Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 4.293319
AFN 81.078958
ALL 97.892789
AMD 449.759881
ANG 2.091944
AOA 1071.862664
ARS 1494.93365
AUD 1.779936
AWG 2.104568
AZN 1.982472
BAM 1.958657
BBD 2.364749
BDT 141.716712
BGN 1.956115
BHD 0.440696
BIF 3489.690166
BMD 1.16888
BND 1.499988
BOB 8.121847
BRL 6.532631
BSD 1.171208
BTN 100.628641
BWP 15.626861
BYN 3.832891
BYR 22910.047276
BZD 2.352632
CAD 1.599735
CDF 3373.387589
CHF 0.929967
CLF 0.0295
CLP 1132.03718
CNY 8.377655
CNH 8.387175
COP 4687.793092
CRC 591.162287
CUC 1.16888
CUP 30.975319
CVE 110.427017
CZK 24.666884
DJF 208.564218
DKK 7.463358
DOP 70.562925
DZD 151.765062
EGP 57.81864
ERN 17.533199
ETB 160.361694
FJD 2.624373
FKP 0.870067
GBP 0.868993
GEL 3.167827
GGP 0.870067
GHS 12.180767
GIP 0.870067
GMD 83.569223
GNF 10160.820875
GTQ 8.997201
GYD 244.937273
HKD 9.175702
HNL 30.63782
HRK 7.534716
HTG 153.724227
HUF 400.469755
IDR 19016.391231
ILS 3.910418
IMP 0.870067
INR 100.317926
IQD 1534.237885
IRR 49224.46588
ISK 142.440119
JEP 0.870067
JMD 187.634492
JOD 0.828737
JPY 172.582208
KES 151.016602
KGS 102.214579
KHR 4693.846584
KMF 493.559356
KPW 1052.019569
KRW 1611.686562
KWD 0.357081
KYD 0.976024
KZT 614.576439
LAK 25242.819928
LBP 104939.167389
LKR 352.383998
LRD 234.824531
LSL 20.920716
LTL 3.451399
LVL 0.707044
LYD 6.349261
MAD 10.538271
MDL 19.839939
MGA 5187.588962
MKD 61.619881
MMK 2454.276962
MNT 4190.256195
MOP 9.469813
MRU 46.494819
MUR 53.113505
MVR 18.006727
MWK 2030.870976
MXN 21.837868
MYR 4.957806
MZN 74.761672
NAD 20.920716
NGN 1792.371697
NIO 43.102871
NOK 11.863085
NPR 161.004846
NZD 1.948994
OMR 0.449437
PAB 1.171208
PEN 4.163072
PGK 4.844107
PHP 66.281271
PKR 333.351637
PLN 4.255507
PYG 9073.23449
QAR 4.269865
RON 5.080535
RSD 117.168431
RUB 91.115398
RWF 1692.375789
SAR 4.383781
SBD 9.724567
SCR 17.158394
SDG 701.912242
SEK 11.240505
SGD 1.49688
SHP 0.918556
SLE 26.294993
SLL 24510.832999
SOS 669.37924
SRD 43.488759
STD 24193.455276
SVC 10.247948
SYP 15197.602188
SZL 20.916509
THB 37.88686
TJS 11.307991
TMT 4.102769
TND 3.431535
TOP 2.737634
TRY 47.018902
TTD 7.949596
TWD 34.224218
TZS 3053.697203
UAH 48.979653
UGX 4197.122047
USD 1.16888
UYU 47.599838
UZS 14774.550599
VES 133.467133
VND 30548.677835
VUV 139.684846
WST 3.207661
XAF 656.91801
XAG 0.030519
XAU 0.000347
XCD 3.158957
XDR 0.816995
XOF 656.915196
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.108705
ZAR 20.782645
ZMK 10521.243238
ZMW 27.171633
ZWL 376.378871
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.