Berliner Boersenzeitung - DOGE Fails to Slash U.S. Spending

EUR -
AED 4.302842
AFN 79.988996
ALL 97.295357
AMD 449.496115
ANG 2.096669
AOA 1074.270892
ARS 1542.554451
AUD 1.787174
AWG 2.108711
AZN 1.994775
BAM 1.956754
BBD 2.366783
BDT 142.429437
BGN 1.955484
BHD 0.441666
BIF 3495.634019
BMD 1.171506
BND 1.500387
BOB 8.100018
BRL 6.312102
BSD 1.172236
BTN 102.507849
BWP 15.644293
BYN 3.875974
BYR 22961.520127
BZD 2.354668
CAD 1.611565
CDF 3385.653172
CHF 0.941185
CLF 0.0285
CLP 1117.956903
CNY 8.410473
CNH 8.409516
COP 4709.185192
CRC 592.871322
CUC 1.171506
CUP 31.044912
CVE 110.318782
CZK 24.471603
DJF 208.737308
DKK 7.462652
DOP 71.624918
DZD 152.035978
EGP 56.618843
ERN 17.572592
ETB 164.179842
FJD 2.632081
FKP 0.867307
GBP 0.863031
GEL 3.157207
GGP 0.867307
GHS 12.349384
GIP 0.867307
GMD 84.934193
GNF 10164.890962
GTQ 8.991115
GYD 245.241139
HKD 9.196329
HNL 30.729982
HRK 7.533136
HTG 153.440218
HUF 395.465457
IDR 18898.206549
ILS 3.971312
IMP 0.867307
INR 102.419433
IQD 1535.648952
IRR 49349.695449
ISK 142.958836
JEP 0.867307
JMD 187.861586
JOD 0.830587
JPY 172.542059
KES 151.452048
KGS 102.331051
KHR 4694.359167
KMF 493.789581
KPW 1054.282337
KRW 1614.603432
KWD 0.357849
KYD 0.976856
KZT 630.82289
LAK 25378.277118
LBP 104933.967605
LKR 352.691963
LRD 235.02254
LSL 20.737801
LTL 3.459153
LVL 0.708632
LYD 6.369105
MAD 10.559348
MDL 19.570124
MGA 5169.590424
MKD 61.749588
MMK 2459.266979
MNT 4213.193023
MOP 9.477735
MRU 46.783808
MUR 53.221526
MVR 18.037925
MWK 2032.686411
MXN 21.718247
MYR 4.92911
MZN 74.929531
NAD 20.737801
NGN 1798.226279
NIO 43.141033
NOK 11.944706
NPR 164.01236
NZD 1.957077
OMR 0.450427
PAB 1.171506
PEN 4.131513
PGK 4.948413
PHP 66.326585
PKR 332.664687
PLN 4.257455
PYG 8780.244627
QAR 4.274785
RON 5.060089
RSD 117.120174
RUB 93.365816
RWF 1696.194288
SAR 4.395499
SBD 9.642189
SCR 17.272426
SDG 703.489128
SEK 11.157735
SGD 1.499264
SHP 0.92062
SLE 27.177033
SLL 24565.896027
SOS 669.937247
SRD 43.836005
STD 24247.811607
STN 24.511218
SVC 10.257
SYP 15231.864138
SZL 20.733078
THB 37.824714
TJS 10.930509
TMT 4.111987
TND 3.446781
TOP 2.820706
TRY 47.73078
TTD 7.960643
TWD 35.089538
TZS 3045.915955
UAH 48.670728
UGX 4170.895348
USD 1.171506
UYU 46.942886
UZS 14664.110781
VES 155.520411
VND 30795.967364
VUV 140.053656
WST 3.11401
XAF 655.699054
XAG 0.030383
XAU 0.000349
XCD 3.166054
XCG 2.112648
XDR 0.822792
XOF 655.699054
XPF 119.331742
YER 281.483577
ZAR 20.514185
ZMK 10544.963998
ZMW 26.990389
ZWL 377.224496
  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    73.08

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.6400

    14.94

    +4.28%

  • CMSC

    0.0200

    23.08

    +0.09%

  • SCS

    0.2300

    16.19

    +1.42%

  • RIO

    0.9600

    63.1

    +1.52%

  • CMSD

    -0.0107

    23.56

    -0.05%

  • VOD

    0.0300

    11.54

    +0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.9500

    70.28

    -1.35%

  • BCC

    3.5200

    84.26

    +4.18%

  • RELX

    -0.2100

    47.83

    -0.44%

  • GSK

    0.5100

    38.22

    +1.33%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.38

    -0.07%

  • AZN

    1.2700

    75.34

    +1.69%

  • BTI

    -0.4100

    57.92

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    24.5

    +0.61%

  • BP

    0.1200

    34.07

    +0.35%


DOGE Fails to Slash U.S. Spending




The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), launched with bold promises to revolutionize federal spending, has fallen dramatically short of its ambitious goals, raising questions about its effectiveness and impact on the U.S. budget. Tasked with streamlining government operations and slashing what its proponents called wasteful expenditure, DOGE was heralded as a transformative force. Yet, recent developments reveal a stark reality: the initiative has failed to deliver meaningful spending cuts, leaving its lofty objectives unfulfilled and critics pointing to mismanagement and inflated claims.

Initially, DOGE set out with a headline-grabbing target of reducing federal spending by $2 trillion, a figure that captured public attention and underscored the initiative’s audacious vision. This goal was later halved to $1 trillion, signaling early challenges in identifying viable cuts without disrupting essential services. More recently, reports indicate that the projected savings have dwindled to a fraction of the original promise, with estimates suggesting only $150 billion in reductions—a mere 7.5% of the initial target. Even this figure has faced scrutiny, with analysts arguing that the actual savings may be significantly lower due to questionable accounting methods and speculative projections.

One of the core issues plaguing DOGE has been its approach to identifying efficiencies. The initiative aimed to eliminate redundant contracts, streamline federal agencies, and reduce bureaucratic overhead. However, the execution has been chaotic, with cuts often appearing indiscriminate rather than strategic. For instance, reductions in consulting contracts, particularly in defense and IT services, were touted as major wins, yet many of these contracts supported critical government functions. The abrupt termination of such agreements has led to operational disruptions, forcing agencies to scramble for alternatives or reinstate services at additional cost.

Moreover, DOGE’s efforts have sparked unintended consequences across federal agencies. Staff reductions, intended to shrink the workforce, have instead triggered inefficiencies, with remaining employees struggling to handle increased workloads. This has been particularly evident in agencies responsible for public services, where understaffing has led to delays and diminished service quality. The ripple effects extend beyond government operations, impacting private-sector contractors who relied on federal partnerships. Layoffs in consulting firms and other industries tied to government contracts have further eroded confidence in DOGE’s strategy.

Critics argue that DOGE’s aggressive push for cuts overlooked the complexity of federal budgeting. Many targeted programs, such as grants for cultural institutions or international development, represent a tiny fraction of the budget but deliver outsized benefits in terms of public goodwill and long-term economic gains. Eliminating these programs has yielded negligible savings while generating significant backlash. Similarly, attempts to overhaul agencies like the Social Security Administration have raised alarms about potential disruptions to benefits, undermining public trust in the initiative’s priorities.

The leadership behind DOGE has also come under fire. High-profile figures driving the initiative were expected to bring private-sector ingenuity to government reform. Instead, their lack of experience in public administration has led to missteps, including overestimating the ease of implementing cuts and underestimating the resistance from entrenched bureaucratic systems. Public perception has soured as well, with polls indicating growing skepticism about DOGE’s ability to deliver on its promises without harming essential services.

Financially, the broader context paints a grim picture. While DOGE aimed to curb deficits, the federal debt continues to climb, projected to exceed $36 trillion in the coming years. Tax cuts passed concurrently with DOGE’s efforts are expected to add trillions more to the deficit, offsetting any savings the initiative might achieve. This contradiction has fueled accusations that DOGE was more about political optics than genuine fiscal responsibility.

Looking ahead, DOGE’s future remains uncertain. With its initial timeline nearing its end, pressure is mounting to demonstrate tangible results. Supporters argue that the initiative has at least sparked a conversation about government waste, laying the groundwork for future reforms. However, without a clear pivot to more targeted, evidence-based strategies, DOGE risks being remembered as a cautionary tale of overambition and underdelivery.

In the end, the Department of Government Efficiency has not lived up to its billing as a budget-cutting juggernaut. Its inability to achieve meaningful spending reductions, coupled with operational missteps and public skepticism, underscores the challenges of reforming a sprawling federal system. As the U.S. grapples with fiscal challenges, the DOGE experiment serves as a reminder that bold promises must be matched by careful execution.