Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 4.269234
AFN 80.747171
ALL 98.080176
AMD 449.296326
ANG 2.080199
AOA 1065.844912
ARS 1464.514001
AUD 1.783092
AWG 2.092172
AZN 1.976412
BAM 1.958399
BBD 2.361879
BDT 142.148666
BGN 1.9563
BHD 0.438229
BIF 3485.896645
BMD 1.162318
BND 1.498876
BOB 8.084661
BRL 6.462739
BSD 1.169953
BTN 100.37322
BWP 15.73188
BYN 3.828782
BYR 22781.426517
BZD 2.349665
CAD 1.595124
CDF 3354.448871
CHF 0.931601
CLF 0.029289
CLP 1123.950026
CNY 8.337294
CNH 8.347545
COP 4690.532995
CRC 590.083185
CUC 1.162318
CUP 30.801419
CVE 110.410592
CZK 24.644603
DJF 208.336513
DKK 7.462673
DOP 70.583682
DZD 151.264224
EGP 57.403733
ERN 17.434765
ETB 162.537928
FJD 2.621494
FKP 0.867753
GBP 0.86792
GEL 3.150033
GGP 0.867753
GHS 12.167044
GIP 0.867753
GMD 83.100848
GNF 10149.470827
GTQ 8.978917
GYD 244.672635
HKD 9.124043
HNL 30.60462
HRK 7.53426
HTG 153.609913
HUF 400.103455
IDR 18935.782243
ILS 3.906521
IMP 0.867753
INR 99.878537
IQD 1532.63418
IRR 48962.631722
ISK 142.406944
JEP 0.867753
JMD 186.968152
JOD 0.824097
JPY 172.989483
KES 150.155716
KGS 101.640729
KHR 4688.101253
KMF 493.549108
KPW 1046.145791
KRW 1612.855142
KWD 0.355448
KYD 0.974994
KZT 615.316676
LAK 25221.475057
LBP 104127.086711
LKR 352.237505
LRD 234.571333
LSL 20.822637
LTL 3.432022
LVL 0.703075
LYD 6.340415
MAD 10.546807
MDL 19.772243
MGA 5186.884262
MKD 61.641283
MMK 2439.803528
MNT 4168.892865
MOP 9.459856
MRU 46.492853
MUR 53.059611
MVR 17.899787
MWK 2028.692571
MXN 21.86076
MYR 4.935175
MZN 74.341802
NAD 20.822637
NGN 1777.602145
NIO 43.057147
NOK 11.945638
NPR 160.597152
NZD 1.956715
OMR 0.446908
PAB 1.169943
PEN 4.171737
PGK 4.839423
PHP 66.306151
PKR 332.965026
PLN 4.258093
PYG 9059.023537
QAR 4.265124
RON 5.076074
RSD 117.126521
RUB 90.95098
RWF 1690.543764
SAR 4.35936
SBD 9.669971
SCR 17.063617
SDG 697.977271
SEK 11.313256
SGD 1.493386
SHP 0.913399
SLE 26.093788
SLL 24373.225166
SOS 668.587379
SRD 43.545647
STD 24057.629254
SVC 10.236586
SYP 15112.316557
SZL 20.815627
THB 37.783482
TJS 11.184548
TMT 4.079735
TND 3.373622
TOP 2.722268
TRY 46.774456
TTD 7.942542
TWD 34.18179
TZS 3039.460814
UAH 48.924435
UGX 4193.529759
USD 1.162318
UYU 47.682877
UZS 14857.719823
VES 135.787803
VND 30403.3247
VUV 138.807864
WST 3.20021
XAF 656.828772
XAG 0.030561
XAU 0.000348
XCD 3.141221
XDR 0.816884
XOF 656.828772
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.526058
ZAR 20.828854
ZMK 10462.253387
ZMW 26.699417
ZWL 374.265819
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.