Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 4.241592
AFN 81.423885
ALL 98.516529
AMD 443.227685
ANG 2.066945
AOA 1059.099499
ARS 1365.453259
AUD 1.774881
AWG 2.081818
AZN 1.962778
BAM 1.950525
BBD 2.330876
BDT 141.193019
BGN 1.953619
BHD 0.435454
BIF 3397.896114
BMD 1.154961
BND 1.478015
BOB 7.994447
BRL 6.342005
BSD 1.154368
BTN 99.278351
BWP 15.413446
BYN 3.777949
BYR 22637.241279
BZD 2.318849
CAD 1.568403
CDF 3322.823623
CHF 0.940052
CLF 0.02818
CLP 1081.392079
CNY 8.292333
CNH 8.296509
COP 4735.918769
CRC 581.921097
CUC 1.154961
CUP 30.606474
CVE 110.443201
CZK 24.829377
DJF 205.259894
DKK 7.458389
DOP 68.431389
DZD 149.906855
EGP 58.054362
ERN 17.324419
ETB 155.107264
FJD 2.591962
FKP 0.850379
GBP 0.851686
GEL 3.147267
GGP 0.850379
GHS 11.867226
GIP 0.850379
GMD 82.578525
GNF 9997.344523
GTQ 8.871928
GYD 241.518879
HKD 9.06598
HNL 30.202065
HRK 7.532311
HTG 151.070108
HUF 402.282837
IDR 18831.066349
ILS 4.026559
IMP 0.850379
INR 99.447538
IQD 1512.99929
IRR 48635.420086
ISK 143.596755
JEP 0.850379
JMD 184.256446
JOD 0.818885
JPY 167.242438
KES 149.565924
KGS 101.001641
KHR 4642.944223
KMF 491.418446
KPW 1039.465161
KRW 1573.091852
KWD 0.353499
KYD 0.962006
KZT 591.993767
LAK 25036.674661
LBP 103484.531159
LKR 347.586906
LRD 230.588167
LSL 20.581435
LTL 3.4103
LVL 0.698624
LYD 6.265696
MAD 10.536132
MDL 19.74078
MGA 5122.253247
MKD 61.490196
MMK 2425.312208
MNT 4136.202706
MOP 9.334136
MRU 45.817115
MUR 52.282238
MVR 17.792172
MWK 2005.012449
MXN 21.866185
MYR 4.908674
MZN 73.860223
NAD 20.580712
NGN 1782.093233
NIO 41.921937
NOK 11.452371
NPR 158.845761
NZD 1.909617
OMR 0.444081
PAB 1.154388
PEN 4.16135
PGK 4.760633
PHP 65.199911
PKR 326.967447
PLN 4.272662
PYG 9209.013552
QAR 4.204638
RON 5.020851
RSD 117.221608
RUB 90.798608
RWF 1645.819838
SAR 4.333248
SBD 9.640913
SCR 16.949103
SDG 693.578739
SEK 10.967749
SGD 1.480349
SHP 0.907618
SLE 25.669035
SLL 24218.964998
SOS 660.063294
SRD 44.744372
STD 23905.36684
SVC 10.101031
SYP 15016.695583
SZL 20.581058
THB 37.460066
TJS 11.694524
TMT 4.042365
TND 3.375373
TOP 2.70503
TRY 45.496934
TTD 7.836872
TWD 33.59724
TZS 2979.144046
UAH 47.997149
UGX 4161.74414
USD 1.154961
UYU 47.203967
UZS 14702.657469
VES 117.998904
VND 30100.023653
VUV 137.558748
WST 3.025061
XAF 654.193332
XAG 0.031851
XAU 0.00034
XCD 3.121341
XDR 0.816858
XOF 652.552943
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.598072
ZAR 20.598621
ZMK 10396.00982
ZMW 27.994528
ZWL 371.897064
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.