Berliner Boersenzeitung - Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

EUR -
AED 4.331285
AFN 75.468553
ALL 95.455853
AMD 435.133136
ANG 2.110613
AOA 1082.496254
ARS 1649.279971
AUD 1.625795
AWG 2.125489
AZN 2.009303
BAM 1.960362
BBD 2.374715
BDT 144.673819
BGN 1.967008
BHD 0.445031
BIF 3508.088307
BMD 1.179189
BND 1.49518
BOB 8.147963
BRL 5.795828
BSD 1.179039
BTN 111.34021
BWP 15.830843
BYN 3.332255
BYR 23112.111202
BZD 2.371308
CAD 1.612011
CDF 2670.864298
CHF 0.916177
CLF 0.026704
CLP 1051.00014
CNY 8.019372
CNH 8.014083
COP 4422.526062
CRC 542.013173
CUC 1.179189
CUP 31.248518
CVE 110.903223
CZK 24.334582
DJF 209.565995
DKK 7.476537
DOP 69.985351
DZD 155.960046
EGP 62.195977
ERN 17.68784
ETB 185.491052
FJD 2.574218
FKP 0.865474
GBP 0.864889
GEL 3.154379
GGP 0.865474
GHS 13.313508
GIP 0.865474
GMD 86.674958
GNF 10353.282886
GTQ 9.002953
GYD 246.714182
HKD 9.235117
HNL 31.390478
HRK 7.538916
HTG 154.379289
HUF 353.981307
IDR 20491.303919
ILS 3.421187
IMP 0.865474
INR 111.345548
IQD 1544.738045
IRR 1546506.829043
ISK 143.873347
JEP 0.865474
JMD 185.842514
JOD 0.836092
JPY 184.734208
KES 152.328133
KGS 103.085327
KHR 4728.549695
KMF 492.90156
KPW 1061.251335
KRW 1723.880942
KWD 0.36279
KYD 0.982687
KZT 544.929701
LAK 25889.102525
LBP 105596.406437
LKR 379.599647
LRD 216.385693
LSL 19.327363
LTL 3.48184
LVL 0.71328
LYD 7.458419
MAD 10.754655
MDL 20.163928
MGA 4911.324039
MKD 61.616155
MMK 2476.100645
MNT 4223.124889
MOP 9.507427
MRU 47.102764
MUR 55.210091
MVR 18.163925
MWK 2054.148249
MXN 20.255648
MYR 4.623647
MZN 75.362436
NAD 19.327358
NGN 1609.593864
NIO 43.293982
NOK 10.859513
NPR 178.160636
NZD 1.976185
OMR 0.453919
PAB 1.179144
PEN 4.04993
PGK 5.129916
PHP 71.358689
PKR 328.581553
PLN 4.239717
PYG 7202.120307
QAR 4.29269
RON 5.21945
RSD 117.297547
RUB 87.543025
RWF 1722.206041
SAR 4.459737
SBD 9.456429
SCR 16.459646
SDG 708.107537
SEK 10.86706
SGD 1.494391
SHP 0.880384
SLE 29.067455
SLL 24727.006491
SOS 673.91103
SRD 44.100547
STD 24406.83871
STN 24.939855
SVC 10.317092
SYP 130.375396
SZL 19.303765
THB 37.973479
TJS 11.001504
TMT 4.127163
TND 3.379601
TOP 2.839205
TRY 53.475102
TTD 7.990886
TWD 36.927538
TZS 3063.998569
UAH 51.791223
UGX 4417.888438
USD 1.179189
UYU 47.025255
UZS 14309.46312
VES 588.693738
VND 31022.113342
VUV 139.685143
WST 3.192143
XAF 657.487181
XAG 0.014668
XAU 0.00025
XCD 3.186819
XCG 2.124956
XDR 0.82014
XOF 657.402298
XPF 119.331742
YER 281.384102
ZAR 19.315951
ZMK 10614.123377
ZMW 22.449247
ZWL 379.698489
  • VOD

    0.5100

    16.2

    +3.15%

  • RELX

    0.0759

    33.58

    +0.23%

  • GSK

    -0.0900

    50.41

    -0.18%

  • CMSC

    0.1400

    23.11

    +0.61%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4100

    16.37

    -2.5%

  • NGG

    0.9800

    86.89

    +1.13%

  • RBGPF

    0.7000

    63.61

    +1.1%

  • BTI

    0.2000

    58.28

    +0.34%

  • AZN

    0.3300

    182.85

    +0.18%

  • RIO

    2.2700

    105.38

    +2.15%

  • BCC

    -2.0900

    70.67

    -2.96%

  • CMSD

    0.1140

    23.534

    +0.48%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    13.15

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.4300

    24.14

    -1.78%

  • BP

    -0.4700

    43.34

    -1.08%

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules / Photo: Giuseppe CACACE - AFP/File

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.

Text size:

The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.

Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.

Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.

US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .

However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.

The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.

Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.

- 'Smoke and mirrors' -

Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.

Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."

He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.

Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".

Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.

Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.

Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".

AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.

- Vagueness -

Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.

This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.

At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.

It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.

The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.

"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.

The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.

These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.

On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.

They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.

(O.Joost--BBZ)