735
MZN 71.336723
NAD 20.217275
NGN 1788.71739
NIO 41.208726
NOK 11.593835
NPR 153.192265
NZD 1.897963
OMR 0.429497
PAB 1.119965
PEN 4.129072
PGK 4.654856
PHP 62.294316
PKR 315.375252
PLN 4.268489
PYG 8941.723611
QAR 4.081974
RON 5.106255
RSD 117.226377
RUB 90.497203
RWF 1603.750428
SAR 4.186446
SBD 9.31055
SCR 15.922308
SDG 670.351558
SEK 10.907859
SGD 1.452108
SHP 0.877249
SLE 25.344455
SLL 23408.578004
SOS 640.080215
SRD 40.8365
STD 23105.476908
SVC 9.799697
SYP 14514.229131
SZL 20.222375
THB 37.223582
TJS 11.546543
TMT 3.912686
TND 3.376696
TOP 2.614527
TRY 43.377235
TTD 7.596765
TWD 33.732379
TZS 3021.006621
UAH 46.488763
UGX 4097.873335
USD 1.116315
UYU 46.59856
UZS 14520.55117
VES 105.163869
VND 28936.572095
VUV 135.253884
WST 3.10171
XAF 655.936725
XAG 0.034565
XAU 0.000349
XCD 3.016899
XDR 0.815775
XOF 655.936725
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.496621
ZAR 20.143411
ZMK 10048.183034
ZMW 30.104069
ZWL 359.453134
  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.05

    -0.23%

  • SCS

    0.0000

    10.5

    0%

  • VOD

    0.1800

    9.45

    +1.9%

  • GSK

    0.4991

    37.64

    +1.33%

  • AZN

    0.8500

    68.81

    +1.24%

  • RBGPF

    64.5000

    64.5

    +100%

  • NGG

    1.2500

    71.28

    +1.75%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    10.72

    +0.19%

  • BTI

    1.2700

    42.64

    +2.98%

  • RIO

    -0.1100

    62.64

    -0.18%

  • CMSD

    0.0472

    22.06

    +0.21%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.9

    +1.24%

  • BCC

    0.9200

    91.91

    +1%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.56

    -0.32%

  • RELX

    0.5300

    54.57

    +0.97%

  • BP

    0.1300

    29.76

    +0.44%

A World Cup on three continents sparks climate concerns
A World Cup on three continents sparks climate concerns / Photo: GABRIEL BOUYS - AFP/File

A World Cup on three continents sparks climate concerns

The 2030 FIFA World Cup will send dozens of football teams and hordes of fans crisscrossing the globe for matches on three continents, sparking alarm over the environmental cost.

Text size:

An announcement on the 2030 and 2034 World Cups will be made on Wednesday, with expectations of a dramatic expansion of geographic footprint -- and with that planet-heating greenhouse gas emissions.

While Saudi Arabia is the lone candidate for 2034, Morocco, Spain and Portugal have formed a joint bid for the 2030 tournament, with Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay each also set to host a match.

Guillaume Gouze, of the Centre of Sports Law and Economics at the University of Limoges, said FIFA has a "moral responsibility" to integrate climate concerns into its tournament plans.

Instead, he said, it had proposed World Cups that are an "ecological aberration".

- 'Crazy idea' -

Benja Faecks of the NGO Carbon Market Watch, which evaluates climate promises of major events, told AFP that in general attempts at greenwashing in sport -- or "sportswashing" -- are harder than they used to be, with academics and campaigners holding organisations to account.

But she said that the 2030 tournament was "an unfortunate geographic choice".

When an event is spread over sites thousands of kilometres apart, teams and potentially hundreds of thousands of their loyal fans have to travel by plane.

The three matches in Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay are to mark the 100th anniversary of the event, which was born in Montevideo.

FIFA is keen to support access to football across different parts of the world, said David Gogishvili, a researcher at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland.

But "it is a crazy idea in terms of the impact this choice will have on the planet", he added.

FIFA has already expanded participation in the competition, which will see 48 teams take part in the 2026 edition -- held in Mexico, the United States and Canada -- compared to 32 in 2022.

This "is almost worse than the Cup on three continents," says Aurelien Francois, who teaches sports management at the University of Rouen in France.

More teams means more fans wanting to visit the venues, more capacity needed in the hotel and catering sector, and more waste, among other issues.

FIFA says that, with the exception of the games in Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay "for 101 games, the tournament will be played in a footprint of neighbouring countries in close geographic proximity and with extensive and well developed transport links and infrastructure".

Meanwhile, oil and gas giant Saudi Aramco became a major sponsor earlier this year in a controversial deal that runs through to 2027.

In October, an open letter from more than a hundred female professional footballers across 24 countries called for the deal to be cancelled on the grounds of human rights and environmental concerns, saying: "FIFA might as well pour oil on the pitch and set it alight".

- Fan zones -

Just shrinking the geographic footprint is not enough, researchers said.

While the 2022 World Cup was held in a "compact" site in Qatar, it was necessary to build new air-conditioned stadiums that were rarely reused.

Potential improvements could include a policy of not awarding the World Cup to a city where everything has yet to be built, echoing a rule by the International Olympic Committee, said Gogishvili.

Another idea to reduce air travel is to reserve a large proportion of stadium tickets for fans travelling from within a few hundred kilometres, and encourage transport by train.

Gouze, like other experts interviewed by AFP, supports creating more fan zones in soccer-loving cities for "a collective experience" that recreates the stadium atmosphere in front of a big screen.

But this would need FIFA to accept the impact on the economic profitability of the World Cup.

Soccer fans are a reflection of the population as a whole, so a growing percentage are more environmentally conscious than even a few years ago, said Ronan Evain of Hamburg-based Football Supporters Europe.

He said that while co-hosting is not a problem in and of itself, citing the example of the 2002 Cup co-hosted by Japan and South Korea, the 2030 tournament poses "too many questions" for fans.

These include the environmental costs, as well as financial considerations for fans trying to follow their teams across the planet.

But die-hard supporters will not let the long-haul flight put them off, said Antoine Miche, director of Football Ecologie France.

"Passion can make you do things that don't make sense," he added.

(Y.Berger--BBZ)