Berliner Boersenzeitung - US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

EUR -
AED 3.931539
AFN 75.621895
ALL 100.232512
AMD 414.610392
ANG 1.925048
AOA 914.641261
ARS 967.444549
AUD 1.602121
AWG 1.926678
AZN 1.82389
BAM 1.955849
BBD 2.156654
BDT 125.503146
BGN 1.95818
BHD 0.40301
BIF 3071.376984
BMD 1.070377
BND 1.447136
BOB 7.380185
BRL 5.814398
BSD 1.068127
BTN 89.193736
BWP 14.395361
BYN 3.495488
BYR 20979.385849
BZD 2.152954
CAD 1.466363
CDF 3050.57435
CHF 0.95639
CLF 0.036076
CLP 995.457951
CNY 7.772332
CNH 7.803519
COP 4456.311698
CRC 558.313994
CUC 1.070377
CUP 28.364986
CVE 110.267764
CZK 24.956054
DJF 190.174767
DKK 7.465241
DOP 63.04158
DZD 143.800604
EGP 51.014279
ERN 16.055652
ETB 61.631245
FJD 2.400588
FKP 0.83982
GBP 0.845914
GEL 3.00245
GGP 0.83982
GHS 16.182406
GIP 0.83982
GMD 72.518447
GNF 9195.230479
GTQ 8.288208
GYD 223.335598
HKD 8.354452
HNL 26.420662
HRK 7.512373
HTG 141.573549
HUF 396.821217
IDR 17637.187719
ILS 4.024193
IMP 0.83982
INR 89.443846
IQD 1399.235072
IRR 45049.488876
ISK 149.214612
JEP 0.83982
JMD 166.344169
JOD 0.75858
JPY 171.0195
KES 138.323467
KGS 92.864507
KHR 4403.110364
KMF 492.962459
KPW 963.339286
KRW 1487.171273
KWD 0.328339
KYD 0.890122
KZT 497.142461
LAK 23479.588516
LBP 95649.597459
LKR 326.158175
LRD 207.325197
LSL 19.119879
LTL 3.160545
LVL 0.647461
LYD 5.17813
MAD 10.637567
MDL 19.119479
MGA 4836.121217
MKD 61.536542
MMK 3476.542188
MNT 3692.800165
MOP 8.584815
MRU 42.062054
MUR 50.136856
MVR 16.487805
MWK 1851.946419
MXN 19.385385
MYR 5.044728
MZN 68.177694
NAD 19.119879
NGN 1592.72109
NIO 39.320986
NOK 11.318438
NPR 142.709577
NZD 1.749411
OMR 0.41161
PAB 1.068127
PEN 4.064802
PGK 4.166104
PHP 63.013485
PKR 297.469856
PLN 4.328741
PYG 8040.201528
QAR 3.895698
RON 4.979932
RSD 117.058434
RUB 94.352365
RWF 1402.435152
SAR 4.017427
SBD 9.049442
SCR 15.71353
SDG 643.296837
SEK 11.246989
SGD 1.450579
SHP 1.352367
SLE 24.455224
SLL 22445.268968
SOS 610.4153
SRD 32.964436
STD 22154.639278
SVC 9.346234
SYP 2689.35435
SZL 19.111479
THB 39.288222
TJS 11.354085
TMT 3.757023
TND 3.349284
TOP 2.525822
TRY 35.140865
TTD 7.248182
TWD 34.653076
TZS 2803.770277
UAH 43.202683
UGX 4005.100388
USD 1.070377
UYU 42.071055
UZS 13500.338386
VEF 3877496.294765
VES 38.884603
VND 27246.442183
VUV 127.077251
WST 2.997713
XAF 655.973442
XAG 0.036234
XAU 0.000461
XCD 2.892747
XDR 0.81062
XOF 655.973442
XPF 119.331742
YER 267.969228
ZAR 19.228207
ZMK 9634.679752
ZMW 27.210682
ZWL 344.660902
  • RIO

    -0.5200

    66.4

    -0.78%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    56.5

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0107

    24.44

    -0.04%

  • NGG

    -0.7200

    57.13

    -1.26%

  • BTI

    0.2000

    31.7

    +0.63%

  • RELX

    -0.0500

    45.6

    -0.11%

  • GSK

    -0.2800

    40.48

    -0.69%

  • AZN

    0.3200

    78.88

    +0.41%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    24.17

    -0.29%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    9.05

    -0.44%

  • SCS

    1.1100

    13.29

    +8.35%

  • BCC

    -0.3100

    122.41

    -0.25%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1000

    6.03

    -1.66%

  • BP

    -0.2000

    35.51

    -0.56%

  • BCE

    -0.1900

    32.6

    -0.58%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12

    -0.25%

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning
US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

A divided US Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday in an environmental regulation case with potentially far-reaching implications for the Biden administration's fight against climate change.

Text size:

The case concerns the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants, which produce nearly 20 percent of the electricity in the United States.

As the Supreme Court was hearing arguments, the United Nations issued a landmark report containing dire warnings over climate change.

While the three liberal justices on the nine-member Supreme Court appeared largely to support arguments that the EPA was operating within its brief, several of the conservative justices appeared skeptical.

"This agency is doing greenhouse gas regulation," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the liberal members of the court. "This is in, you know, exactly in its wheelhouse."

Jacob Roth, arguing for The North America Coal Corp., said the EPA is going beyond its remit.

"The agency is asking questions like: Should we phase out the coal industry? Should we build more solar farms in this country? Should we restrict how consumers use electricity in order to bring down emissions?

"Those are not the types of questions we expect the agency to be answering," Roth said.

In 2007, the Supreme Court, by a narrow majority, ruled that the EPA has the power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act of 1970.

In 2015, Democratic president Barack Obama unveiled his Clean Power Plan, which was intended to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal- and gas-burning plants and shifting energy production to clean sources such as solar and wind power.

The Clean Power Plan was blocked in the Supreme Court in 2016 and repealed by former Republican president Donald Trump, who replaced it with his own industry-friendly Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule.

Trump, a climate change skeptic hostile to government regulation of industry, also nominated three justices to the Supreme Court, giving conservatives a 6-3 majority.

- 'Constrain EPA authority' -

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out Trump's ACE rule on the last day of his presidency, setting the stage for the case currently before the Supreme Court: West Virginia vs EPA.

West Virginia and several other coal-producing states asked the Supreme Court to intervene and define the powers of the EPA. The case has also been embraced by opponents of strong government regulatory authority.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing before the court for the Biden administration, said the justices should just wait until the EPA publishes its new rules.

"The DC Circuit's judgment leaves no EPA rule in effect," Prelogar said. "No federal regulation will occur until EPA completes its upcoming rulemaking.

"Petitioners aren't harmed by the status quo," she said. "Instead, what they seek from this court is a decision to constrain EPA authority in the upcoming rulemaking."

In its brief to the court, West Virginia accused the EPA of acting like "the country's central energy planning authority."

Justice Samuel Alito, one of the more conservative members of the court, questioned how far the EPA could go in regulating emissions.

"Is there any reason EPA couldn't force the adoption of a system for single family homes that is similar to what it has done, what it is claiming it can do, with respect to existing power plants?" Alito asked.

Prelogar, the solicitor general, replied that the EPA "has never listed homes as a source category and couldn't do so because they are far too diverse and differentiated."

UN experts, in the report issued Monday on the global impacts of climate change, said humanity is perilously close to missing its chance to secure a "liveable" future.

"The cumulative scientific evidence is unequivocal: Climate change is a threat to human wellbeing and planetary health," the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said.

Any further delay in global action to cut carbon pollution and prepare for impacts already in the pipeline "will miss a brief and rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future for all," the 195-nation IPCC warned.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision in West Virginia vs EPA before June.

(H.Schneide--BBZ)