Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 4.263418
AFN 80.102537
ALL 97.805681
AMD 445.92619
ANG 2.077667
AOA 1064.548062
ARS 1462.724764
AUD 1.78108
AWG 2.089625
AZN 1.970327
BAM 1.944607
BBD 2.345598
BDT 141.147534
BGN 1.956957
BHD 0.437671
BIF 3296.963587
BMD 1.160903
BND 1.488333
BOB 8.027791
BRL 6.449741
BSD 1.161713
BTN 99.666306
BWP 15.621083
BYN 3.801816
BYR 22753.692361
BZD 2.333468
CAD 1.592468
CDF 3350.365078
CHF 0.930493
CLF 0.029264
CLP 1122.987363
CNY 8.327139
CNH 8.339333
COP 4684.822731
CRC 585.927315
CUC 1.160903
CUP 30.763921
CVE 110.924556
CZK 24.670688
DJF 206.315482
DKK 7.464557
DOP 69.985049
DZD 151.058119
EGP 57.359856
ERN 17.41354
ETB 158.521228
FJD 2.646274
FKP 0.864129
GBP 0.866857
GEL 3.145847
GGP 0.864129
GHS 12.072602
GIP 0.864129
GMD 83.004803
GNF 10048.773236
GTQ 8.91568
GYD 242.949454
HKD 9.112744
HNL 30.589896
HRK 7.535649
HTG 152.532003
HUF 400.499527
IDR 18889.743909
ILS 3.905579
IMP 0.864129
INR 99.830142
IQD 1520.7825
IRR 48903.025148
ISK 142.419701
JEP 0.864129
JMD 185.651363
JOD 0.823043
JPY 172.712714
KES 150.339252
KGS 101.516991
KHR 4666.828971
KMF 492.948309
KPW 1044.839818
KRW 1610.334071
KWD 0.355118
KYD 0.968127
KZT 610.98309
LAK 25034.866299
LBP 103958.834524
LKR 349.756748
LRD 233.341266
LSL 20.814798
LTL 3.427844
LVL 0.702218
LYD 6.280324
MAD 10.519518
MDL 19.63299
MGA 5142.798473
MKD 61.604186
MMK 2437.527181
MNT 4161.658823
MOP 9.393231
MRU 46.110683
MUR 52.751702
MVR 17.871696
MWK 2015.92058
MXN 21.834054
MYR 4.939678
MZN 74.250898
NAD 20.815169
NGN 1775.66964
NIO 42.663115
NOK 11.895108
NPR 159.466089
NZD 1.948951
OMR 0.446358
PAB 1.161713
PEN 4.134022
PGK 4.798301
PHP 65.979972
PKR 330.451204
PLN 4.264226
PYG 8995.222163
QAR 4.226384
RON 5.07837
RSD 117.150452
RUB 90.639837
RWF 1667.636688
SAR 4.354117
SBD 9.658199
SCR 16.891204
SDG 697.121269
SEK 11.283068
SGD 1.491731
SHP 0.912287
SLE 26.062511
SLL 24343.553151
SOS 663.454797
SRD 43.492635
STD 24028.341446
SVC 10.164492
SYP 15093.882638
SZL 20.814972
THB 37.822193
TJS 11.105873
TMT 4.074768
TND 3.367202
TOP 2.718952
TRY 46.735626
TTD 7.886604
TWD 34.134141
TZS 3032.862341
UAH 48.579867
UGX 4164.031217
USD 1.160903
UYU 47.347461
UZS 14853.749195
VES 134.316236
VND 30343.093576
VUV 138.731534
WST 3.18577
XAF 652.202823
XAG 0.030725
XAU 0.000349
XCD 3.137398
XDR 0.811419
XOF 652.427167
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.183787
ZAR 20.804902
ZMK 10449.515398
ZMW 26.515374
ZWL 373.810187
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.