Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 4.208902
AFN 81.28964
ALL 97.356673
AMD 442.241094
ANG 2.051119
AOA 1050.990672
ARS 1334.634085
AUD 1.782477
AWG 2.063013
AZN 1.946924
BAM 1.944548
BBD 2.313414
BDT 140.129181
BGN 1.944548
BHD 0.431702
BIF 3412.156499
BMD 1.146118
BND 1.471983
BOB 7.917189
BRL 6.318662
BSD 1.14577
BTN 99.192053
BWP 15.442645
BYN 3.749703
BYR 22463.91874
BZD 2.301583
CAD 1.576887
CDF 3297.38185
CHF 0.937244
CLF 0.028107
CLP 1078.588554
CNY 8.238868
CNH 8.23847
COP 4679.224957
CRC 578.452942
CUC 1.146118
CUP 30.372135
CVE 109.630653
CZK 24.818615
DJF 204.039382
DKK 7.458342
DOP 67.946844
DZD 149.390593
EGP 58.345022
ERN 17.191775
ETB 157.560818
FJD 2.589597
FKP 0.851897
GBP 0.854999
GEL 3.117698
GGP 0.851897
GHS 11.801713
GIP 0.851897
GMD 81.9472
GNF 9927.556934
GTQ 8.806046
GYD 239.712967
HKD 8.996289
HNL 29.924848
HRK 7.494696
HTG 150.379868
HUF 403.170206
IDR 18840.236501
ILS 4.000727
IMP 0.851897
INR 99.231499
IQD 1501.014793
IRR 48280.233638
ISK 142.24482
JEP 0.851897
JMD 182.653128
JOD 0.812622
JPY 168.07246
KES 148.0931
KGS 100.227609
KHR 4592.427189
KMF 489.966738
KPW 1031.506472
KRW 1573.826773
KWD 0.351125
KYD 0.954875
KZT 598.745524
LAK 24719.964753
LBP 102662.173693
LKR 344.307758
LRD 229.154063
LSL 20.687299
LTL 3.384189
LVL 0.693275
LYD 6.24586
MAD 10.457789
MDL 19.702
MGA 5120.37238
MKD 61.176022
MMK 2406.509402
MNT 4106.554021
MOP 9.264195
MRU 45.291931
MUR 52.286001
MVR 17.655978
MWK 1986.803908
MXN 22.136362
MYR 4.873864
MZN 73.305348
NAD 20.687299
NGN 1776.609899
NIO 42.166018
NOK 11.605348
NPR 158.707682
NZD 1.926734
OMR 0.440153
PAB 1.14577
PEN 4.114493
PGK 4.790282
PHP 65.525804
PKR 325.115807
PLN 4.271355
PYG 9145.084495
QAR 4.17892
RON 5.00705
RSD 116.555583
RUB 90.309322
RWF 1654.526539
SAR 4.300463
SBD 9.559118
SCR 16.905605
SDG 688.241521
SEK 11.144046
SGD 1.477403
SHP 0.900669
SLE 25.73032
SLL 24033.531956
SOS 654.811116
SRD 44.526453
STD 23722.33487
SVC 10.025987
SYP 14901.658831
SZL 20.683322
THB 37.717572
TJS 11.314631
TMT 4.011414
TND 3.391774
TOP 2.684323
TRY 45.519997
TTD 7.786943
TWD 33.913415
TZS 3042.097742
UAH 48.021338
UGX 4130.102304
USD 1.146118
UYU 46.848922
UZS 14389.737758
VES 117.542105
VND 29946.352082
VUV 137.427642
WST 3.161694
XAF 652.183321
XAG 0.031836
XAU 0.00034
XCD 3.097442
XDR 0.811107
XOF 652.183321
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.160462
ZAR 20.786976
ZMK 10316.444119
ZMW 26.496684
ZWL 369.049626
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.